Kurt_and_Hunter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 07:09 PM
Original message |
Tweety: "If reconciliation was used the Republicans would ensure that no more bills would ever pass" |
|
Edited on Wed Dec-16-09 07:11 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
How would they do that?
By not voting for any of our bills?
Bills where not a single Republican votes with us?
OMG... what a terrifying prospect. That would be awful!
|
polichick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 07:11 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Apparently only Republicans are allowed to use reconciliation. nt |
RUMMYisFROSTED
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 07:11 PM
Response to Original message |
librechik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 07:12 PM
Response to Original message |
3. So why didn't that happen the 23 times the Pukkkes used it during the Bush eon? |
|
Tweety is a miserable squawking putz with a brain the size of a parakeet's.
|
grantcart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 07:14 PM
Response to Original message |
4. He seemed to be worked up and believing his own blather |
|
I hope he has a good health care plan, that level of self absorbed panic could cause a spring to blow.
HA!
|
asdjrocky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 07:14 PM
Response to Original message |
|
And I was surprised that no one said, "As opposed to all the bills they let pass now?"
I remembered today why I stopped watching Tweety.
If this is our media, we are double screwed.
|
villager
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 07:18 PM
Response to Original message |
6. then let them *fucking do it*. It is, at last, time to call this bluff... |
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 09:07 PM
Response to Original message |
7. In the future sweety pop...... |
|
.... after the 2010 elections when the Dem majority wont be as large and we'll actually NEED Republican votes.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:10 AM
Response to Original message |