|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Dulcinea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 06:55 AM Original message |
Bill Would Ban Discrimination Against Jobless in Hiring |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 06:58 AM Response to Original message |
1. Good first step. Can we combat ageism as well? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Loge23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 07:11 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Good point! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tallahasseedem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 03:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 07:11 AM Response to Original message |
3. Yes. I can see the House of Boehner/Cantor/Ryan pass this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud Liberal Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
4. The idea of companies refusing to hire people whom are UNEMPLOYED simply is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jimmyflint (239 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 03:37 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. + 1 I don't get it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Igel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 07:25 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. I can think of some reasons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jimmyflint (239 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 08:53 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Thanks, it never even crossed my mind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dulcinea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 07:17 AM Response to Reply #10 |
18. The jobless shouldn't be counted out just because they're unemployed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dulcinea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
5. kick for the jobless. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
8. Good move! K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
9. May it pass with flying colors! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
11. Now this is something worth while and the correct thing to do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
12. It's disgusting that we even need a bill like that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cereal Kyller (400 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 05:22 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. Yes, and stupid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
21st Century FDR (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 09:03 PM Response to Original message |
14. Can't wait to hear the teabaggers excuse for voting this down. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ck4829 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 01:02 AM Response to Original message |
15. Time to put a pair of scissors to the vicious circle. K&R. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saras (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 02:49 AM Response to Original message |
16. So what? Now they'll require current experience in their field. Unemployed? No current experience. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
19. Good. It makes no sense anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 17th 2024, 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC