question everything
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 08:27 PM
Original message |
If and when a health care reform bill passes, let's strip Lieberman from |
|
any committee chairmanship. Why help the guy promote himself to his constituents in 2012?
What has he done to help Democrats since we took the White House?
To paraphrase Dear Abby: are we better off without him or with him?
|
Bluzmann57
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 08:29 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Hell I say let's strip him now |
|
As you so astutely asked, what has he done to help Democrats? Answer, nothing.
|
Parker CA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. Let's only strip his chairmanship though, not him. |
Bluzmann57
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Stripping him! Now I'm going to have nightmares. :evilgrin:
|
Parker CA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 08:29 PM
Response to Original message |
2. That would be great to see, but it will never happen. The "poor Joe" and "evil Dean" memes today |
|
have pretty much solidified which side the leadership feels is important to defend.
|
AndrewP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. Yep. They are in bed with Joe baby. |
movonne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 08:30 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Because Obama and the DLC want him... |
question everything
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Why? So we can say that we have 60 votes in a Democratic caucus? |
|
Except, is he part of the caucus? Bernie Sanders is, and he gets crap all over him.
I thought that "reading the amendment" was a filibuster act. At least, this is what they used to do in the 60s to prevent the passage of the Civil Rights law. Why were there not enough votes to stop it?
|
rhett o rick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. Why? Because they are corporatists and really dont want reform. They are glad Liarman takes the heat |
RoccoR5955
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 08:37 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Strip him down, then tar and feather the bass turd! |
rhett o rick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 08:48 PM
Response to Original message |
8. You say that as if you are naive enough to think that "we" have that power. I think kink rahm likes |
|
Edited on Wed Dec-16-09 08:49 PM by rhett o rick
the bastard.
|
Nictuku
(907 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 08:59 PM
Response to Original message |
10. It will have to wait until next Congress session |
|
You can't change the rules in the middle of the game, and so even if Harry Reid wanted to strip him of his chairmanship, it can't be done until the next congressional session.
Same thing with changing the filibuster rules. That can't be done in the middle of the game either.
These are the Senate Rules that currently govern the Senate. Yes, those rules can be changed, but only at certain times.
|
quakerboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
How were the Repubs planning to exercise the "nuclear option" a few years back?
I understand that as things sit we cannot strip him out. By the time we can, hopefully he will be former senator Lieberman. But why can we not change senate rules, and then do it?
|
mcablue
(625 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 09:02 PM
Response to Original message |
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 09:22 PM
Response to Original message |
12. AFTER ENDA Is passed.... |
|
.... since he's the Senate author of the bill.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:26 PM
Response to Original message |