Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Elizabeth Warren: "the President never wavered in his support"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 10:19 AM
Original message
Elizabeth Warren: "the President never wavered in his support"

Enemies Await Consumer Financial Protection

by Elizabeth Warren

This is a big week for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). Today, the President will announce his intent to nominate Richard Cordray to serve as the first Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. On Thursday, the CFPB makes its transition from a start-up to a real, live agency with the authority to write rules and to supervise the activities of America's largest banks.

Rich will be a strong leader for this agency. He has a proven track record of fighting for families during his time as head of the CFPB enforcement division, as Attorney General of Ohio, and throughout his career. He was one of the first senior executives I recruited for the agency, and his hard work and deep commitment make it clear he can make many important contributions in leading it. Rich is smart, he is tough, and he will make a stellar Director. I am very pleased for him and very pleased for the CFPB.

<...>

There's lots of good news, but make no mistake: this agency still has enemies in Washington, D.C. And they have a plan.

In May, forty-four Republican Senators wrote a letter saying that they will block anyone from serving as CFPB Director. Many of them don't like the agency or the ideas that led to its creation. They lost that fight last summer in a straight-up vote, but they say they will use a filibuster over a Director nomination to undercut the agency. Without a Director, however, the agency's authority over payday lenders, debt collectors and other non-bank financial companies can be challenged. The Republicans say that they will permit a Director only if the agency is amended to make it less independent and less likely to act.

<...>

This week is the culmination of two years of hard battles. The President put the consumer agency in his first outline of financial regulatory reform, and he never wavered in his support for it. The agency was declared dead several times, and weak versions and lousy bargains were offered again and again, but he stood fast. When he signed Dodd-Frank into law, creating the new agency, he offered me the chance to stand it up -- something for which I will always be grateful. The fights continued, and again, the President never wavered in his support. In fact, just last week he issued a veto threat if the Republicans try to move the agency's funding to the political process, and I know that in the future he won't allow opponents of reform to succeed in weakening the CFPB.

more



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. FUCK FACTS!!!! /sarcasm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. LOL!
Love it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
PragmaticLiberal Donating Member (169 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well, its obvious that Mrs. Warren is a "sell out".
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Palmer Eldritch Donating Member (369 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. oh, dammit! I wanted to be pissed about this. Why so rational, Elizabeth??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wha?
But he's the best friend the banks ever had!

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boxman15 Donating Member (389 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. Warren is
a spineless, corporatist, Wall Street-loving, neocon, sell-out, stealth Republican, of course. Anybody who's been paying attention realizes this. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
great white snark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R. And a big FU for anyone who throws this good woman under the bus.
Thanks ProSense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Just heard her on MSNBC now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. Why isn't Warren thrown under the bus? Obama's a "capitulator"/"caver-in-chief"
Warren's proven those idiots wrong. But that won't stop them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Not only that -
but he refused to appoint her to a post she didn't want......How DARE he???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tallahasseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. OH NOEZ!
You know those posts are coming...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. She is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tallahasseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. You mean Obama didn't MAKE her take the position?
Waiting for the "This is all Obama's fault she didn't want the position" threads...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. He didn't use the bully pulpit on her enough.
Maybe he needed to hit her with the podium.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. LOL!!!
Yes!

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
16. Kick
:kick: :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
17. More from KOS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. I do hope she seriously considers challenging Scott Brown.
She mentioned on TV she just wanted to go home and good lord I don't blame her. With or without her at the helm, the GOP will continue doing everything they can think of to tank the CFPB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. She'd be amazing in the Senate.
I agree. I hope she runs! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. I would LOVE to return Teddy's seat back to blue.
I can't think of a better candidate to do just that.

Cheers. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Absolutely
agree. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC