bigdarryl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-14-11 12:39 PM
Original message |
Here we go again the rethugs up to no good in PA trying to change the election rules |
Llewlladdwr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-14-11 12:50 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Ummm, weren't the Democrats pushing this same sort of idea themselves not too long ago? |
|
I mean, this would more accurately reflect the will of the people, right?
|
drm604
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-14-11 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Only if it's done in all 50 states at the same time. |
|
What they're doing here is being selective and only implementing it in places where it would help Republicans.
|
AverageJoe90
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-11 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. And that's what's so damn criminal about it. |
|
At least Nebraska seems to have a system in which no particular party gets all the benefits.........but not so in PA, if this passes.
|
GOTV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-14-11 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
A Democrat would never suggest such a system because Democrats tend to lose the majority of the counties since they do better in the dense population centers.
I think what you're thinking of is that certain states have agreed to change their rules (once a sufficient number of states agree) so that all their EVs are awarded to the winner of the national vote thus making the EC irrelevant.
|
Llewlladdwr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-14-11 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
6. I see. Thank y'all for the info. NT |
GOTV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-14-11 12:52 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I'll admit it's genius - as in "evil" genius |
GOTV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-14-11 12:58 PM
Response to Original message |
5. rec by the way. people should know about this. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:03 PM
Response to Original message |