Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Public Citizen: Take 5 minutes to save US jobs from Bush/Obama's job offshoring deal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 04:23 PM
Original message
Public Citizen: Take 5 minutes to save US jobs from Bush/Obama's job offshoring deal
From Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch's Lori Wallach:



You don’t hear from me often. Over the past year, I’ve spent most of my time on Capitol Hill, meeting with members of Congress, educating them about our current flawed trade policy and how we can create a trade model that works. I’ve been working to get a majority in Congress to say “No!” to the three devastating NAFTA-style trade deals signed by President Bush that President Obama is now trying to ram through Congress

Today, I urgently need a favor from you.

It will take about five minutes. Congress will vote on these job-killing, unsafe-import-flooding deals this Wednesday.

Take 5 minutes to save jobs.

http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=83Jt6GNmmJnCsR8cymZBAD9tlpxX7gFi">Dial 1-800-718-1008 and tell your Representative to vote “No!” on the three flawed trade deals with Korea, Colombia and Panama.

Here’s why:

- The Korea trade deal is the largest offshoring deal of its kind since NAFTA. If approved, the deal will displace 159,000 American jobs in the first seven years. Even the official U.S. government study on the Korea pact says that it would increase our trade deficit — meaning more job loss — and it hits the “jobs of the future” sectors hardest — solar, high speed trains, computers. http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=YqWEKszABy3ZTDPH7bGSHQihIsWfmrt%2B">Learn more.

- We should have never even discussed a new trade deal with Colombia, the world capital for violence against workers. More unionists are assassinated every year than in the rest of the world combined. In 2010, 51 trade unionists were assassinated. Do you think we would consider a trade deal with a county where 51 CEOS were murdered? So far in 2011, another 22 have been killed, despite Colombia’s heralded new “Labor Action Plan.” http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=XWcjXWcAHgZybQgTf8SEkwihIsWfmrt%2B">Learn more (PDF).

- The Panama agreement has many of the same problems as the other two deals — undercutting the reregulation of the big banks and speculators who destroyed our economy and empowering foreign investors to attack U.S. health, safety, labor and environmental laws before foreign tribunals. But, Panama is also one of the world’s largest tax havens. There, rich U.S. individuals and over 400,000 corporations dodge paying the taxes our communities desperately need. This FTA would take away our current tools to fight tax dodging and money laundering. http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=vzvnleQmaDxqRG3wei897wihIsWfmrt%2B">Learn more. (PDF).

Stop the trade deals that replicate the failed policies of the past.

http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=CPaq38r3avxxDs0YflRh/QihIsWfmrt%2B">Call your Representative today.

Behind the scenes and throughout the country, our team has done everything we can do to try and get through to the leaders in Congress to stop these trade agreements. But it looks like many of our leaders in Washington — both Democrats and Republicans — are siding with corporate lobbyists instead of learning from the experience of working Americans.

YOU know the reality of these trade deals better than corporate lobbyists—and Congress needs to listen to you.

http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=MGqVhgRQrs107PJcXQaWaQihIsWfmrt%2B">Please call 1-800-718-1008 right now.

Thanks for all you do,

Lori Wallach
Executive Director
Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R please read nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. The deal with S. Korea will cost the US 159k jobs. I don't understand why Obama is supporting this
---->> http://www.epi.org/publication/free_trade_agreement_with_korea_will_cost_u-s-_jobs/

It makes no sense. NAFTA and other free trade deals have killed US jobs. Now the evidence is there showing how the agreement with South Korea will cost the US 159,000 jobs.

Why support this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I guess he's supporting it because Wall Street and the Chamber of Commerce want it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
23. Could be because he just does not agree with that
Of course, his side of the argument is not permitted on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dragonfli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. I will call, AFL CIO also has a way to participate (link below)
http://act.aflcio.org/c/18/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=2917

I am with my fellow workers and not the 1%



He is following what The US Chamber of Commerce wants
http://www.uschamber.com/sites/default/files/110905_jobs_letter.pdf
their views are his views (this is to the poster above wondering why Obama supports this job killing stupidity)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. It is NOT possible to push for MORE "Free Trade",
..and be Pro-Labor/Working Class at the same time.
The two positions ARE Mutually Exclusive.

Pick ONE.
President Obama has already made his pick.



You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their excuses.

Solidarity!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. K & R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. Under Obama, these trade deals "protect labor rights, the environment and intellectual property."
Edited on Wed Oct-12-11 09:06 PM by ClarkUSA
"Tonight's vote, with bipartisan support, will significantly boost exports that bear the proud label `Made in America,' support tens of thousands of good-paying American jobs and protect labor rights, the environment and intellectual property." ~ President Obama

http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2011/10/12/general-us-congress-trade_8731984.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. The technical word for that is "bull$hit"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. No, those are the facts, unless you have proof otherwise from unbiased and credible sources.
Edited on Wed Oct-12-11 09:39 PM by ClarkUSA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. No, that is spin from the mouth of a politician
I provided links to facts; you provided an indirect quote from a press release.

Either cite some "unbiased and credible sources" of your own or kindly take your ball and go play somewhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Op-ed rhetoric aside, provide factual quotes which prove your claims.
Edited on Wed Oct-12-11 09:56 PM by ClarkUSA
Here's an example of a factual quote which belies your fearmongering OP headline:

"The House also passed a measure to expand a benefits program for workers who lose jobs to foreign competition by a vote of 307 to 122. The benefits program, a must-have for labor unions, passed with strong Democratic support. The Senate previously approved the measure."

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/13/business/trade-bills-near-final-chapter.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. NYTimes: Trade displacement job retraining mostly useless
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/06/us/06retrain.html

Funny and sad that your choice of "factual support" for the trade deals is the federal program designed to assist some of those who'll lose their jobs because of the trade deals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Moving the goalpost? That's not proof of your claim that Pres. Obama is lying. Here are more facts:
To win Democratic support, the White House reopened negotiations with the three countries to make changes demanded by industry groups and unions, and insisted that the expansion of benefits for displaced workers be tied to passage of the trade agreements.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/13/business/trade-bills-near-final-chapter.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. To win Democratic support? That's a joke. Most Democrats in House voted against these agreements.
They passed with overwhelming support from the rethugs. See the following.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=433&topic_id=795626&mesg_id=795804
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hart2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. None of the past "free trade" deals have protected labor rights or the environment...
Why should anyone believe this B.S.?

Excuse me while I go kill another Asian stink bug...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. "I find it deeply disturbing...
"... that the United States Congress is even considering a free trade agreement with a country that holds the world record for assassinations of trade unionists,"

said Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., of this trade agreement.

Look, Public Citizen finds this nothing but bad, and after reading the article from Forbes, I agree...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #8
22. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
19. It's very telling that a huge majority of Republicans in the House supported these bills
Edited on Wed Oct-12-11 10:26 PM by totodeinhere
whereas a big majority of Democrats opposed them. On the Panama agreement 234 Republicans voted for it while only 66 Democrats voted for it, while 123 Democrats opposed it and only six Republicans opposed it.

On the deal with Korea, there were similar results. Republicans, 219 for and 21 against, and Democrats 59 for and 130 against.

My instinct tells me that any bill that receives overwhelming support from the Rethugs in the House while most Democrats oppose it must be bad. It's another case of Obama siding with the Republicans against the American worker. It just makes me sick.

http://clerk.house.gov/floorsummary/floor.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
21. What kind of nut would un-rec this?
We were fighting the outsourcing when Bush 41 and Clinton did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC