Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should Obama have intervened in the Troy Davis case?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 12:54 AM
Original message
Poll question: Should Obama have intervened in the Troy Davis case?
Having ordered the killing of Osama bin Laden, no one can say he is soft on the death penalty, and as a constitutional law professor, it seems like he should understand the importance of making sure the people we execute are actually guilty, and not just that they an unblemished court proceeding, regardless of any new or recanted evidence.

This also reminded me of the more questionable uses of the pardon or commutation that typically occur at the end of a presidency.

Passing up this one would make any later ones for the wealthy look even more distasteful.

Should Obama have intervened in this case?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Even if he couldn't have stopped the execution
He could have at least declared that he stood for what is right. If you can't do that, you have no soul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fruittree Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 04:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. But what was right?
The case was tried and reviewed several times. The president can't get into the business of reviewing individual cases ,declaring a juries' decision wrong then replacing it with his own. Think of the precedent that would set and how it could be misused in the future. This is just sad overall for everyone involved - Troy Davis' family and the police officer's family. Too much anger in the world...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. He's not the King. This was a state issue and the state will have to bear
responsibility for their conduct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Damn, there goes the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Emancipation Proclamation for that matter
I guess Obama is just president of the District of Columbia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Neither of which was accomplished in a five hour period.

Like I said--he's not the King.

Fail.


This shit belongs to a small cadre of people in Georgia. Stop trying to make it a national issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
42. Neither of which gives him the right to interfere with
state criminal cases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. He has no problem sending goons to CA to steal pot from patients.
Edited on Thu Sep-22-11 01:54 AM by Webster Green
State's rights, my ass. That's an excuse for being too cowardly to stand for anything.

This country is rapidly becoming a third world shit-hole.

I don't give a fuck about Obama or the US anymore. I want to get the hell out of here.

Actually, I wish Northern California could secede from the union. Then I would want to stay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. You're talking apples and oranges.
There are federal laws at play that give him an opening in that regard, not that I think that was a well-advised move.

The blame for that execution in Georgia lies IN Georgia, and no where else.

Don't let the door hit you, now. Taking your ball and going....well, somewhere else...isn't terribly helpful. If you have a half a million dollars and are willing to start up a business, Canada might have you...if you aren't too old, that is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Not enough points for Canada.
Probably too old as well. I'll no doubt be here bitching and talking shit for the rest of my days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Fight the good fight--keeps you young at heart. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
31. So if the attorney general gets a state level conviction of Lloyd Blankfein or some other Goldman
Sachs exec, there's no way the president could pardon them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. If a state attorney general gets a conviction, the President cannot pardon them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #31
44. Not if the case does not touch the Federal government in any way.
As this case did not.

The only route to the Feds from a state case is through the Judicial branch.

They tried that.

The Supremes said no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. No. Obama had no jurisdiction.
It was not a Federal case therefore there was nothing President Obama could do.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NaturalHigh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Hard to believe how many people can't (or won't) grasp that concept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. If there's blame to be assigned, he's a handy scapegoat for some.
It does demonstrate a brutal lack of understanding of our system of government, though. Telling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
8. No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
9. There are THREE branches of government.
The Executive
The Legislative
and
The Judiciary

The final appeal went to the U.S. Supreme Court - where it was supposed to have gone.

The Executive branch (which is where President Obama is) does not have jurisdiction over STATE judiciary matters.

==============

Now please tell us what you think President Obama could have done to 'intervene'.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
10. The only thing that may have been in Pres Obama's power
would be to have the Justice Dept investigate civil rights violations and other misconduct of the police who coerced witnesses to finger Troy Davis.

We really don't know if Obama picked up a phone and talked to some official involved in this case. Maybe he did.

It wasn't in his Constitutional power to intervene. We don't know if he would have if he could. We won't ever know.

I'd like to believe if I was president I would have done everything I possibly could. If not, I would never forgive myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
14. How would he have intervened?
It was a state level crime. It has little to do with the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
16. Other: It would have been stupid politically for him to weigh in one way or the other,
First, there is no way he could have done anything about it. Second, there is no correct position to take. If he goes one way he's taking up for a cop killer. If he goes the other way he's supporting the execution of person who is possibly innocent. Better to deflect the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. that's the best response
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azathoth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
18. How? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
19. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
20. Of course not.
Ridiculous poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
21. Probably not the result you were looking for, huh?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. What do you do personally to fight the death penalty?
That's a serious question - I'd like to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. I haven't done enough yet...and want to get more involved.
I've spoken out against it and argued against it in conversations with people I know throughout my life.

But I could do more. And this thread isn't about pretending that I'm personally a moral beacon or anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. Your outlandish equivalency is duly noted. The problem with DU's keyboard commandoes...
is that they really wanted an "activist" in the White House. Activism on every single issue is impossible, and so were your expectations, I suspect. I, personally, didn't vote for Nader, who is a self appointed "activist". I voted for someone I thought could govern evenhandedly, and without the drama of a Nader or a Kucinich.

If this president had stuck his nose into Georgia's business, wouldn't he then have to stick his nose into the execution that took place in Texas also? Otherwise, he could be accused of "racism", and probably on this very forum. Davis' case went before the highest court in the land. Where does one go from there? :shrug:

Your blind hatred of all things Obama has warped any sense of reason you may have had. ODS is a real affliction. I suspect, had he intervened, the same Obama bashers would have leveled charges of overreach by the federal government. He was pilloried on this very forum for speaking out in the Gates case.

The problem with opposing the president's every move is that you have to twist yourself in knots to make a big deal out of things that would have gone completely unnoticed in previous administrations.

Newsflash: Typing angry anti-Obama screeds on the internet is not "activism". Look into it. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklnDem75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. +1000
My thoughts into words. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-11 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #26
48. +Amen. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. actually, it wasn't a push poll. I wondered what people thought and about the mechanics of it
even though I did have an opinion of my own as the OP makes clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Whatever you say.
:hi:




:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
25. It would have been nice, but there was nothing he could have really done
and the issue would have become even more clouded and politicized...The Georgia penal system would have executed 20 black men last night just to prove a point...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
27. It's a legal issue. The highest court in the land made the final decision.
Edited on Thu Sep-22-11 12:59 PM by Phx_Dem
IMO, the wrong decision, but they are the Supreme Court and their decision stands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
35. I voted No.
Edited on Thu Sep-22-11 05:52 PM by bigwillq
What could he have done? :shrug:

Feel free to add answers to my question since I answered yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
craigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
36. He should've commuted his sentence to life. What else is a democrat for other than protecting the
innocent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. No he could NOT have.
President Obama has NO jurisdiction in STATE death penalty cases.

If the prisoner was convicted of a 'federal crime' then Obama could have stepped in.

The policeman that was killed was NOT a federal officer and no other federal crime was committed during the shooting,
therefore there was NOTHING President Obama could have done.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
craigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Bull he's president and has the power to pardon and commute any sentences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. No, he does not.
Edited on Thu Sep-22-11 08:16 PM by Tx4obama
Go read the U.S. Constitution.
The president only has jurisdiction regarding federal crimes.

====

Edited to add:

Section 2: Presidential powers
Clause 1: Command of military; Opinions of cabinet secretaries; Pardons

“ The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.

---

So, in the case of Troy Davis it was not a 'federal crime', therefore The President did NOT have any jurisdiction.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
craigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-11 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #40
49. There's always neccessary and proper and in this case I think it would've made an interesting
argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. You are ignorant on this point of law. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
craigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-11 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #43
50. Maybe. I wouldn't deny that it's been at least a year since I picked up the constitution.
Edited on Fri Sep-23-11 07:50 PM by craigmatic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
37. Absolutely, right after he tore up the Constitution, dissolved
Congress and SCOTUS, and declared himself Emperor (AKA Unitary Executive). Then we can get the Public Option, repeal DOMA, etc., etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-11 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #37
47. + Infinity.
But screw Public Option...the real end game was Single Payer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
41. Read a book. He didn't have the legal power to intervene.
I'm not sure if the ignorance or malice in the OP is more disturbing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-11 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
45. Other: How could he within the law?
A peppery speech, a refusal to execute on the Federal level, and commuting all the Federal death row is all he has the authority to do.

Maybe by force but you are talking pretty certain impeachment and plausible mutiny before or during the fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-11 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
46. Pat Buchanan said if he were president in 2005...
Edited on Fri Sep-23-11 12:33 AM by Ter
He would have sent federal marshals to Florida to save Terri Schiavo. He (nor Bush) could have pardoned her, as she wasn't a criminal. But Obama could have pardoned Davis.

Edit: Some are saying that a President can't pardon in local cases. If that's true, take back that option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-11 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
51. Ridiculous OP poll
Such intervention would not be possible under the Constitution. *rolling eyes*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
52. Yeah right....
And he should also have turned over Casey Anthony's not guilty verdict to guilty and sentenced her the life....sheesh!!!!

It's as if some people spend every spare minute of their day trying to find new ways of making Obama wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC