Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Using Clawbacks to Punish Bank Executives

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:11 AM
Original message
Using Clawbacks to Punish Bank Executives

Using Clawbacks to Punish Bank Executives

By PETER J. HENNING

A common complaint has been the absence of prosecution of financial executives for their role in the economic crisis in 2008, but what is equally striking is the large compensation those executives received while their companies pursued increasingly risky policies that led to the crisis.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has taken small steps to address this issue. It is pursuing claims for damages against former top executives at Washington Mutual, which became the largest bank failure in history. The F.D.I.C. has also adopted a new clawback rule for failed banks that would allow it to try to reclaim two years worth of executive compensation.

The F.D.I.C. is pursuing its case against Kerry K. Killinger, Washington Mutual’s onetime chief executive, and two other executives at the bank for risky lending practices that led to its shutdown in September 2008. The complaint alleges they were grossly negligent and breached their fiduciary duty for undertaking a so-called “higher-risk lending strategy” that increased the bank’s exposure to subprime mortgages concentrated in California and Florida, undermining its capital base when the housing market collapsed.

The defendants have assailed the F.D.I.C. claims as a public relations move, asking for dismissal of the lawsuit because they exercised reasonable business judgment in shifting the bank into subprime loans. A brief filed by Stephen J. Rotella, Washington Mutual’s former chief operating officer, contends that the case “amounts to a pure public relations stunt designed to deflect criticism away from the F.D.I.C., which has been — and continues to be — under fire for its regulatory failures with respect to WaMu and refuses to take any responsibility for its central role in the financial crisis.”

more



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. No comment? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HappyCynic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. K & R
Here's a K&R because this deserves more attention than it's getting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC