Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WHITE HOUSE PETITION: Equal taxes for investment and work income

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 02:58 PM
Original message
WHITE HOUSE PETITION: Equal taxes for investment and work income
I know this overlaps the Buffett Rule proposal, but it's worth showing the public supports it in every way possible.

This petition thing might be more popular than the White House expected: they upped the threshhold of when they'll respond to petitions from 5,000 to 25,000.

My petition:

Tax investment income the same as salaries and wages--no special rights for Wall Street speculators

While investors who risk their money in business ventures make a valuable contribution, it is no more valuable than those who show up everyday and give their time, work, and creativity to the success of that business.

Since there are many tax loopholes and political favors done for wealthy investors, they currently pay a much lower percentage of their income in taxes as Warren Buffett and President Obama have pointed out.

Therefore, there should be only one tax schedule with equal taxation for work and all kinds of investment with absolutely no special treatment for investments other than retirement ones that can't be accessed until old age.

Besides being more fair, this would increase tax revenues and go far toward reducing the deficit.

Sign on http://wh.gov/2Fx">the White House website, and pass around the short url below:

http://wh.gov/2Fx">http://wh.gov/2Fx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Then you should get to take all your losses against your income.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I've thought of that too. Why is it we pay taxes on INCOME but business pay only on profits?
We should be able to deduct all of our expenses of surviving and supporting our families since that's the ''business'' we're all doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. So you would only tax savings?
Then everyone would be incentivized to spend everything. And then you would have a truly dependent population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. that's how it works with business right now, which is why they lavish so much on exec salaries
it's a way for the already wealthy to reward themselves without the business being taxed for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. There was a survey on DU a few days ago.
More millionaires than any other cohort if I recall correctly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. this isn't anti-millionaire. it's anti-preferential tax rates for investors
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Why?
If I can make 10k in income from investments, taxed at 15% ... or make 10k in income from carrying heavy shit taxed at about 25%, clearly one is better.

The idea that rich folks will stop investing is ridiculous. They are so rich that they can ride out any collapse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Done. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. Not good enough
Labor should get a tax preference over passive gains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-19-11 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I wouldn't oppose that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC