Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What the hell is wrong with Dick Durbin?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 01:55 PM
Original message
What the hell is wrong with Dick Durbin?
ABC: Sen. Dick Durbin: Social Security Cuts Should Not Be Ruled Out

<...>

"We're very, very close," Durbin said. "And there's a sense of urgency. Our relevance is going to be hooked to our timeliness. If we wait too long, we may not be players. And a lot of people are counting on us to be players."

Durbin criticized a resolution put forward by Sen. Bernie Sanders, a liberal independent from Vermont, that says Social Security should not be cut under a deficit reduction plan. Durbin said he would not vote for such a resolution.

"I think Bernie is going too far with his language," Durbin said.

"In 2037, as we know it, Social Security falls off a cliff," he said. "There's a 22 percent reduction rate in payments, which is really not something we can tolerate. If we deal with it today, it's an easier solution than waiting. I think we ought to deal with it. Many of my colleagues disagree, put it off to another day. But from my point of view, leaving it out makes it easier politically, including it, I think, meets an obligation, which we have to senior citizens."

<...>


Watch the interview at the link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. ".... and, frankly, they own this place"
"... and me as well..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. fixing it is fine so long as they do so by raising the cap on income taxed
hell, if they raised it enough, they could even lower the rate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. He is weak
He apologizes whenever someone criticizes him and cries on the floor of the US Senate.

What a pathetic "leader".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. He had tears in his eyes just once - and that was a cruel devastating
RW attack that only a few Democrats have experienced. (Other than the Clintons and the Obamas, who had/have the Presidency as a platform to respond from, the others I have seen are Kerry and Reid.)

It was mean spirited and they knew it was a distortion and a lie. They took comments where he spoke of the horror that American troops had committed abusive actions at Abu Ghraib. He said that those actions were things he never expected from Americans, but rather Nazis, etc They said that he was calling the US military Nazis - rather than saying the actions were. He apologized after the Republicans had a show and dance of three Republicans giving emotion speeches that were said terrible things about Durbin. Outside the Senate, the same distortion rattled through their echo chamber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. That's fine, but somebody with that little spine should not be in a leadership position
As I have said since 2004, if you cannot handle dealing with the MSM and the GOP's bullshit then you do not belong in any leadership position in the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. My point is that Durbin is no weaker than most
He actually is one of the stronger Democrats. Harry Reid looked every bit as bad as Durbin did when the RW took his stuff and did the same thing. John Kerry did a great job calling out the RW and the media one of the times that they were going after Reid, which helped, but there really is an unequal playing field. Between Fox News and most AM talk radio, they have an incredible echo chamber.

I really don't know who exactly you would want in the Democratic leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ex-fellow Senator voices compromise.
I'm comforted knowing that you assured us it would never happen. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. 2037 is 26 years away - a quarter of a century
The idea that any major changes should be made now because there is a problem 26 years out is pathetic. Forecasting - even a budget - is not precise enough even for 5 years, much less 26!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I recall that Durbin was blindsighted by the financial meltdown
he did not see it coming even a day or week ahead of time. So when he starts in on what he 'knows' about 27 years in the future, I have to laugh. He was in the Senate, blindsided by the finacial realities. As were the rest of these gangsters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Actually, he wasn't
Durban tried at least twice to append an amendment on predatory lending in 2005 and 2006 that would have banned many of the type of loans that got into trouble.

As for the derivatives and credit swaps that greatly magnified the problem, I think many of the people who created them did not understand the problem. 60 Minutes had a show where top bank people admitted they did not understand them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. This should be emphasized repeatedly
Forget five years; forecasters can't even agree on next year. Imagine the number of variables looking out over a quarter century that could change everything. Relative competitiveness, political change (yes, dear Senators, it is possible)demographics in a country as dynamic as ours, new technologies, etc. If there's one thing a Senator can't admit, it's the ignorance that all humans suffer from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. The morning the crash happened a US Senate peer of Dick's
declared 'the fundamentals of the economy are sound' and not one Senator had said otherwise. Not one. Surely not Dick Durbin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. I completely agree with you
I used 5 because it is not unusual to do 5 year plans. However, every year - or maybe more frequently - you redo them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Oh, I wasn't being critical
You made an essential point. Just reinforcing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. I knew your point was supportive, but it really did make me realize that things are so volatile that
Edited on Tue Apr-19-11 04:12 PM by karynnj
year out is not that reliable.

I am confused at the different takes on the 2037 number between Durbin, who seems to take it as an urgent matter - and Kerry in the following letter to the editor written a week or so ago, using an earlier estimate that Medicare was good until 2029. Note that he also speaks of things already in the health care bill that could lead to lower costs.


YOUR APRIL 6 editorial “Ryan’s Medicare plan is unfair — but at least he has one’’ ignored the fact that the Senate already walked the walk, casting tough votes to extend the life of Medicare. The Affordable Care Act strengthened Medicare by extending the solvency of the trust fund from 2017 to 2029, the largest extension in history. It produced more than $500 billion in savings over the next decade, reduced drug costs for seniors, and provided free preventive services to reduce costly care later.

We saved Medicare billions by eliminating wasteful overpayments while reducing beneficiary premiums. We did it without cutting a single benefit and by strengthening access to primary care.

We’re testing the most promising models of payment reform that reward the quality of care delivered instead of the quantity of tests ordered and services performed.

More difficult decisions remain to tackle deficits and revive Clinton-era balanced budgets. But that too will require both political parties putting the next generation ahead of the next election.

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/letters/articles/2011/04/07/senate_has_walked_the_walk_on_medicare_reform/

Here is another article which I think is about a future MA test of payment reform.


http://articles.boston.com/2011-02-17/news/29339756_1_unnecessary-tests-and-procedures-health-care-state-subsidized-health-insurance

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. It's bizarre. Daily Kos is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. I like Durbin...But this is bullshit
Simply raise the cap on income subject to Social Security a bit, and much of that gap could be eliminated. And it is not an exorbitant sacrifice for very high income people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Playing politics?
I like and trust Durbin. Look at the group he's working with - he's the only leftie there. If it were me, I don't think I would say I am working with a bunch of morons who have presented the craziest budget ever offered by any party in the history of this country. He has to appear in the middle but I think at the end of the day he will do what he can for the liberal side of things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. He does not have to be 'in the middle' what tripe.
He is speaking his mind, or what passes for his mind. He is not to be trusted at all. If the Republicans are on the right, why the fuck should he be 'in the middle'? Why? To what end? To keep the discussion rightward, that is why. Durbin can go straight to hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. What a wonderful discussion.
You are brilliant. Hard to argue with such a studied, well documented opinion. Obviously, must change my own. Even though this man has been my senator for 15+ years, it's obvious to me now that I know nothing about him. Well, thanks for the insight!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Look, the idea that there always has to be right wing rhetoric
called 'the middle' which is not really what they mean, but they 'have to say it' is tripe. Horrible way for people to be, in any occupation. It is called being a double dealer.
He is endorsing cuts to Social Security. That is obvious to everyone here. Sorry if your don't like it, but I don't like right wing rhetoric out of alleged Democrats such as Dickie.
I spoke about your opinion, you got personal and rude. I said nothing about you, I addressed your opinion. I did not ask you to change your mind. I did not snark at your intellectual abilities. I am not the subject of this thread, Dickie is, and his rhetoric about cutting Social Security. Trash my opinion if you wish, but getting personal is really not acceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. I think calling my opinion tripe was rude.
And the response was merited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. Durbin does not operate in a vaccum
Edited on Tue Apr-19-11 02:09 PM by Cali_Democrat
Clearly discussions take place all the time between Democrats in Congress and the Obama Administration.

Durbin is a high level Senator with a lot of influence.

This is definitely something we should be paying attention to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Obama said today he's for increasing the taxable limit in SS deductions.
Durbin needs to get with the program!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. I would expect Senator Durbin agrees with the president on lifting the cap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessionalLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
19. "An obligation you have to senior citizens..."
....to NOT pay back their money that was stolen from SS and to cut their benefits instead?

Bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liskddksil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
22. Take Action Now!
IL residents should call Durbin's office and tell him hands off Social Security other than raising the cap.

202-224-2152

Others should call the DSCC and say no more contributions if Durbin and other Dems goes through with this.

202-224-2447
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-11 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #22
36. +1000000 Thank you for the phone numbers! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrossChris Donating Member (641 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
24. Sounds like typical Third Way rhetoric. Will any of us be surprised when other Dems follow suit?
I think we've all seen this show before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
26. he's signaling that there will be cuts
duh. (sorry, but it's pretty obivous).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
29. His bosses pulling his strings....his mouth opens
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hulka38 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
30. Democratic leaders have been grooming us for months now.
Something major is about to happen. The possibilities as I see it are:

1. A complete cave in with major cuts to medicare, medicaid and SS. <---completely unacceptable to the base and too politically damaging.
2. Major cuts to medicare and medicaid with no cuts to SS. This will allow the Democrats to act triumphant in the wake of caving on the other two.

I think the second is most likely knowing the current make up of Democratic Party leadership. Dampen expectations to the point that anything they agree to is a victory when they pull SS out of the fire. There has to be something to pull out of that fire. Sanders knows this which is why he's trying to take it out of the equation before the kabuki begins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
31. We are actually screwn. Durbin is sadly one of our better people and a leader.
Our shit is in a general state of disarray, at best. You cannot seek the "center" of batshit crazy and get even passable results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vroomvroom Donating Member (496 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
33. Democrats == Republicans (We've Always Known this but chose not to believe)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
34. There are no..
Edited on Tue Apr-19-11 10:46 PM by butterfly77
Democrats/Progressives in the gang of six and that is why we had problems with what a lot of us wanted in the healthcare bill..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
35. Give me a fucking break.
This was a surprise to nobody, least of all this administration.

This is one more step in the slide, folks. They are coming for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC