Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Birthers Should Object To

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Bad Thoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 06:37 AM
Original message
What Birthers Should Object To
I've been looking for stories about HOW the White House obtained a copy of Hawaii's records of President Obama's birth. It is not the document that the state releases when pressed with such requests. Even Terrence Lakin received the same "certificate of live birth" that Obama produced in 2008 when he tried to get a birth certificate for his Hawaii-born daughter. There is no special box to check when getting the so-called "long-form", no special fee to pay. Access to the state's original records is simply highly restricted. What the White House showed us is not something that the average person could get: a photograph or scan of the actual archival record.

So how did they get it? Did the President call in some favors? Maybe U Hawaii is now the contender for a Presidential library? Will there be some special fund raising activities to help Pacific Island Dems?

Birthers could raise a whole slew of question that would insinuate that corruption allowed for the release. However, they would have had to admit that citizens are not privy to this information, and that Candidate and President Obama could never normally get copies of this record. They could insinuate that Obama misused the presidency.

Indeed, they would have to admit that THERE IS NO LONG-FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE that the State of Hawaii offers. The document doesn't exist. Full records of births are something that the state keeps for itself and does not certify publicly.

Actually, Birthers could get craftier and claim that what the White House showed is not a birth certificate at all. And it's not. It's not the document that the state releases to certify births. It's a copy of their archival records. The document released in 2008 is the only certification that Hawaii offers. Calling this new document a long-form birth certificate perpetuates a lie and gives legitimacy to the argument that Obama could have produced it at any time.

Of course, if Birthers make this argument, they'd have to admit they were full of crap all along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC