Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Steve Benen: Welcome to the Grand Bargain

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 07:35 AM
Original message
Steve Benen: Welcome to the Grand Bargain
Posted with permission.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal/2011_07/welcome_to_the_grand_bargain030715.php

Welcome to the Grand Bargain

By Steve Benen


In just three hours, the White House will host the latest, and arguably the most important, round of debt-reduction talks, and the pre-meeting positioning has already raised enough eyebrows to make the entire political world appear to be in a perpetual state of surprise.

The so-called Gang of 10 — Obama, Biden, Boehner, Reid, McConnell, Pelosi, Cantor, Durbin, Kyl, and Hoyer — will meet with just 26 days before a rather-inflexible deadline, at which point the United States government will exhaust its ability to pay its debts. But before the leaders sit down at the table, the trial balloons are already flying pretty high.

Up until now, the projected goal has been a deal that would reduce the debt by (roughly) $2.4 trillion over (roughly) 10 years. But President Obama, who spoke Tuesday about “a unique opportunity to do something big,” apparently intends to go even further, eyeing a $4 trillion deal.

And on how on earth could policymakers reach such an agreement? By Republicans taking revenue seriously.

The president’s renewed efforts follow what knowledgeable officials said was an overture from Mr. Boehner, who met secretly with Mr. Obama last weekend, to consider as much as $1 trillion in unspecified new revenues as part of an overhaul of tax laws….


And on how on earth could the White House get Republicans to consider $1 trillion in new revenues? By putting Medicare and Social Security on the table.

President Obama is pressing congressional leaders to consider a far-reaching debt-reduction plan that would force Democrats to accept major changes to Social Security and Medicare in exchange for Republican support for fresh tax revenue. <…>

As part of his pitch, Obama is proposing significant reductions in Medicare spending and for the first time is offering to tackle the rising cost of Social Security, according to people in both parties with knowledge of the proposal.


This, in effect, is the Grand Bargain. In fact, it’s been the blueprint for the Grand Bargain (and the Gang of Six talks) since late last year: entitlements for revenue.

To state what’s painfully obvious, the details mean everything. We don’t know what kind of revenue, if any, Republicans would agree to, and we don’t know what kind of entitlement cuts the president is prepared to accept. There’s apparently some talk about means testing Medicare, but it’s hard to say whether that’s just scuttlebutt.

To be sure, if this is the deal that’s taking shape, it would serve as a stunning development, but at this point, I’d recommend caution and patience. Indeed, if I were a betting man, I’d say the most likely scenario is that these leaks are coming from the White House with the intention of making Republicans look even worse if the talks break down. “Democrats offered the GOP everything,” the argument will go, “and Republicans still said no.”

That said, if this is more than just posturing, and the basis for a $4 trillion deal really is coming together, it would be the sort of agreement that would “shake Washington to its foundation, raise howls from advocacy groups across the political spectrum, and, of course, mean real, difficult changes to peoples’ lives.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. "difficult changes" to poor and working peoples' lives-- the rich and war-mongering, not so much
Edited on Thu Jul-07-11 07:38 AM by villager
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. It would also pretty much doom the President's re-election prospects
Once the deal went down, the republicans would immediately start to paint him as the man who destroyed Medicare and Social Security.

And they'd keep doing so, with the assistance of their buds in the liberal media, until even Newt Effing Gingrich would lead him in the polls.

Regardless of how important beltway pundits think this debt limit crap is, most Americans don't give a shit about it. What they care about is their own financial situation. The President has been snookered into committing political suicide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. remove the income cap on SS nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. A simple, practical fix.
Let's do that. So-called problem solved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. But is it within the "art of what is possible" because the Republicans *will* say no? nt
Edited on Thu Jul-07-11 08:07 AM by Pholus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC