Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lindsey Graham let the cat out of the bag

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 08:45 AM
Original message
Lindsey Graham let the cat out of the bag
Basically admitted that the whole debt limit crisis was manufactured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lazarus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. link?
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Graham: GOP has no one 'to blame but ourselves'/ here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine1967 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh -- is there a link to that?
that is delicious.

If so, it further confirms my belief that the GOP has LOST the Debt limit debate. When you run out of bullets, you throw the gun. :)

Now I just hope that we can save the nation -- this is a really bad crisis that the GOP created. Manufactured as it is -- they made it a serious situation. It's bad, and the GOP did this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Graham: GOP has no one 'to blame but ourselves
“Our problem is we made a big deal about this for three months. How many Republicans have been on TV saying, ‘I’m not going to raise the debt limit.’ You know, Mitch says, ‘I’m not going to raise the debt limit unless we talk about Medicare.’ And I’ve said I’m not going to raise the debt limit until we do something about spending and entitlements.’ So we’ve got nobody to blame but ourselves,” Graham told reporters after a GOP caucus lunch.

“We shouldn’t have said that if we didn’t mean it.” /snip

http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/0711/Graham_GOP_has_no_one_to_blame_but_ourselves_.html

Not really "admitting it was manufactured" but an interesting statement nonetheless.

And...

The South Carolina Republican said he hopes House Republicans can pass legislation that raises the debt limit while also structurally changing the way the government spends money. One proposal calls for deep spending cuts, statutory spending caps, and a constitutional amendment to balance the budget.

“If they can’t, then Mitch’s idea makes sense,” Graham said. “But if they can pass something out of the House that raises the debt limit that changes the reason we got in debt, that would be a fundamental new direction for the country, I think we should support that.” / snip

(same link)

Not sure if the OP was referring to something else, but this is just what I found on a quick look-see.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine1967 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Thank you!
much appreciate it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why did the WH play along?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bornskeptic Donating Member (951 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Are you suggesting what the teabaggers claim, that failure to raise the debt limit
would not be catastrophic? Lindsey Graham isn't that stupid. Ordinarily raising the debt ceiling is a routine, noncontroversial matter. It only became a crisis this time because the Republicans made it a crisis, but they had the power to do so, and President Obama had no choice but to try to protect the nation from them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I am suggesting that the WH knew it was a manufactured crisis
and played along with the drama. No one seriously believed they would let it go to default. Neither side would let that happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I admire your "stick-to-itive-ness"
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bornskeptic Donating Member (951 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. You're giving House Republicans way too much credit.
There are about 60 of them who won't vote for a debt ceiling increase under any circumstances, and many more who won't vote for a debt ceiling increase without spending cuts of the same size. Boehner wants to raise the debt ceiling, but he would need to getabout 25 halfway sane Republican members to vote along with the Democrats to do so. He can't get them. That's the whole point of McConnell's proposal-to make some of the idiots think that Obama would actually be raising the debt ceiling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. I highly doubt that Boehner can't get 25 Republicans to vote for it
If he can't, then he might as well step down as Speaker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. Don't you think Cantor has been trying to keep his caucus from voting with Boehner?
It would make Cantor Speaker if Boehner falls.

Wheels, within wheels...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. No, I think Cantor and Boehner are playing good cop bad cop
And fortunately the President is calling them out on the bullshit games. You don't get to be Speaker if you can't deliver 1/10th of your caucus on a vote. There is no rift between Boehner and Cantor and Boehner is fully capable of delivering the votes for a compromise without any prospect of a Cantor mutiny. Boehner is trying to make it look like Cantor is tying his hands and fortunately the President isn't falling for that crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Yeah, the President has nothing better to do than
whip up some drama with the Republicans in cahoots.

Again minimizing the nefarious intent of R's and dragging President Obama down to equivalent status with them.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. For a political victory
If the WH is really good, in every sense of the word, they will get something tangible out of this manufactured crisis besides political points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. You do remember they were going to let UI benefits run out last year right?!!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Only because the Dems failed to act when they had the power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
9. They are on the ropes and looking for a graceful way out. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
12. That's why it's amazing Obama is even trying to play ball with these folks
It was nothing but manufactured bullshit. Obama should have told them to fuck off all along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Which is why you're not president. There's a reason he's made gains with Indies,
and kept his Democratic base, and it's not from telling other elected officials to "fuck off". I'm glad my president has some class. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. There's a reason why the Dems got blasted in the 2010 elections
Obama and the Dems didn't listen to their base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Well, if the "true progressives" are correct, it was moderate & conservative Dems
who stayed home. Apparently, "progressives" showed up in the same numbers as in 2008. Which is it? There's a thread in this very forum that makes this claim. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Well then that thread is wrong
Edited on Thu Jul-14-11 05:51 PM by Cali_Democrat
Most Dems were disheartened by Obama's conservative policies. This caused enthusiasm to dry up. It wasn't nearly where it was in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Are you sure? It was one of your BFF's who made the claim.
I would look it up, but I no longer have search priveleges, but it is in this very forum. He/she was scolding someone who made the exact same claim that you're making now. Who to believe? Since I have very little in common with either of you, as you both are clearly ABO, I'm not sure whose word to take. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. My BFF? LOL!
Edited on Thu Jul-14-11 09:17 PM by Cali_Democrat
I'm sorry, but I have no idea who or what the hell you're talking about.

This might be one of the strangest replies I've ever seen. Trying to respond to me using another poster's words, a post I have never read, and claiming that they are my BFF so I should agree with them. And because I don't agree, there is some kind of inconsistency. Good lord! :spray: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Say hi to t..........
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. LOL
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. It never IS the same in a non-prez election

The lazy blue dogs stayed home...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #21
33. Such a thread is wrong. Why bother 'going there'?
I was watching polls in 2008 and 2010. I've posted about my observations -confirmed by stats- several times.

In 2010 the youth vote, Latinos and blacks simply did not show up to vote as they did in 2008. This was noticed and recorded all over the country. Midterms are traditionally ignored by 'occasional' voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. "Midterms are traditionally ignored by 'occasional' voters."
Thank You. I've been amazed that the more progressive than thou DU'ers attached so much more significance to the losses in the 2010 midterms as if they really meant more than any previous midterm.

Until the Clinton years (Hunting of the President), I never voted in a midterm election, because I didn't see them as important, a trait I inherited from my father. Now I know better. Midterms are dominated by older, more religious, predominantly Anglo constituencies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
14. I don't know how much worse it can get for repubs. Make this viral. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. K n R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
23. I predict that Lindsey is about to be Tea bagged, big time!!!
And then, come election time, the far right will also be running a primary opponent against him!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
25. Shock Doctrine applied to America's poor and elderly.
Sicko.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
32. I kind of respect Lindsey Graham
Most of the time hate what he says or does, but respect him. He is the real deal, in the sense that he actually means what he says (usually, or often, he is a politician after all), is not stupid or ignorant, and has guts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 05:29 AM
Response to Original message
36. Damn I thought you were going to say he admitted he was gay
My whole day is ruined now. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC