Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feingold: sending military advisers to Uganda "consistent with" his legislation.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 11:27 PM
Original message
Feingold: sending military advisers to Uganda "consistent with" his legislation.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/10/activists-react-to-president-sending-troops-to-africa/


Feingold said, “If the military advisors being deployed by the President are being used to facilitate information and intelligence sharing, including among regional militaries, that is consistent with part of what our bill was seeking. But that mission should be just one piece of a larger strategy that focuses on civilian protection in the broadest sense.”


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Really brings into perspective the astoundingly idiotic claim that this is another of "OBAMA'S WARS"
"When President Obama authorized the deployment of 100 armed U.S. troops to Central Africa to help regional armies fight the Lord’s Resistance Army, he referred to legislation he’d signed in 2010 — the Lord’s Resistance Army Disarmament and Northern Uganda Recovery Act — which had 64 cosponsors, passed the full Senate by Unanimous Consent and the House by voice vote."

There are a few topics that DU does well and there are some that DU does cringe-inducingly bad. Just about everything I've read on this particular topic falls into that latter category.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Only the far right and insane left are getting their undies in a twist.
Limbaugh thinks it's persecuting Christians, and the Firebaggers think the Feingold legislation was part of a conspiracy to seize oil fields with less than a full company of soldiers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Pleas from human rights groups, Obama's more than year old law, and Feingold's legislation aside
anyone who thinks that 100 troops (military advisers or not) can secure the oil fields of an entire country is simply too stupid for words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. What you don't understand is that the fact that Obama waited until 2009 to begin taking
action is proof it was about oil.

You can't make this shit up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Of course, it's absolutely impossible that the delay was due to the military
defining the mission and determining the means to carry it out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Well, that and Obama took office in 2009, with the Feingold
bill passing in 2010. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. We're still enjoying that sweet, sweet crude oil
from Bosnia and Kosovo.

And that pipeline through Afghanistan that no one tried to build.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harmony Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Not sure if serious...
Edited on Tue Oct-18-11 12:08 AM by Harmony Blue
Bosnia and Kosovo are areas where the Western powers dump their waste, and in exchange they erect statues of Clinton and Bush. I feel sorry for that lot, but they know the dangers of dumping waste into the ground which can easily leak into the water table.

Afghanistan has a lot of rare earth minerals.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. So, we intervened in the Balkans to get landfill space?
How's that mining in Afghanistan going?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Btw, why do you think they build
those statues?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Nebraska has more rare earth deposits than Afghanistan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC