prolesunited
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-20-09 10:11 AM
Original message |
So Congress passes a law dissolving health insurance companies |
|
Edited on Sun Dec-20-09 10:11 AM by prolesunited
What would be the repercussions?
|
HereSince1628
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-20-09 10:12 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Sun Dec-20-09 10:14 AM by HereSince1628
Congress couldn't put together a reform bill that actually decreased insurance company profits.
|
Armstead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-20-09 10:14 AM
Response to Original message |
|
No ine expected that this time.
Your starting point ought to be whether or not we INCREASE the dominance of insurance companies, which is what we are about to do.
|
stray cat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-20-09 10:21 AM
Response to Original message |
3. DU would complain because health care still wasn't free with volunteers paying for them |
ClassWarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-20-09 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. Why is your profile hidden? You paint with an awfully broad brush, yet... |
|
...you refuse to share your own information. Hmmm.
NGU.
|
bigwillq
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-20-09 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
10. What does that have to do with anything? |
|
Edited on Sun Dec-20-09 11:12 AM by bigwillq
So if you don't share your info. you are somehow not one of "us"????? :shrug:
About to go hide my info. now.
on edit: Is your post supposed to be a joke? I just took a look at your info. While your info may very well be true, it's hardly your exact info. So I find it strange that you're scolding someone because they don't have their info. listed.
|
ClassWarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-20-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
15. Sorry if I confused you... |
|
Edited on Sun Dec-20-09 02:03 PM by ClassWarrior
...with Brew Town and Cheese Land. Those are sooo difficult to figure out. :eyes:
And I didn't mean to confuse you with my post, either. I simply found it rather ironic that a individual who characterized all of DU in one fell swoop chooses to completely hide its own status.
NGU.
|
RUMMYisFROSTED
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-20-09 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. No one is asking for a free ride. |
Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-20-09 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
9. The only people complaining are the top 1% |
|
They want everything for nothing and won't reward good work, initiative, or much else.
Just what's cheap.
Then they throw tantrums because nobody buys much of anything.
Take a friggin' guess as to why.
|
Laelth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-20-09 10:22 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Probably unconstitutional. |
|
Corporations are creatures of the states. Any state legislature could do this, however.
Kill the bill. Forcing people to buy insurance is no more the answer to a failed health care system than forcing people to buy houses is the solution to homelessness.
:dem:
-Laelth
|
Lydia Leftcoast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-20-09 10:24 AM
Response to Original message |
5. I doubt that Congress could dissolve them, but it could forbid |
|
them to offer basic health insurance without adhering to a choker collar of regulations: no deductibles, charge everyone the same, no copays for people below a certain income level, prompt payments unless there is clear, unambiguous evidence of fraud, no annual or lifetime limits.
|
NorthCarolina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-20-09 10:32 AM
Response to Original message |
8. They would have "Supplemental" Insurance policies available the following day (nt) |
gravity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-20-09 11:12 AM
Response to Original message |
11. People would be pissed that Congress took away their insurance |
Phx_Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-20-09 11:45 AM
Response to Original message |
12. When the government starts telling businesses they |
|
can't operate because some people don't like them, we're all im trouble.
What bout the oil companies -- Haliburton, Exxon, etc. Should they be "put down" too?
Go live in Cuba.
|
ipaint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-20-09 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. If they are maiming and killing actual human beings then YES |
|
put them down. They need to be heavily regulated with the well being of citizen human beings used as the primary measurement for those regulations. As it used to be.
|
WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-20-09 12:40 PM
Response to Original message |
14. It would be overturned by the SCOTUS |
|
which is the one factor in the whole health care debate that most on the left have left out of the equation, myself included.
Look at the makeup of the court and think how easily the insurance companies would be able to get a ruling in their favor on a challenge to any bill that thwarts their supremacy in the money moving game necessary for the delivery of health care.
|
TheKentuckian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-20-09 02:12 PM
Response to Original message |
16. How about just cutting them out |
|
no one needs to ban them but you can set it up so they have little purpose or ability to profit.
I was never that hardcore against big insurance but lets not get stupid, this bill doesn't even regulate them to any substantial level, fails to create cost controls, and even fails to provide market competion.
I think there is a huge area to work in between letting them run amok and banning them from existence.
|
treestar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-20-09 02:14 PM
Response to Original message |
17. It would be better to just pass a national health plan |
|
Then except for the rich, the companies would have no customers. Well, for health. They still would be insuring cars, houses, etc.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:16 AM
Response to Original message |