Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Paul floats Obama impeachment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 02:57 PM
Original message
Paul floats Obama impeachment
:crazy:

Paul floats Obama impeachment
By: Dan Hirschhorn
October 3, 2011 03:52 PM EDT

Ron Paul said Monday that President Barack Obama’s targeted killing of Anwar al-Awlaki might be an impeachable offense.

Asked at a Manchester, N.H. town hall meeting about last week’s killing of the American-born Al Qaeda leader, the Texas congressman said impeachment would be “possible,” but that he wants to know more about how the administration “flouted the law.”

Paul called the killing a movement toward “tyranny.”

“I put responsibility on the president because this is obviously a step in the wrong direction,” Paul said. “We have just totally disrespected the Constitution.”

The comments once again put Paul at odds with his Republican rivals over foreign policy and the war on terror in the latest indication of how his foreign policy views stray far from Republican orthodoxy even in a GOP that’s taken on an increasingly isolationist bent. Candidates like Michele Bachmann and Mitt Romney — who included the president in a list of people he commended in a statement released Friday — have generally been supportive of the killing. No one else in the field has spoken out against it.

<SNIP>

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/65035.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Really? And ignoring a CIA communication saying Bin Laden to crash planes into buildings is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Folks had the chance to bring impeachment charges
against Bush/Cheney, et. al. These folks, though, chose to keep it "off the table".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Please
don't get me started on that lunatic fuckwit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, he's a racist asshole. This is unsurprising. Amazed he didn't float this sooner, the putz.
When will that idiot just take his ball and go home.

Maybe he can go hunting with Perry at "Knicker" Head Camp, the ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Did he ever speak out against US Torture policies in the WOT?
That would seem to me to also be an impeachable offense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
30. He did every day
He staunchly opposed the Bush/Cheney torture orders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. Okay, let's not get carried away. He didn't oppose them verbally "every day."
He wasn't in the news or on the phone with you every day, I'm sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Paul is in the news more now for a reason
He wasn't running for president during most of Bush's two terms. In 2007/2008 he was, but he was at 2%. Today he heads the House chairmanship of the Federal Reserve, and he's running about 12% nationally (good for third or fourth place). So what he says now is a little more reported than what he said in 2002, and 2008. I just found out myself he supported impeaching Clinton in 1998 - but not for the BJ. For wars in Bosnia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. It's beginning to sound like he just runs around wanting to impeach everyone. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. Anyone wonder how long it will take until
some of the left says "For once, I agree with Paul"...

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Ron Paul for President!
lol .. at least he'd be easy to beat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Too late...
Already "floated" in GD.

Paraphrasing...in relation to the action: "this is an impeachable offense."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
31. For a lot more than once, I agree with him
He's right on many issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Deltoid Donating Member (694 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #31
38. He is honest on many issues, but not correct
He is dishonest and lies to his followers on many other issues, like healthcare.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. And did Paul say anything about GWB's very impeachable offenses ?
*crickets*

Thought so.

What President Obama did is not impeachable. If Paul is that irate about it, he should draft a bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yes he has.....
it was the Dems and Obama that took impeachment off the table, but then you wouldn't care to hear that nugget of truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Lack of Democratic support never stopped Ron Paul from supporting impeachment of Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. I stand corrected...
Edited on Mon Oct-03-11 04:15 PM by steve2470
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message367202/pg1

Paul said that Bush should be impeached not under the umbrella of partisan vengeance but for ceaselessly breaking the laws of the land.

(link to Jones Report on this site... I think it's not ok on DU to link to it )

and BTW, I already knew the nugget of truth about Democrats and President Obama. So much for assuming about me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
40. I did not assume about you in particular......
but from the other posts, there are folks that think that no one else, Paul in particular, was calling for Bush's impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Convenient...because it's not like there was a GOP house majority
anytime between 2000-08...:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
39. That is why...
those tired old Dem Party excuses don't wash. What is the point of a Dem majority if you don't use it. I think Jon Stewart said something like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. Practically *ANYTHING* is impeachable.
Is it convictable? Well, that's a political
question: can the Republicans get enough of
the fake Democrats to go along with them?

The fake Democrats certainly don't go along
with *US* very often!

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
33. It amazes me that there are people who think Paul defended Bush
Edited on Mon Oct-03-11 11:16 PM by Ter
He hated Bush so much he didn't even vote for him in 2004. In the early to mid 2000's? He attacked him daily. He's a right-leaning libertarian. He is pretty consistent. Free Republic seems to hate him too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. Ron Paul cosponsored articles of impeachment against Clinton BEFORE the Lewinsky scandal broke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. Not gonna happen
The Repubs want this power just as much as Obama does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. Well that does it. Sign me up!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
16. Translation: Paul still whoring for headlines
Edited on Mon Oct-03-11 04:21 PM by Blue_Tires
encouraged by last week's little media boost...

Just for fun, someone needs to call him on that bluff...ohmyfuckinggod PLEASE impeach a U.S. president for ordering a terrorist eliminated on the other side of the world...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
watercolors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
18. Such a miserable A-hole!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
19. I wonder what Ron Paul's DU name is....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. Fuck you, Paul. And your miserable spawn too.
That is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pisces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
22. It's floating in his sceptic tank with the rest of his shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowCosmicSun Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
23. we can only pray Kucinich doesn't join in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
24. There is no better way
to make the idea seem insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
25. Bring. It. On. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
26. File it, f*ckwad.
Bring it on. Paul will be so buried if he tries this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pmorlan1 Donating Member (763 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
27. I agree
I don't agree with Ron Paul on a lot of things but what President Obama did IS against our Constitution. Take off your Party hat and put on your Constitutional hat, people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Hmmmm?
"Take off your Party hat and put on your Constitutional hat, people."

Treason?

Still, take of the hypocrisy hat, which is evidently squeezing Paul's small mind, and deal with the facts.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
28. The only way to understand him is to assume he doesn't know what ANYTHING means...
he just makes noises come out of his mouth to elicit responses from others, like a malicious but very intelligent mechanical parrot.

While it may not have been the best thing to do for the country long-term, it is clearly and unequivocally a popular mainstream opinion. Clinton's blowjob was relatively trivial, but no one was out there (where were you, progressives?) saying "Yes! That was a GOOD blowjob." With so much of the country saying "Good riddance", it's hard to picture impeachment getting very far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
32. Oh, bull. He's aiming for headlines, is all. And I guess he's got 'em.
When you're not at the head of the pack, you have to say things to get your name out there.

But the substance of what he said is total bull.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
35. Dr Paul is certifiable n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC