Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TPM on Dennis Kucinich crazy talk

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 01:12 PM
Original message
TPM on Dennis Kucinich crazy talk
Rep. Kucinich (D-OH) says President Obama should be impeached over the Libya campaign.

A short while ago a couple of our reporters were asking questions on the history of the War Powers Act and the necessity for a declaration of war for the president to go to war.

I explained that the current constitutional rule is that a president doesn't have to do anything to send the military into battle. Except in cases where the ruling party believes an Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) sets the party up well for the next election campaign.

So in general, it's ideal to have a congressional vote except if you don't have time or don't want to.

http://editors.talkingpointsmemo.com/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. OK, riddle me this.
Is our president essentially a dictator with imperial unilateral power to
take this country into war at will or whim?

Or are we a country with a constitution and a balance of powers responsible
to the public?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. give me a break.....
Clinton conducted no fly zones and nobody bitched about congressional approval....this has everything to do with hatred for Obama and not the constitution....this is quite obvious....anyway, a president never needs approval before starting military actions....this is a "FOX News" made up type outrage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Clinton was accused of waging the dog so people would quit...
talking about that woman... Monica.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. right....
but it was not coming from dems....he conducted no fly zones and not a peep from dems or liberals....THIS IS ALL ABOUT HATRED FOR OBAMA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vicar In A Tutu Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Is it a race thing?
Edited on Mon Mar-21-11 03:35 PM by Vicar In A Tutu
I'm wracking my brain, but somehow that seems to be the only really logical reason for this folly. If not, where was he when Clinton did his thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. What did Kucinich say in 1998?
Edited on Mon Mar-21-11 03:47 PM by Drunken Irishman
Wasn't he in Congress then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. actually Kucinich was part of a suit against Bill Clinton, there was
one other Dem. - Marcey Kaptur, but all the other plaintiffs were conservative republicans. Bob Barr, Mark Sanford, Tom Tancredo, Bob Schaffer, Phil Crane, Dan Burton, and others.

They brought this suit 2 days after Pres. Clinton announced intervention with NATO forces in Kosovo.

The suit was dismissed for "lack of standing" and an appeals court agreed. So, as far as I can see, this is just posturing- or attention seeking.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 05:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
19. that is baldly false
both then and now liberals opposed that mission, wrongly in my opinion but they did oppose it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runework Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
20. yeah?
I had major problems with Clinton's action-

no congressional approval

siding exclusively against the serbs when EVERYONE was committing war crimes, including the croats

yes, the croats who enthusiastically ran concentration camps and to this day arent shy about unfurling their swastikas.


but no, problems with this Libyan action...all boil down to irrational hatred...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. this happened to Pres. Clinton -
DK and several other Congressmen, all but DK and one other were Republicans- Bob Barr, Tancredo, Marc Sanford, and Ron Paul among them.

The case was dismissed, and dismissed again on appeal.

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine1967 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Simple answers: No and Yes.
No riddle at all.

The War Powers Resolution of 1973 (50 U.S.C. 1541–1548) was a United States Congress joint resolution providing that the President can send U.S. armed forces into action abroad only by authorization of Congress or if the United States is already under attack or serious threat. The War Powers Resolution requires the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action and forbids armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days, with a further 30 day withdrawal period, without an authorization of the use of military force or a declaration of war. The resolution was passed by two-thirds of Congress, overriding a presidential veto.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Powers_Resolution


As of today, SCOTUS has not ruled the War Powers Resolution of 1973 unconstitutional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. All Presidents should seek Congressional approval for military actions IMO
I don't want a President that goes off to war on his own without Congressional approval. Something like that shouldn't happen in a Democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I agree. Unfortunately the tradition since WWII is to ignore that.
Obama isn't doing anything that any of the previous president's didn't do. It doesn't mean it is right or that they all couldn't have been impeached for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yup. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MedicalAdmin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. What makes you think you live in a democracy?
Voting machines with proprietary software and no paper trail?

Unilateral executive powers?

The patriot act?

Collusion between business leaders and government flunkies?

Lack of oversite or regulation?

Union busting?




What makes you think the the USA is a functioning democratic republic? It's an empire where the rich and connected do whaterver the fuck they want and the rest of us just hope we don't get crushed today... and maybe tomorrow if we are lucky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Agree 100%
We are not a functioning Democratic Republic and the fact that a President can go to war without congressional approval is just one of many examples of why our democracy is broken.

Our government is sold to the highest bidder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MedicalAdmin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. If I may provide a small refinement of our post...
"our government WAS and IS sold to the highest bidder."

Past tense. AND present tense. It's an ongoing decades old project.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. There's a whole boatload of things that *shouldn't* happen in our government that do
With someone like Obama at the helm, an AUMF is not high on my list to be concerned about, next to right wing fundamentalist nutjobs running amok with legislation and some of it getting through.

I think he did ok on Libya, and if he'd try'd to get AUMF Benghazi would have been overrun before it happened. It wasn't like Congress didn't know what was coming. It's not like he declared war in the middle of the night on a country that was basically stable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. The Senate passed a resolution on March 1st in reference to
endorsing the UN to established a no-fly-zone.....

so Congress not only knew, but they were clamoring for it.
Then when it happened, some of them changed their minds, I guess. :shrug:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=433x635010
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReggieVeggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
17. So this article is bunk
Since Kucinich NEVER said Obama should be impeached. FAIL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC