garybeck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 11:29 AM
Original message |
Poll question: Would you support a Democratic challenger in the 2012 presidential primaries? |
|
If you vote for choice 1, please reply with suggestions.
|
Tom Rinaldo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 11:30 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Unlikely but increasingly becoming less unlikely. n/t |
garybeck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. If the war goes bad, all bets are off. Look at what happened to LBJ. |
garybeck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 11:31 AM
Response to Original message |
calico1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 11:32 AM
Response to Original message |
suzie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
36. Because the regular base of the Democratic Party that doesn't spend their time |
|
on DU being shrill doesn't want to see 30 years of the same kind of administration we had under Bush? Or worse, the kind we might get under Palin?
Why are there so many here who want to turn everything over to Republicans permanently?
|
Garam_Masala
(711 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #36 |
|
Edited on Thu Dec-17-09 05:29 PM by Garam_Masala
No one wants to turn it over to republicans, Palin especially.
But watching the performance of the president so far, I am willing to keep an open mind. Open mind simply means I have NOT decided, one way or the other. May be some other candidate will appeal to us more and push strongly single payer.
|
calico1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #36 |
58. No......what I mean is nobody is going to challenge Obama |
|
for the Democratic nomination. It just isn't realistic to think that can happen.
So all this speculation about who should challenge Obama in 2012 is just wishful thinking. Barring Obama doing something truly unspeakable, resigning or God forbid dying in office he will run again in 2012 and no one will challenge him for the nomination.
|
suzie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-18-09 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #58 |
61. I wasn't disagreeing with you, just should have used a sarcasm icon. |
closeupready
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 11:33 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Dean, Kucinich, Feingold. |
harun
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
30. Yah, you can trust those three, not many others. |
Renew Deal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 11:33 AM
Response to Original message |
6. I would support banning people that start these polls |
garybeck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. geesh, I thought there was free speech. It's not like I'm telling people to leave the party.... |
opihimoimoi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. Its a tad Divisive....free speech vs substance |
Papagoose
(361 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
14. Well that's mighty Democratic of you. |
Sebastian Doyle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
Because they would vote for a DEMOCRAT?
I'm sure we have some people here who voted for Ted Kennedy in the 1980 primary. You want to ban them too?
|
WheelWalker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message |
9. That's yelling "FIRE" in a crowded theater! |
Kurt_and_Hunter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message |
10. Only if he/she could win the nomination. A symbolic challenge would weaken the party to no purpose. |
Tom Rinaldo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 11:44 AM
Response to Original message |
11. I think any primary challange to Obama would face odds far worse... |
|
than Ted Kennedy's challange to Carter did. And that led to Reagan's election. McCarthy couldn't defeat LBJ, if LBJ didn't decide to step aside he would have been renominated. Nixon won the following election.
|
salguine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 12:06 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Jesus Christ, yes. The way things are going now, by next year we'll be |
|
levying fines against homeless people for not buying houses.
|
ima_sinnic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
41. lol! and for not upgrading to the latest model car & going w/out life insurance |
|
yes, I will be first in line to vote for someone against the one-party system of corporate bloodsuckers and vampires.
|
Garam_Masala
(711 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
43. I just fell of the chair laughing n/t |
impik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-18-09 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
66. Obama would win 2012 in a landslide, and you all |
|
just stay as bitter as you always been.
|
BlueIdaho
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 12:08 PM
Response to Original message |
13. I say Obama won't run for a second term. |
Papagoose
(361 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
I can't really even explain why, but I get that feeling.
|
BlueIdaho
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
He is the dog that caught the car - now he just doesn't know what to do with it. But its not his fault - exactly. The party seeing a real opportunity to land someone in the WH took the pulse of the country and realized it was time to try the "fresh face" strategy again. So they found a handsome young man with a telegenic family. Much to their surprise, it turned out he could make a pretty good speech too. Just like boxing promoters, they needed him ready for a big payday fight so they put him up against some real canvas backs so they could build up a terrific record fast. They got him to the senate without much fuss where they showcased him in some very public committee hearings followed by TV testimonials from virtually every democratic senator with some name recognition - "He's Amazing..." "Wise Beyond his years..." "A three dimensional chess master" they all said - and the legend was born.
Just one problem. The President waltzed into the WH without ever facing a fierce opponent. Much to his surprise, the republican party knows how to fight close and fight dirty. Its early rounds yet but he's been knocked on his ass at least three times and now he's cut over his right eye. I think he suddenly realizes just how long four years can be and just how unequipped he is for the fight of his life. The problem, you see, is that unlike the last WH occupant, this one has a sense of self and a curious mind. He knows he needs a knock-out to win and he just isn't a big puncher.
He'll announce he's not running after we lose seats in 2010.
|
garybeck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
25. Look at history. LBJ. If the war goes bad, and Dems are protesting, he's toast. |
closeupready
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
31. Nobody elected to the most powerful office in the world gives it up. |
|
He will run for a second term.
|
brentspeak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
quantass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
32. Obama will become MORE progressive nearing Primaries ONLY to re-establish Liberal "Hope" n/t |
|
Edited on Thu Dec-17-09 02:14 PM by quantass
|
ima_sinnic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
46. sorry, once burned, twice shy--ain't buying the next time around |
|
I've learned it's all fluff without any substance and just a way to get into my wallet.
|
bigwillq
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 12:24 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Depending on who the challengers are. Dean, Kucinich I would vote for again. I did in 2004 and 2008.
|
David Zephyr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 12:35 PM
Response to Original message |
17. I support democracy. I support the primary process. |
slackmaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 12:45 PM
Response to Original message |
18. One man comes to mind... |
Writer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 12:47 PM
Response to Original message |
19. I can't believe that it hasn't even been a year, and some people are actually considering this! n/t |
Arkana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 12:50 PM
Response to Original message |
21. Unless Obama's caught in some sort of dead girl/live boy scenario, no. |
tranche
(913 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 12:55 PM
Response to Original message |
|
If you think it's Obama and not the need of the party to secure campaign financing by showering favors on corporate interests, then you're more a part of the problem then you believe Obama may be. What Kuch (or any other liberal fantasm) would need to do to win the nomination (of 1 of 2 major US parties mind you) would be to morph into the type of deal maker you'd end up hating as well. Work on campaign finance reform instead of rearranging deck chairs. Pathetic.
|
TexasProgresive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 12:59 PM
Response to Original message |
24. Oh! and when did that ever work? |
|
I was trying to think of a time when running against a sitting president for the nomination ever resulted in a White House win for the contender. Maybe it's happened but I don't think this would do anything but guarantee another puke in the White House. Stupid is as stupid does.
|
uponit7771
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 01:10 PM
Response to Original message |
26. You're fuckin kiddin right?! |
CBR
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 01:13 PM
Response to Original message |
27. if you stuck by Clinton in 1996 and don't stick by Obama in 2012... |
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
ima_sinnic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #37 |
45. please expand on this |
|
I'm curious what relevance that has to ANY of this and how you can explain it without being simply a racist.
|
ima_sinnic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
44. what the hell does that mean? everything's exactly the same as in 96? |
|
funny, I forgot that Bill Clinton was at the head of an effort to force me to buy worthless, overpriced health insurance. He also forced me to hand over money to banks and wall st. fatcats to prop up a corrupt, unregulated system--silly me!
sorry, Obama lost me back when he gave Baucus the task of "shaping" health care "reform" without giving him any basic conditions or features that the reform should have, and without ensuring that everybody would "have a seat at the table" as he LIED they would. He treated the idea of single-payer like a joke, the same way he treats legalization of marijuana.
Obama treats progressives like scum, something that might get his hands dirty. Not again for that one from me, I'm finished being his unwitting tool to my own demise.
|
CBR
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #44 |
55. It means what you assume it means nt |
LooseWilly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-18-09 04:42 AM
Response to Reply #27 |
65. I voted for Cthulu in '96... |
Jennicut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 01:36 PM
Response to Original message |
28. Nah, not into giving the Rethugs a win for the WH. |
|
It always happens that way. No matter what, a Rethug is always worse. Please remember 2000. It was a third party but same concept.
|
Blue_In_AK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 02:01 PM
Response to Original message |
29. President Obama was not one of my top choices in 2008 |
|
so, yes, I would be interested in a primary challenger, depending on who it is.
|
phleshdef
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 02:14 PM
Response to Original message |
33. Yea, lets have Carter/Reagan all over again. Fucking foolishness. |
Arkana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
35. But...but it strengthened the party for 1980! Look at the landslide election Carter won! |
Vidar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 02:30 PM
Response to Original message |
34. Dean, Kucinich or Feingold. |
|
Edited on Thu Dec-17-09 02:30 PM by Vidar
|
alcibiades_mystery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 05:17 PM
Response to Original message |
38. I won't support a challenger in the primary or the general |
Odin2005
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 05:22 PM
Response to Original message |
La Lioness Priyanka
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 05:24 PM
Response to Original message |
40. no because whether or not I consider obama a sell out, i am confident |
|
that america will only vote for a republican or a sell out dem
|
Divine Discontent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 05:54 PM
Response to Original message |
47. 100% likely if the opportunity arises, since I'm a Dem, but if no challenger, I will either vote 3rd |
|
or not at all, or as my friend said, "well if there's really no one else with a chance, and it's Mittens vs Obama, I'll probably vote Obama - just depends on how bad the weather is that day..."
says it all.
|
Metric System
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 06:01 PM
Response to Original message |
48. Ugh, some of you are determined to have a Rethug President in 2012. |
brentspeak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #48 |
50. It appears Obama is the one who's determined to see the White House go back to the GOP |
ima_sinnic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #48 |
54. well, others are determined to have a repthuglican democrat--what's the diff? |
|
you haven't noticed we're in a one-party system now?
|
Phx_Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 06:04 PM
Response to Original message |
51. Progressive = Republican President |
|
Edited on Thu Dec-17-09 06:05 PM by Phx_Dem
|
IndianaGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 06:07 PM
Response to Original message |
52. If the captain of the ship doesn't change course, he will have a mutiny on his hands. |
|
Too early to tell, but at this rate we are going to have our hands full saving those worthy of reelection in 2010.
|
depakid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 06:12 PM
Response to Original message |
53. Democracy like nature abhors a vacuum |
|
Attempt to create (or create the perception of) a center right coalition- and progressive elements of the former base will seek another candidate (or party) that they believe more accurately reflects and earnestly responds to their attitudes, beliefs and values.
|
Avalux
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 06:14 PM
Response to Original message |
56. HOLY SHIT. A year into his term, and a majority have thrown Obama under the bus. |
|
I'm completely disgusted. What the hell has happened to DU?
|
IndianaGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #56 |
59. How could we have thrown Obama under the bus when he is the one that threw us there? |
|
The Lieberman/Obama Health Racketeering bill was the last straw for many people still hoping for Obama to do good.
|
jefferson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-18-09 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #56 |
69. Trolls, cynics, and haters aplenty. |
Blasphemer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 06:16 PM
Response to Original message |
57. Possibly.. depending on what the person's platform was. |
|
However, I would hold no illusions about their chances of winning. They would not. Still, I think primary challenges and additional national parties are key to reclaiming true democracy regardless of the initial outcomes.
|
old mark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 06:46 PM
Response to Original message |
60. A viable LEFT Democrat...what I thought I was getting this time... |
|
Yes, I certainly look forward to it.
mark
|
winyanstaz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-18-09 03:16 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Fri Dec-18-09 03:18 AM by winyanstaz
are my favorites. We did not leave Obama, he deserted us.
|
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-18-09 03:49 AM
Response to Original message |
63. We'll see who steps into the fray. Were a challenger to emerge she or he |
|
would have to have a pile of cash and a rationale of candidacy plus critical mass and momentum, plus significant electoral appeal in Iowa and New Hampshire.
Not least, she or he would have to be instantly acceptable to county chairfolk coast to coast who are promoting Democratic candidates up and down the ballot. Said chairfolk are most certainly not going to get behind a Kucinich or a Dean candidacy.
|
vaberella
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-18-09 04:24 AM
Response to Original message |
64. The man has barely completed 11 months and yet....people want him out. |
|
I mean for us to have this discussion when there are so many other things going on politically says to me that people just want President Obama out of office, now and would give a rats ass about 2012.
|
argonaut
(246 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-18-09 07:36 AM
Response to Original message |
67. A majority are 'open to the idea'? |
|
Well, that's it. We're doomed in 2012.
|
goldcanyonaz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-18-09 07:51 AM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:13 AM
Response to Original message |