Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Human Rights Group Welcomes Obama’s Decision to Send Troops to Uganda

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 08:41 AM
Original message
Human Rights Group Welcomes Obama’s Decision to Send Troops to Uganda

Human Rights Group Welcomes Obama’s Decision to Send Troops to Uganda

By ROBERT MACKEY

As my colleagues Thom Shanker and Rick Gladstone report, “President Obama said Friday that he had ordered the deployment of 100 armed military advisers to central Africa to help regional forces combat the Lord’s Resistance Army, a notorious renegade group that has terrorized villagers in at least four countries with marauding bands that kill, rape, maim and kidnap with impunity.”

In Mr. Obama’s letter explaining the deployment to Congressional leaders, the president wrote that “U.S. military personnel with appropriate combat equipment” would work with armed forces in Uganda, South Sudan, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo “that have the goal of removing from the battlefield Joseph Kony and other senior leadership of the L.R.A.”

<...>

The Human Rights Watch campaign for intervention, which began last November, included direct appeals for help from victims of the Lord’s Resistance Army in handwritten letters and an emotional video titled “Dear Obama.”

Ken Roth, the executive director of Human Rights Watch, was traveling and unavailable for comment on Friday, but he did post two brief updates on his Twitter feed, in which he welcomed and defended the deployment.

more


Letter from the President to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate Regarding the Lord's Resistance Army

Dear Mr. Speaker: (Dear Mr. President: )

For more than two decades, the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA) has murdered, raped, and kidnapped tens of thousands of men, women, and children in central Africa. The LRA continues to commit atrocities across the Central African Republic, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and South Sudan that have a disproportionate impact on regional security. Since 2008, the United States has supported regional military efforts to pursue the LRA and protect local communities. Even with some limited U.S. assistance, however, regional military efforts have thus far been unsuccessful in removing LRA leader Joseph Kony or his top commanders from the battlefield. In the Lord's Resistance Army Disarmament and Northern Uganda Recovery Act of 2009, Public Law 111 172, enacted May 24, 2010, the Congress also expressed support for increased, comprehensive U.S. efforts to help mitigate and eliminate the threat posed by the LRA to civilians and regional stability.

In furtherance of the Congress's stated policy, I have authorized a small number of combat equipped U.S. forces to deploy to central Africa to provide assistance to regional forces that are working toward the removal of Joseph Kony from the battlefield. I believe that deploying these U.S. Armed Forces furthers U.S. national security interests and foreign policy and will be a significant contribution toward counter LRA efforts in central Africa.

On October 12, the initial team of U.S. military personnel with appropriate combat equipment deployed to Uganda. During the next month, additional forces will deploy, including a second combat-equipped team and associated headquarters, communications, and logistics personnel. The total number of U.S. military personnel deploying for this mission is approximately 100. These forces will act as advisors to partner forces that have the goal of removing from the battlefield Joseph Kony and other senior leadership of the LRA. Our forces will provide information, advice, and assistance to select partner nation forces. Subject to the approval of each respective host nation, elements of these U.S. forces will deploy into Uganda, South Sudan, the Central African Republic, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The support provided by U.S. forces will enhance regional efforts against the LRA. However, although the U.S. forces are combat equipped, they will only be providing information, advice, and assistance to partner nation forces, and they will not themselves engage LRA forces unless necessary for self defense. All appropriate precautions have been taken to ensure the safety of U.S. military personnel during their deployment.

I have directed this deployment, which is in the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States, pursuant to my constitutional authority to conduct U.S. foreign relations and as Commander in Chief and Chief Executive. I am making this report as part of my efforts to keep the Congress fully informed, consistent with the War Powers Resolution (Public Law 93 148). I appreciate the support of the Congress in this action.

Here is the law the President cited:

S.1067
Latest Title: Lord's Resistance Army Disarmament and Northern Uganda Recovery Act of 2009
Sponsor: Sen Feingold, Russell D. (introduced 5/19/2009) Cosponsors (64)
Related Bills:H.R.2478
Latest Major Action: Became Public Law No: 111-172
Senate Reports: 111-108

S. 1067: Lord's Resistance Army Disarmament and Northern Uganda Recovery Act of 2009

Text

<...>

SEC. 3. STATEMENT OF POLICY.

It is the policy of the United States to work with regional governments toward a comprehensive and lasting resolution to the conflict in northern Uganda and other affected areas by--

    (1) providing political, economic, military, and intelligence support for viable multilateral efforts to protect civilians from the Lord’s Resistance Army, to apprehend or remove Joseph Kony and his top commanders from the battlefield in the continued absence of a negotiated solution, and to disarm and demobilize the remaining Lord’s Resistance Army fighters;

    (2) targeting assistance to respond to the humanitarian needs of populations in northeastern Congo, southern Sudan, and Central African Republic currently affected by the activity of the Lord’s Resistance Army; and

    (3) further supporting and encouraging efforts of the Government of Uganda and civil society to promote comprehensive reconstruction, transitional justice, and reconciliation in northern Uganda as affirmed in the Northern Uganda Crisis Response Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-283) and subsequent resolutions, including Senate Resolution 366, 109th Congress, agreed to February 2, 2006, Senate Resolution 573, 109th Congress, agreed to September 19, 2006, Senate Concurrent Resolution 16, 110th Congress, agreed to in the Senate March 1, 2007, and House Concurrent Resolution 80, 110th Congress, agreed to in the House of Representatives June 18, 2007.
SEC. 4. REQUIREMENT OF A STRATEGY TO SUPPORT THE DISARMAMENT OF THE LORD’S RESISTANCE ARMY.

(a) Requirement for Strategy- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall develop and submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a strategy to guide future United States support across the region for viable multilateral efforts to mitigate and eliminate the threat to civilians and regional stability posed by the Lord’s Resistance Army.

(b) Content of Strategy- The strategy shall include the following:

    (1) A plan to help strengthen efforts by the United Nations and regional governments to protect civilians from attacks by the Lord’s Resistance Army while supporting the development of institutions in affected areas that can help to maintain the rule of law and prevent conflict in the long term.

    (2) An assessment of viable options through which the United States, working with regional governments, could help develop and support multilateral efforts to eliminate the threat posed by the Lord’s Resistance Army.

    (3) An interagency framework to plan, coordinate, and review diplomatic, economic, intelligence, and military elements of United States policy across the region regarding the Lord’s Resistance Army.

    (4) A description of the type and form of diplomatic engagement across the region undertaken to coordinate and implement United States policy regarding the Lord’s Resistance Army and to work multilaterally with regional mechanisms, including the Tripartite Plus Commission and the Great Lakes Pact.
<...>


Statement by the President on the Signing of the Lord's Resistance Army Disarmament and Northern Uganda Recovery Act of 2009
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, it appears Russ Feingold will be excommunicated by the True Progressive
pacifists at DU, who are much smarter than Senator Feingold and know that preventing massacres in countries with oil is immoral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Thanks to the unending well of knowledge and political understanding that is DU
I just learned that this is yet another one of "Obama's WARS!!1" and that every single time the US establishes a base or a military facility in a foreign country, it is an act of WAR!!1

But I guess nobody told that to the Aussies... http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2007/02/14/1171405295243.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. No other comments? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Of course not. Undercuts their Chomskyite talking points. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. It has been awfully silent...
Edited on Sat Oct-15-11 06:30 PM by GoCubsGo
Links to Feingold's bill were posted multiple times over the past couple of days. I even posted it myself. Crickets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Scribe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Not really. Go look at other threads.
See, the thing is, a lot of you seem to assume that you can bludgeon opponents with the words of someone they like. I see it time and time again, always from the ardent-Obama crowd: they post Krugman or Ed or whoever saying something as if to say, "You have to shut up now, look at what _____ said!" What that fails to take into account is that, apparently unlike some DU Obama supporters, many people are able to like someone and disagree with them--to separate those things and not equate unwavering agreement with general approval. Madness, I know.

Presenting an appeal to authority only impresses authoritarians and drones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Hmmmm?
See, the thing is, a lot of you seem to assume that you can bludgeon opponents with the words of someone they like. I see it time and time again, always from the ardent-Obama crowd: they post Krugman or Ed or whoever saying something as if to say, "You have to shut up now, look at what _____ said!" What that fails to take into account is that, apparently unlike some DU Obama supporters, many people are able to like someone and disagree with them--to separate those things and not equate unwavering agreement with general approval. Madness, I know.

Presenting an appeal to authority only impresses authoritarians and drones.

Are you talking about them "saying something" critical of Obama? It appears you're viewing a forum in which no one ever posts opinions of say Krugman, Ed, Moore, Greenwald, etc. that are critical of Obama.

This isn't a one-way street.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. I wanted to get my K&R in here before it's drowned out by all the other positive posts.
Funny how threads like this get largely ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. It goes against the "Obama bad!!" prevailing narrative.
This will probably NOT be a positive environment once President Obama is the Dem nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Yup...
it's really a shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Honestly I have some problem with anything that winds up
propping up the Uganadan government to any extent given their own record on human rights, but that said, sometimes you have to benefit one bad group to destroy a really bad group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. This definitely is a case of ignoring a broken leg to treat a severed one
The LRA's one of the nastiest things on this planet and it's a net plus to all of us if they're dealt with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. This is terrific!
4 more countries the US gets to be at war in!

Obama ROCKS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Well
"Obama ROCKS."

...don't you want to give some love to Feingold and the members of the Democratic caucus who co-sponsored the bill that gave the President the authority?

Sen Baucus, Max - 3/1/2010
Sen Begich, Mark - 11/17/2009
Sen Bennet, Michael F. - 3/10/2010
Sen Bingaman, Jeff - 6/22/2009
Sen Boxer, Barbara - 6/22/2009
Sen Brown, Sherrod - 6/2/2009
Sen Burris, Roland - 6/4/2009
Sen Cantwell, Maria - 6/23/2009
Sen Cardin, Benjamin L. - 6/3/2009
Sen Casey, Robert P., Jr. - 6/11/2009
Sen Dodd, Christopher J. - 2/1/2010
Sen Dorgan, Byron L. - 11/20/2009
Sen Durbin, Richard - 11/18/2009
Sen Franken, Al - 12/1/2009
Sen Gillibrand, Kirsten E. - 11/5/2009
Sen Hagan, Kay - 12/14/2009
Sen Harkin, Tom - 11/30/2009
Sen Inouye, Daniel K. - 12/17/2009
Sen Johnson, Tim - 11/20/2009
Sen Kaufman, Edward E. - 6/23/2009
Sen Kerry, John F. - 11/19/2009
Sen Klobuchar, Amy - 11/30/2009
Sen Landrieu, Mary L. - 6/23/2009
Sen Lautenberg, Frank R. - 7/6/2009
Sen Leahy, Patrick J. - 12/3/2009
Sen Levin, Carl - 7/6/2009
Sen Lieberman, Joseph I. - 6/4/2009
Sen Lincoln, Blanche L. - 2/22/2010
Sen Menendez, Robert - 11/9/2009
Sen Merkley, Jeff - 7/13/2009
Sen Mikulski, Barbara A. - 6/24/2009
Sen Murray, Patty - 11/18/2009
Sen Pryor, Mark L. - 2/2/2010
Sen Reed, Jack - 12/15/2009
Sen Reid, Harry - 11/18/2009
Sen Rockefeller, John D., IV - 2/22/2010
Sen Sanders, Bernard - 10/5/2009
Sen Schumer, Charles E. - 7/15/2009
Sen Shaheen, Jeanne - 7/16/2009
Sen Specter, Arlen - 6/18/2009
Sen Tester, Jon - 10/7/2009
Sen Udall, Mark - 1/20/2010
Sen Udall, Tom - 1/20/2010
Sen Whitehouse, Sheldon - 7/6/2009
Sen Wyden, Ron - 7/6/2009
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. We're not at war in Uganda.
Sorry that hating Obama is more important to you than saving lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. And if he DIDN'T do something here, we all know that the same people who are attacking him
would be attacking him for "not lifting a finger while people die" and claiming he doesn't care because the people who are in danger don't have any wealth - in exactly the same kneejerk, reactionary fashion we see them using now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. The fact is that this action will help prop up one of the most anti gay
governments on earth (Death to gay bill came from Uganda). That said, I still favor the action since the people being acted against are worse. But I could just as easily accuse you of not giving a damn about the gay Africans being jailed and killed by the Ugandan government as you did to the gay poster above. The fact is gay Africans will die because of this government being propped up without any requirement that the anti gay activity stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. This isn't about propping up the Ugandan government
It's about stopping the rapes, mutilations, and murders committed by the LRA. In no way does this inhibit the people of Uganda from replacing their current government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. I am not saying that is is about that
but it has the effect of doing so. The Ugandan government is in a stronger position today, than it was yesterday, thanks to this. It is absurd to pretend otherwise. Again, I support the action, but lets not tell tales here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. In the sense that the defeat of the Axis powers strengthened
the USSR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I think that is a reasonable comparison
though I think calling the group we are up against in Africa Nazis is a stretch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. LRA are worse than Nazis, just not as powerful. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
18. I just wish we would sign the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
Oh well - maybe when we have Democratic controlled government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
20. As does the entire civilized world with the exception of the reflexive Obama-bashers at good old ...
"Democratic" Underground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC