By Greg Sargent
Let’s just go through some of the high points of Paul Ryan’s big speech today, which is called: “Saving the American Idea: Rejecting Fear, Envy and the Politics of Division.” Here’s the
transcript as prepared for delivery.
To my great disappointment, it appears that the politics of division are making a big comeback. Many Americans share my disappointment...
I don’t know what Ryan means by “many,” but majorities of Americans
completely reject this interpretation of what Obama and Dems are doing. A recent
Fox News poll asked, leadingly, whether people think Obama’s “political strategy for reelection is designed to bring people together with a hopeful message” or to “drive people apart with a partisan message.” Fifty six percent chose the former; only 32 percent — Ryan’s “many” — chose the latter.
More Ryan:
Just last week, the President told a crowd in North Carolina that Republicans are in favor of, quote, “dirtier air, dirtier water, and less people with health insurance.” Can you think of a pettier way to describe sincere disagreements between the two parties on regulation and health care?
Yes, I can: The entire premise of this very speech. The accusation that Obama and Dems are sowing “envy” and ”class warfare” because they’re taking modest steps to slow
trends that have severely exacerbated inequality for decades is as petty and small minded as it gets. Politics is a tough business, and it’s
supposed to be all about an aggressive clash of visions. Deal with it.
<...>
More Ryan:
Obama quotes Reagan as saying that bus drivers shouldn’t pay a higher effective tax rate than millionaires. Well, that’s a no-brainer. Nobody disagrees with that.
Wait, so does this mean one hundred percent of Republicans agree with the “Buffett Rule”? Now
there’s some news!
more Krugman:
<...>
Just for the record: why is this petty? Why is it anything but a literal description of GOP proposals to weaken environmental regulation and repeal the Affordable Care Act?
I mean, to the extent that the GOP has a coherent case on environmental regulation, it is that the economic payoff from weaker regulation would more than compensate for the dirtier air and water. Is anyone really claiming that less regulation won’t mean more pollution?
And Republicans have not proposed anything that would make up for the loss of the measures in the ACA that would lead to more people being insured. Let me also point out that whatever else you think of it, Romneycare — which is essentially the same as the ACA — clearly has sharply reduced the number of uninsured people in Massachusetts.
So Ryan is outraged,outraged, that Obama is offering a wholly accurate description of his party’s platform.
<...>