Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Registering Poor To Vote 'Like Handing Out Burglary Tools To Criminals'"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Empowerer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 06:05 AM
Original message
"Registering Poor To Vote 'Like Handing Out Burglary Tools To Criminals'"
Edited on Sat Sep-03-11 06:33 AM by Empowerer
At least this one isn't pretending it's about voter fraud - he makes plain that it's about voter suppression, plain and simple.

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/09/columnist_registering_poor_to_vote_like_handing_out_burglary_tools_to_criminals.php

<snip>
Conservative columnist Matthew Vadum is just going to come right out and say it: registering the poor to vote is un-American and "like handing out burglary tools to criminals."

"It is profoundly antisocial and un-American to empower the nonproductive segments of the population to destroy the country -- which is precisely why Barack Obama zealously supports registering welfare recipients to vote," Vadum, the author of a book published by World Net Daily that attacks the now-defunct community organizing group ACORN, writes in a column for the American Thinker.

"Encouraging those who burden society to participate in elections isn't about helping the poor," Vadum writes. "It's about helping the poor to help themselves to others' money. It's about raw so-called social justice. It's about moving America ever farther away from the small-government ideals of the Founding Fathers."

Most conservative criticism of voter registration drives aimed at poor and minority communities has been under the guise of worries about voter fraud. Vadum's column is notable because he isn't just pretending to be worried about the nearly non-existent threat of in-person voter fraud -- he just doesn't think poor people should be voting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
3waygeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. I've seen this kind of stuff before...
I get lots of e-mail glurge from my reich-wing Dad, and he's sent me several pieces arguing that those receiving government benefits not be allowed to vote, citing Vadum's argument, amongst others.

Somehow, I suspect they don't count Social Security or Medicare in those "government benefits". Dad doesn't seem to mind that Medicare picks up a good portion of the $5000 or so per month costs for his & Mom's meds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. How about all those in the military receiving govt benefits?
Might that shut him up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wilt the stilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Whenever they say that ask them
if they took the mortgage deduction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Cause, you know, there is NO difference ...
between Ds and Rs ...

Ds are not great shakes at times for sure, but ...

As a side note, like ANYTHING ELSE with the right wing and "liberal media," 6 years ago, when voting machine fraud was an issue, the right wing said, BAH, all is well with elections, it is just hyperbole. And, the "liberal media" advanced the notation that "well, things SEEM to be going well, what is the big deal?"

Now, with no real examples of any kind of actual fraud, these lunatics are getting all kinds of new voter laws passed in the sake of ... Fighting against voter fraud ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. So, Thrid Way folks, what is the proper compromise to offer
those who feel the poor should not vote? We MUST compromise, MUST find a way between theirs and 'ours' that 'Third Way'. Please describe specifically what would be the proper handling of this, centrist style. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
18. the Third Way appears to be a movement toward Voter ID's and
taxing government benefits in exchange for the right to Vote.

The Right has staked out a position.

If pressed between no voting rights and a middle ground of Voter ID's and some taxes, do you think that there might be room to compromise and compromise again to the Right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. Scary that it is now "ok" to be loudly public with that kind of thinking.
And that this is a planned carefully constructed message to be fed to the public.
the old, the poor, women, "non-christians", the educated, unions, all are under unceasing attack, do you see the pattern?
Do you hear the history?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. I feel the same about the illiterate
Edited on Sat Sep-03-11 08:36 AM by randr
There is no way the dumb ass teabaggers that can not spell should have the right to vote!
I say give a spelling test at all polling places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. Aristoracy--only the moneyed, and educated should vote.
Nothing new--this comes up every election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. It is new,actually, in one way. I do not remember this talk until the last 10 years.
Historically, it is not new.
Greece's "democracy" was actually a plutocracy, as was the USA originally.
And now the plutocrats are trying very hard to move us backwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. Too bad for him
Every citizen has the right to vote, and so registering everyone eligible is not wrong. Too bad for him that this country does not have his values.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
10. Where do you draw the line when defining "nonproductive segments"?
Is Paris Hilton productive? How about George Hapless Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. True, challenge them with the question of how are
those who inherited the wealth productive?

Bet they have no answer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. Race To The Bottom
endless pit of hate and intolerance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. So "class war" against people with no money is OK. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OswegoAtheist Donating Member (440 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. Weirdly...
...I'm not as upset as I probably should be right now. Which is not to say that I'm alright with the article or its arguments; but let's face it, as reprehensible as the author's opinions are, at least s/he is honest enough to lay the cards on the table. It's the dogwhistles, the argument of 'that's not what I meant', the arguments seeking a justification, etc., that really piss me off. I find the author's candor... refreshing, somehow.

Oswego "now let's make sure that s/he never gets hir way, ever" Atheist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
15. Better analogies
Corporate Personhood
Citizens United
No-Bid Contracts

And who are the least productive members of society? Conservative pundits. They produce nothing but bad, awful and immoral ideas.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demgrrrll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
17. I do not wish this person any ill will but I wonder if he would
write the same words if he were to find himself suddenly completely without funds and options.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC