Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Obama really raising the Medicare age to 67?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 07:16 PM
Original message
Is Obama really raising the Medicare age to 67?
and not out of necessity?

really?

is he really going to do this?

i don't know if this makes 2012 easier for him, but it makes it harder for me. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Time for old folks to eat their peas."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. There you go again, sounding exactly like Fauz News' Monica Crowley's fearmongering bullshit.
The similarities are striking: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=433x712015

All fearmongering rhetoric, no facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You're cute.
Very amusing.

Keep fighting the good fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. And right.
Edited on Fri Jul-15-11 07:25 PM by ClarkUSA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. If I see her, I will
Edited on Fri Jul-15-11 07:28 PM by MannyGoldstein
I promise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
30. Do you have to tell someone HI? I have to tell
some Lady Rothssomething hi too. I hope I get messenger pay if I ever encounter her.:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissDeeds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
40. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. ...
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
39. He apparently endorsed means testing but stopped short of endorsing raising age from 65 to 67
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. Only 5% of Medicare recipients pay higher Medicare premiums now.
Specifically, individual seniors with income of $85,000 or couples making over $170,000 pay somewhat higher Medicare premiums. This is about five percent of current Medicare recipients.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2011/07/president-obama-publicly-supports-means-testing-medicare.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Only if you pass one of the death panels.
Then you don't even live that long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. No.
He can't. Congress has to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Only in the increasingly unlikely event that the Republicans
agree to a bigger plan than the McDonnell one -- and even then, it will all depend on the whole package.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. No.
He is willing to compromise on a number of things. There is NO agreement, and its extremely foolish to think there is.

As Lawrence just said, 'The politics of campaigning is very different from the politics of governing.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. No, but President Obama is targeting Big Pharm for cuts, much to their horror.
Edited on Fri Jul-15-11 07:23 PM by ClarkUSA
Drugmakers led by Pfizer Inc. (PFE) and Merck & Co. were targeted for Medicare cuts by President Barack Obama as lawmakers push to agree on a deficit plan. The industry predicted “startling” job losses would result.

Pharmaceutical companies “are still doing very well through the Medicare program,” Obama said today at a news conference. “Although we have made drugs more available at a cheaper price to seniors who are in Medicare through the Affordable Care Act, there’s more work to potentially be done.”

The drug industry contributed $80 billion toward the cost of last year’s health-care law, helping Democrats make up for new spending in the bill. With cuts to Medicaid and Medicare on the table as part of deficit talks, the industry may have to give up more as an Aug. 2 deadline looms.

“It’s extremely unfortunate that President Obama continues to push for a policy that could destabilize the successful Medicare Part D program and have a devastating effect on American jobs,” said Karl Uhlendorf, vice president of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, the drug industry’s Washington lobbying group. “Startling potential job losses could result from policy proposals that would undermine the business foundations of biopharmaceutical companies.”

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=433&topic_id=711891&mesg_id=711891


I recommend you don't believe a thing unless you hear it from President Obama himself. There are agents of disinformation paid for by the Koch Brothers whose only interest is sowing disharmony amongst Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. there won't be disharmony from me on this issue if he doesn't do it
but we're hearing from that he is willing to offer this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. In this political form of poker he's playing with Republicans, you'll "hear" alot of things.
Edited on Fri Jul-15-11 07:33 PM by ClarkUSA
Doesn't mean it's true and it sure as heck doesn't mean it'll happen. I have yet to hear one quote from President Obama where he says that. Like I said, there are plenty of fearmongering shit-stirrers being paid by the Koch Brothers who are being deployed to sow anger and discontent on progressive websites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. if it doesn't happen i'm okay with it
Hmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. FYI: Obama's $2T plan does not include cutting SS benefits. It does include tax increases.
Edited on Fri Jul-15-11 07:46 PM by ClarkUSA
"In Obama's $2 trillion plan, tax increases would come from a 35% limit on itemized deductions and the elimination of special-interest tax breaks for oil and gas companies, corporate jet owners and producers of ethanol. If tax rates on upper-income people returned to 36% and 39.6% in 2013, as Obama wants, the limit on deductions would save about $120 billion.

Obama also is seeking to extend a payroll tax cut enacted last December for another year and possibly extend it to small businesses. For that reason, Republicans could claim that the package is revenue-neutral rather than representing a tax increase — but at the meeting, Republicans still refused to go along.

The remainder of the package would be spending cuts and savings on interest, but not the major reductions in Medicare or Social Security that Obama had been (supposedly) willing to accept as part of a $4 trillion deal."


Read more here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=439&topic_id=1499062&mesg_id=1499799



Note that President Obama mentioned a means test. That would technically "cut" spending on SS, but not slash/cut benefits for those in need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. I thought we were doing quite well.
Anyway, thanks for the civil discourse up to now. I rather like my sig. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #27
33. What photo?
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #33
51. lol
Edited on Sat Jul-16-11 07:35 PM by ClarkUSA
:fistbump:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. I like your signature photo :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Aww... I got something just for you.
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. Agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vattel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #18
43. Did his 4T plan include raising Medicare eligibility age to 67?
I think it did, but I could be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #16
56. This "political form of poker"
is demoralizing the Democratic electorate just like extending the tax cuts did in 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. He said he would consider looking at it in the "out years," not for current beneficiaries.
Kicking the can down the road.

Lawrence O'Donnell has been talking about the politics of it, if you get MSNBC. I won't pretend that I understand all the political implications.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. and Lawrence said few do understand!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. messing with the Medicare age is more important to me than any political advantages
it should be to you as well.

yes, i like O'Donnell and he is to the left of most people --still not good enough to justify postponing eligibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
19. I bet not.
IMHO, he's attempting to educate the public about choices in a way that directly effects everyone. When when we protect tax breaks for the most wealthy at a cost to the arbitrary "welfare queen" it doesn't strike the same chord. How much will teabaggers appreciate government and entitlement programs, if they're suddenly forced to think the direct impact on THEM?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
20. You never loved him. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. that's the funny thing --because i *did*...or i wouldn't have been in Reno back in 2008
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. My post was a joke. I should have used the sarcasm smiley.
I know that you are a long-time supporter of Barack Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. you know, i think what i was enamored of was what i *thought* he was going to be
what he has turned out to be, while in some respects good, seems different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Safetykitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
25. Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
29. O'Donnell said they already did that in either Reagan's term
or Clinton's term. If you can find his show online, take a listen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. What? Medicare's age wasn't raised during Clinton or Reagan
and don't tell me to go find a video online to prove a claim that's untrue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. That's confusing Social Security and Medicare.
It's already 67 for getting full Social Security benefits.

http://www.ssa.gov/pressoffice/IncRetAge.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. i think they're trying to trick me
in order to defend Obama's idea.

instead of defending the idea itself, they lied about it.

let the people judge that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. Saddam/Osama....
Medicare/Social Security...

Common mental error to confuse similarly grouped things, especially when they're spoken about in conjunction with great frequency.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #35
49. Question re: SS age
Say if somebody's 'full benefits' won't be paid unless they start taking them at age 66, by taking SS at an earlier age, like 62, do they then lock themselves into permanent lower monthly checks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #29
52. My bad..it was Social Security, not medicare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thelordofhell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
38. No
Next stupid question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
42. Do you have a link to quote from Obama where he says that is his plan?
Lots of grasping of pearls, gnashing of teeth, rending of garments, and trips to the fainting couch here on DU ... and yet Obama has proposed doing no such thing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. Here's one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. I've seen that .... not one quote from Obama in it.
When you have an actual quote, from Obama, get back to me.

Until then, all the nee-jerking around here is getting kind of old.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. ignorance is bliss
let me know when you're ready for us to break it to you, we'll get the couch situated for fainting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. You'll have to remove the stack of folks who've been laying on it for the
last 6 months or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #42
46. And notice that Obama has become a monarch again!
Read the OP and you see he can do things single handedly!

We need a new monarch! Queen Elizabeth Warren!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
great white snark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
50. I heard he's lowering the minimum wage.
And he eats puppies.

Evil man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
53. Easier for him? Seniors will skin him alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
watercolors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
54. There are many of us who have worked well past 65,
I see no reason why it can't be raised. I retired at 75, I enjoyed my work and saw no need to retire that early. Our life span has increased and most of us are physically and mentally fit to continue if the need be! I'm now 79 and still could go back to what I loved doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
55. Obama is to the right of center on this issue.
Most Americans want to preserve the New Deal. This is the "center" position. Obama's position is clearly to the right of the American people. I believe the motive for this position is to depress voter turn out in 2012. Above all else TPTB want a legislature favorable to the wishes of the multinational corporations. If that means Obama loses in 2012, big deal, it will still be "mission accomplished".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC