bigdarryl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 09:25 AM
Original message |
ASS HOLE Tea Partier Joe Walsh sued for $100,000 in child support |
|
This is what happens when stupid Americans don't vet people running for office JESUS!!! you can't make this shit up http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/28/joe-walsh-sued-for-100000_n_911800.html?ir=Politics
|
bigdarryl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 09:31 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Why the fuck isn't he arrested owing that much in child support |
|
there are guys who are locked up owing no where near that kind of money
|
Armstead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Well in his defense....(which I hate to do) it is possible this is just.... |
|
of of those claims or misunderstandings or hardball tactics that often come up in divorce cases.
I'm not defending the cheese-ball. But I do think we shouldn't rush to judgement without knowing all the facts.
|
bigdarryl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. OH PLEASE!!! if this was one of our own the media would be crucifying him |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-28-11 09:49 AM by bigdarryl
I don't give a fuck if he only owes $3.00 the POINT is he's always giving face time on every network talking about the Government is to big and needs to live in there means and needs to be responsible well he's not responsible in his own household and not taking care of his children.Also he works for the Government his child support should have automatically been garnished from his pay every two weeks.I retired from the State Of New Jersey as a Correction Officer and I knew a lot of guys who had child support taken out of there paychecks every two weeks automatically not by there choice
|
Armstead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
8. I'd rather not behave like the worst aspects of the media. |
|
If we jump on things like that turn out to be wrong or meaningless, it backfires, and showed we're no better than them.
If there turns out to be real shittinerss on Walsh's part, fine. Have at it.
If it's just a bitter diverse, and even a bitter spouse and lawyers using phony claims, that's another matter.
|
Bluerthanblue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. interesting article here- |
|
I wouldn't want to rush to judgement either, but the guy has a lot of nerve lecturing us about being financially responsible. There are some facts there that are hard to mis-understand. http://www.suntimes.com/6720892-417/tea-party-rep.-joe-walsh-sued-for-100000-in-child-support
|
WhiteTara
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 09:44 AM
Response to Original message |
4. That's as in BACK from long ago child support |
|
not something this week where that b*tch is demanding money from poor poor Joe.
|
Bluerthanblue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. from what I've read, he's paying |
|
currently- now that he's getting $175,000 year that he can't hide. He hasn't payed any of the back support though. What a hypocrite he is- I hope this story explodes all over him. http://www.suntimes.com/6720892-417/tea-party-rep.-joe-walsh-sued-for-100000-in-child-support
|
WhiteTara
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. That's their family values! |
|
SC Teabag chair was arrested yesterday for pirating software. Bunch of bastards, everyone.
|
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 10:27 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Since he is being sued for child support, I assume that means that he is divorced, and doesn't want to support his children.
|
treestar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 11:34 AM
Response to Original message |
10. Why is he even divorced, if he's a tea partier? |
|
I thought they believed in the sanctity of marriage?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 05:27 AM
Response to Original message |