Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WSJ backs McConnell plan (and a ‘bipartisan’ deal)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 11:54 AM
Original message
WSJ backs McConnell plan (and a ‘bipartisan’ deal)

WSJ backs McConnell plan (and a ‘bipartisan’ deal)

By Steve Benen

While the right doesn’t seem at all pleased with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell’s (R-Ky.) proposed solution to the debt-ceiling crisis, opposition among conservative Republicans is far from unanimous.

The Wall Street Journal’s editorial page, one of the more influential pieces of Republican media real estate, got on board with the McConnell plan this morning. After several hundred words about how much the editorial page doesn’t like President Obama, the WSJ argued:

The hotter precincts of the blogosphere were calling this a sellout yesterday, though they might want to think before they shout. The debt ceiling is going to be increased one way or another, and the only question has been what if anything Republicans could get in return. If Mr. Obama insists on a tax increase, and Republicans won’t vote for one, then what’s the alternative to Mr. McConnell’s maneuver? <…>

Even if Mr. Obama gets his debt-limit increase without any spending cuts, he will pay a price for the privilege (under McConnell’s proposal).

For Republicans looking for an excuse to back the McConnell plan and get out of this mess, perhaps the editorial will offers some cover.

But what I found especially interesting about the WSJ piece came in the last paragraph of the editorial. (thanks to D.D. for the tip)

We’d far prefer a bipartisan deal to cut spending and reform entitlements without a tax increase.

Yes, according to the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal, a “bipartisan deal” on debt reduction would include the spending cuts Republicans want, entitlement cuts Republicans want, and the existing tax rates Republicans want. Democrats, in this “bipartisan deal,” would get nothing.

more


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Pubbies like to pretend...
They have nothing, so they are making things up. They look sillier day by day.

There is no silk purse coming from the sow's ear, no matter how they try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. What a shock, A Murdoch owned paper supports a GOP trap for Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. WSJ makes a really great fish wrapper. I like to cut up my watermelon on this rag.
Makes for easy clean up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I like to wet mine and use it to wipe my you know what.
:shrug: Just sayin'


}(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Of course they do
1. Business gets to breath a sigh of relief.
2. The GOP gets to keep trotting out this scam issue again closer to the election.
3. Taxes remain in their favor indefinitely.

Win win win for the WSJ's constituency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC