Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Right-Wing Media Downplay Default Risks By Accusing Obama Of "Threatening" Social Security Benefits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 01:27 AM
Original message
Right-Wing Media Downplay Default Risks By Accusing Obama Of "Threatening" Social Security Benefits
Media conservatives are accusing the Obama administration of "threatening" Social Security benefits after the president observed in an interview that he could not guarantee that benefits could be paid if the debt limit were not increased. Economic experts agree that failure to increase the debt limit would force the federal government to prioritize its legal obligations and strain its ability to pay Social Security benefits.

(...)

Fox Nation: "Obama Threatens To Withhold Social Security Checks From Seniors And Vets."

Drudge: "Obama Threatens To Hold Up Social Security Checks."

Breitbart TV: "Obama To Hold Senior And Vets Benefits Hostage For Tax Increases."

(all referring to Obama's CBS Evening News interview)

(...)

But Economic Experts Agree That Social Security Benefits Are At Risk

Harvard Economist Frankel: Choosing Not To Pay Certain Bills "Would Mean Failing To Honor Legal Obligations" Including Social Security. Jeffrey Frankel, a Harvard economist who serves on the National Bureau of Economic Research, criticized claims that "come August 3, the federal government could retain its top credit rating if it continued to service its debt by ceasing payment on its other bills." According to Frankel:

But this would mean failing to honor legal obligations that have already been incurred (paying suppliers for paper clips that have already been bought, paying soldiers their wages for last month's service, sending social security recipients their checks, etc.). This is like observing that the cliff is not a 90 degree drop-off, but only 110 degrees. It doesn't matter: the car would still go crashing into the ocean far below. The government's credit would still be downgraded and global investors would still demand higher interest rates to hold US treasuries, probably on a long-term basis.

full: http://mediamatters.org/research/201107130001
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
David Gill Donating Member (183 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Uh-oh, the President might lose the support of FOX News viewers!
The obvious counter to this is that it's the Republicans that are threatening Social Security benefits by failing to take the debt ceiling seriously, and tying Obama's hands in terms of what he can do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Unfortunately, a lot on the left are carrying water for them. As usual.
Look around DU and you'll find all the people insisting that Obama is threatening to starve the elderly just because he feels like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 05:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. My oh my, the screw does turn. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. We wouldn't be at this point if the REPUBS hadn't drug us here
by refusing to do something they had absolutely no problem doing 7-8 times during the past 10 years. Obama was trying to make sure people understand the consequences of refusing to raise the debt ceiling and there are a lot of teabaggers whom receive SS. There is a difference between (rightly) warning about a potential consequence of something and holding something hostage but of course why would they waste time worrying about their inaction/obstruction when they can just simply blame Obama for more villainy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. I thought Eric Cantor was threatening Social Security benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC