Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President Obama says Leiberman/Nelson "compromise" amendments make healthcare bill "even stronger"!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:24 PM
Original message
President Obama says Leiberman/Nelson "compromise" amendments make healthcare bill "even stronger"!


"Health Care Reform is Not Reform if it Denies Women Coverage"
by John Nichols
December 19, 2009

While President Obama made a bizarre statement Saturday about how he was "pleased that recently added amendments have made this landmark bill even stronger," the co-chairs of the Congressional Pro-Choice Caucus signaled deep disappointment with the Senate compromise.

"As the Co-Chairs of the Congressional Pro-Choice Caucus, we have serious reservations about the abortion provision included in the U.S. Senate's health care bill," said Congresswomen Diana DeGette, D-Colorado, and Louise M. Slaughter, D-New York. "This provision is not only offensive to people who believe in choice, but it is also possibly unconstitutional. As we have maintained throughout this process, health care reform should not be misused to take away access to health care."

DeGette and Slaughter, key House progressives, stopped short of saying they would oppose a final bill that included the anti-abortion language. But representatives of groups that advocate for the rights of women were arguing that the language would, if retained, make the bill unacceptable to supporters of reproductive rights.

Terry O'Neill, the president of the National Organization for Women, condemned the amendment as "a cave in" by Reid" that turns the legislation into "a health insurance bill for half the population."

Read the full article at:

http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat/507761/health_care_reform_is_not_reform_if_it_denies_women_coverage

------------------------------------



Democrats strike health care deal
By Carrie Budoff Brown and Chris Frates
December 19, 2009

President Obama praised the Senate bill, saying that “it now appears that the American people will have the vote they deserve on genuine reform that offers security to those who have health insurance and affordable options to those for do not.”

“As with any legislation, compromise is part of the process,” he said in televised remarks to the press pool in the White House’s diplomatic reception room Saturday afternoon. “But I'm pleased that recently added amendments have made this landmark bill even stronger.”

He didn’t respond to a shouted question about whether he regrets that the bill doesn't include a government-run health insurance option.

http://fredericksburg.com/News/Web/politico?p_id=1423


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
4dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. BS ALERT...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. Really. Pres. Obama never said what the OP claims.
Edited on Sun Dec-20-09 03:25 PM by ClarkUSA
Same bullshit, different day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angee_is_mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #24
50. yep
yep, damn progressives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #24
60. So you're claiming that John Nichols of the Nation is a liar?
Damn- the cognitive dissonance is running deep here on this board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
40. Obama: But I'm pleased that recently added amendments have made this landmark bill even stronger.
December 19, 2009
President Obama on Health Care Developments
THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release December 19, 2009

STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT
ON HEALTH CARE AND CLIMATE CHANGE

Diplomatic Reception Room

1:42 P.M. EST

As with any legislation, compromise is part of the process. But I'm pleased that recently added amendments have made this landmark bill even stronger.

http://whitehouse.blogs.foxnews.com/2009/12/19/president-obama-on-health-care-developments/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
82. actually, Obama did say that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. How could anyone say that with a straight face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
83. someone who excels at giving speeches could
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Liar. Total BSing. (nt)
Edited on Sun Dec-20-09 02:27 PM by w4rma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. The pressure clearly is getting to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polpilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
45. REEEEEEDICCCULOUS!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golddigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. Who does he think he's kidding?! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
levander Donating Member (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. I am so tired of the political spin on this issue
It's like no matter how bad, they stand there and tell us its good. And, the Republican bashing... It's just stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. Everyone keeps talking about compromise.
There was NO COMPROMISE in this bill. Period.

COMPROMISE - a settlement of differences by mutual concessions; an agreement reached by adjustment of conflicting or opposing claims, principles, etc., by reciprocal modification of demands.

CAPITULATION - the act of surrendering or giving up.

The Democrats gave up public option, Medicare expansion, anti-trust modification, women's rights, and a slew of other things.

In return they got...what?

Not one single Reupublican vote.

Opponents of health care reform gave the Democrats virtually NOTHING.

You tell me: which is it? A compromise or a capitulation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. They didn't give up ANY of those things for a Republican vote. They gave them up for democrat votes.
At least democrats in name. If you are going to make a point, present the situation correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #18
55. I said "opponents" which is not limited to the left or the right.
Normally in the process of compromize, you would be expected to "reach across the aisle" to the other side, which is why I emphasized that no Republican votes were gained by doing so.

That statement alone did not limit it to just the GOP, as opponents obviously can come from both parties.

I believe I did present the situation correctly and you stretched to make an issue out of it. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. Beware, Big Bro is watching you!
Don't you know that in Big Bro's world, war is peace.

Why would we be surprised at Big Bro throwing women reproductive rights under the bus when he cavorts with the likes of Donnie "Gays are Vampires" McClurkin and Rick "Execute Gays" Warren?

As it happened during the Bush regime, killing civilians is still called killing "terrorists." No matter who we elect as President, Big Bro remains in control.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. He's gonna become known as P.T. Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. O'Neill is wrong
You'd think abortions were the only thing females ever need from that statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. so abortion rights are expendable in your book, right?
Anything can be surrendered as long as we get that big photo op at the signing ceremony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. That is so ridiculously unfair I will not respond
Abortion is not the only health care women ever need!

You jumped the shark ages ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
30. It's part of "choice" ... how about you men give UP your insurance on your ED pills? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. And exactly how are abortion rights and less available then they were beforehand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Do you support the Leiberman/Nelson amendments and agree they have made the bill stronger?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. Fe-males? Damn, what do you Males want? How very disrespectful.
This FE-MALE wants choice and the government not to make rules over her body. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. Yes, he speaks of anti-choice amendments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ildem09 Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. I didn't know Orwell wrote for Obama
War is Peace
Private is Public
Capitulation is Winning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Progressive_Angel Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. obama clearly is
in trouble
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Obama got the Nobel War Is Peace Prize, don't ya know?
Obama is just a slicker salesman for the oligarchs that really run this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Obama doesn't realize 1984 was supposed to be a cautionary tale, not a treatise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. It's a continuation of American Crusade 2001+ ... here's the WH Instruction Manual =
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
21. When Obama spoke did he actually say Nelson
and Lieberman amendments or just "recently added amendments?" Sometimes words left out or words put into a sentence changes the meaning of something actually said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. This takes the notion of "benefit of the doubt" to inane levels. Obama's bought an paid for
by the insurance cartel and big pharma. Every DAMN thing he DOES proves it now. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #25
37. Well, have it your way. Don't vote for
Obama next time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #37
49. Will there be a next time? Obama has indicated he might not be the Democratic Party candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. Not only that, but Pres. Obama has already publicly and strongly decried the Stupak amendment.
Edited on Sun Dec-20-09 03:02 PM by ClarkUSA
Memories are very short.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Yes, like Obama supporting a STRONG Public Option while he was running for President? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #32
63. He still supports it as does Rep. Weiner and Sen. Barbara Boxer, but they all support HCR
Edited on Sun Dec-20-09 05:00 PM by ClarkUSA
He can't be blamed for the decisions of a few Senators. SEIU's Andy Stern said last week he doesn't blame Pres. Obama
but he does blame Congress.

:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #28
42. Yea, and we can trust on Obama to say one thing and do another
That has become his sad track record.

Obama is just a slick used car saleman!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #42
65. Repeating a falsehood doesn't make it true. He is keeping his promise to end the Iraq war by 2011.
Edited on Sun Dec-20-09 05:04 PM by ClarkUSA
He ended torture, is closing Gitmo etc. Check Politifact for the rest for some FACTS since baseless rhetoric is more your style.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #65
68. Obama did not end torture. He is still continuing with rendition
which is torture by others on our behalf. Obama is expanding his wars into other countries, without Congressional approval and out of public scrutiny. He is a budding war criminal, since killing civilians is still a war crime.

Come 2011, let's see if Obama keeps this promise, or will he push the goal posts again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #68
72. "On Day 2 of his administration, President Obama reverses key Bush "war on terror " policies" (link)
Edited on Sun Dec-20-09 05:14 PM by ClarkUSA
"On Day 2 of his administration, President Obama reverses key Bush "war on terror " policies, signing orders that end torture..."

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2009/01/23/obama/

Repeating falsehoods do not make them true. FACTS tend to trip you up, don't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #72
73. That was for show! Everything he has done since is a continuation of Bush's policies
including warrantless searches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #73
74. "Everything" eh? Your vitrolic mendacity is very amusing.
Edited on Sun Dec-20-09 05:16 PM by ClarkUSA
It's sad, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #21
41. Obama: But I'm pleased that recently added amendments have made this landmark bill even stronger.
December 19, 2009
President Obama on Health Care Developments
THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release December 19, 2009

STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT
ON HEALTH CARE AND CLIMATE CHANGE

Diplomatic Reception Room

1:42 P.M. EST

As with any legislation, compromise is part of the process. But I'm pleased that recently added amendments have made this landmark bill even stronger.

http://whitehouse.blogs.foxnews.com/2009/12/19/president-obama-on-health-care-developments/

Do you hear the sound of women reproductive rights being thrown under Obama's bus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
48. You're right! He was clearly speaking about the tax on indoor tanning service amendment!
It was the big story all this past week.

Thanks for the heads up!

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
26. Your OP is misleading. Pres. Obama never specified the Leiberman/Nelson amendments.
Same shit, different day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Okay, what was he referring to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. He was being supportive of the process. He's on record as being against the Stupak amendment.
Edited on Sun Dec-20-09 03:09 PM by ClarkUSA
And Senator Barbara Boxer supports the Senate HCR bill because she also knows, as Pres. Obama and others like I do,
that the offending abortion policy language will be removed in conference:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=433&topic_id=75939&mesg_id=75939

BTW, did you ever answer me as to what you meant by "baby-killing industry"?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x8747423

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #36
44. Let's try again. What was he referring to? (I can help you out here...)
What recent amendments make the bill stronger?

I'll help you out... it is exceedingly unlikely that Obama was referring to the tiny concessions made to Bernie Sanders but if you just want to argue for its own sake while provoking a minimum of laughter you should say Obama was referring to the community health center amendment.

Probably not true, but since he didn't say what the heck he meant it cannot be refuted.

I give you this talking point in the spirit of the Holiday Season.

Ho, ho, ho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. You can try to spin his words like a top, but I've made myself clear.
Ho, ho, ho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #26
34. Since he didn't single them out, they must be included.
Wouldn't ya say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. That's ridiculous. He made a very public statement condemning the Stupak amendment.
He was being supportive about the forward progress of the bill, as a President should before a Senate vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #39
47. Tighten me up a little here... Are we not talking about Nelson/Lieberman and the US Senate?
When did the fork in the road come where this discussion suddenly became about the Stupak amendment to the House bill?

"President Obama praised the Senate bill... As with any legislation, compromise is part of the process... But I'm pleased that recently added amendments have made this landmark bill even stronger.” (emphasis mine)

I don't see Stupak OR the House bill mentioned in that statement, do you?

http://fredericksburg.com/News/Web/politico?p_id=1423
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. Pres. Obama was approving of the process and never mentioned the Nelson/Lieberman amendment.
He is perfectly capable of mentioning the names of amendments if he wanted to, as he did when he condemned the Stupak amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. Obama: But I'm pleased that recently added amendments have made this landmark bill even stronger.
December 19, 2009
President Obama on Health Care Developments
THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release December 19, 2009

STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT
ON HEALTH CARE AND CLIMATE CHANGE

Diplomatic Reception Room


1:42 P.M. EST



But I'm pleased that recently added amendments have made this landmark bill even stronger.

http://whitehouse.blogs.foxnews.com/2009/12/19/president-obama-on-health-care-developments/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
31. He said no such thing.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Yeah, who ya gonna believe: your own stinking eyes and ears or "corporate democrats"
attempting to gift the insurance cartel with more of our middle class tax dollars? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #33
43. Obama could sell a Yugo to his apologists on this board
and they would call it a Cadillac.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #43
53. They would never call it a Cadillac.
Cadillac is a gas-guzzling, poorly designed, cheaply built American product.

I'd bet the apologists would never admit to driving one of those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #31
52. Right. The White House lied when they quoted Obama's statement in their press release.

So who should we believe?

You or the White Houe on that quote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. You didn't quote from the WH press release in the OP title. Instead, you made up a false OP title.
Same shit, different day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. OP tittle encapsulates what Obama said on WH press release
Obama ordered Rahm to get Reid to give Lieberman what he wanted. On Saturday, Obama celebrated the Ben Nelson changes to the bill, which gave him his bloody 60-votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. Pres. Obama never mentioned the Nelson/Lieberman amendment. The OP title is deliberately misleading.
Edited on Sun Dec-20-09 04:50 PM by ClarkUSA
I agree with Howard Dean when he said on MTP this morning that he wanted the Senate bill to go to conference so language can be fixed:

I would let this bill go to conference committee and see if we can fix this bill more… Let's see what they add to this bill and make it work.

http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/thegaggle/archive/2009/12/20/howard-dean-walks-it-back.aspx


Dean also "said the Senate bill had actually “improved” over the past few weeks..." this morning on MTP.

Maybe Dean is talking about the Nelson/Lieberman amendment? Gasp! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #58
62. Those that doubt Big Bro, are guilty of thoughtcrime!
Nothing but goodspeak is allowed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #62
67. Those that blatantly mislead with false OP titles get called on their bullshit is more like it.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #67
70. It is you who always ask for when did Obama specifically say blah, blah, blah
about everything, from public option to habeas corpus, from DADT to DOMA, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #70
76. Moving the goalposts? The OP title is clearly wrong.
And nothing you can say changes that FACT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
38. Obama: But I'm pleased that recently added amendments have made this landmark bill even stronger.
December 19, 2009
President Obama on Health Care Developments
THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release December 19, 2009

STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT
ON HEALTH CARE AND CLIMATE CHANGE

Diplomatic Reception Room

1:42 P.M. EST

As with any legislation, compromise is part of the process. But I'm pleased that recently added amendments have made this landmark bill even stronger.

http://whitehouse.blogs.foxnews.com/2009/12/19/president-obama-on-health-care-developments/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
57. Anything Obama says anymore is 1984-speak.
He regrets .... He was hiding for the most part while the insurance industry bailout was going on. He has himself to blame for the suffering that's coming. Happy karma, blind man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
59. False OP title. FYI, 'Dean said the Senate bill had actually “improved” over the past few weeks...'
Edited on Sun Dec-20-09 04:56 PM by ClarkUSA
Gee, sure sounds like Dean agrees with Pres. Obama...

After setting off a political firestorm last week for telling legislators to kill the Senate health-care bill, progressive leader Howard Dean walked back his opposition this morning on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” Instead of advising Congress to vote against the bill for not containing the public option, as he stridently declared on Thursday, Dean said the Senate bill had actually “improved” over the past few weeks...

http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/thegaggle/archive/2009/12/20/howard-dean-walks-it-back.aspx


Oh no, Dean must be also talking about the Nelson/Lieberman amendment!! How could he???! :eyes:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #59
66. Dean did not approve of the Ben Nelson appeasement
and he hopes the House can change the bill.

Dean also repeated that if the final bill looks like the current Senate bill, he would vote against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #66
69. Neither has Pres. Obama approved of it. Dean & Obama agree that good things have happened, tho'
He also doesn't want to "Kill The Bill" anymore and wants the bill to pass so it can go into conference to get fixed, like
I have always said.

Disappointed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #69
71. Oh, is Obama going to veto the bill if the Nelson and Stupak language remain in final bill?
Obama's words are not even worth recording, they are so full of lies. Only deeds count!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #71
77. Sen. Barbara Boxer & Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz are confident the language will be changed.
Edited on Sun Dec-20-09 05:25 PM by ClarkUSA
Senator Barbara Boxer own recent words are very clear:

Abortion remains at the heart of Nelson’s resistance to supporting the bill. Also in the negotiations was liberal Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), a leading abortion rights supporter in the Senate. She expressed confidence that the Senate could craft language to create a “firewall” that would segregate government funds away from any private funds used to pay for an abortion.

“We spent all day trying to address the issue of a firewall, we've made progress and I'll talk to you about it more tomorrow,
for sure," Boxer said. “I'm optimistic that we can get 60 votes, yes.”

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=433&topic_id=75939&mesg_id=75939


And both Senator Boxer and Rep. Wasserman Schultz have been on MSNBC repeatedly to say that any offending abortion policy
language will be changed or removed in conference. Like Howard Dean, I'll wait until the final bill emerges before passing judgment.
Pres. Obama is working behind the scenes with Bernie Sanders and others to press for better language, too. Too bad others can't stop
their whining until then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
61. Our forthright and principled president.
I wish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #61
64. Elmer Gantry from Chicago
He'll sell you a Yugo at Cadillac prizes, and convince you that you got the best end of the deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
75. K&R...back UP to an even zero.
Kicking for wider distribution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcablue Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
78. No medicare buy-in makes the bill stronger?
That's news to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #78
79. Obama is the new slick salesman for corporate America
For the people he works for (which isn't the American working class) he is doing an outstanding job. Did you see how health insurance stocks went throught the roof on Friday?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #78
80. It's ridiculous happy-talk, aimed at people they "hope" are stupid.
How the mighty are fallen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
81. For DU'ers back in town from weekend trips
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #81
84. Here is an illustration where we are in the scheme of things: we are the proles
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WT Fuheck Donating Member (392 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
85. How any Democrat can support a bill that sells every female in the country down the river
is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
86. That's just fucking pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC