Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republican files lawsuit against Obama administration

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:13 PM
Original message
Republican files lawsuit against Obama administration

Lawyer files lawsuit against Obama administration for health deal records

By Jordan Fabian

Conservative attorney Larry Klayman filed a lawsuit against the White House Monday demanding that it release information on healthcare meetings with lobbyists.

The lawsuit, filed in federal district court, charges the Obama administration violated the Federal Advisory Committee Act and the Freedom of Information Act by not providing relevant information about closed-door meetings on healthcare policy.

Klayman’s suit refers to reports of meetings between administration officials on the "Health Reform De Facto Advisory Committee" and lobbyists representing the pharmaceutical industry, Planned Parenthood, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, AARP and others.

Klayman said the advisory committee has been tasked to design a policy that “is intended, at its endpoint, to socialize the American health care system.”

The suit demands that the White House release the minutes and final results of the meetings as well as the names and addresses of all people involved.

<...>

The lawsuit was filed just hours after the Senate vote to advance its version of healthcare reform legislation.

more

Someone always comes along to help the Republicans dig a bigger hole.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. hmm when people complained about W secret meetings and backdoor deals that was good, remember? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tejas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Nobody got off their butt and sued, remember why? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. at least your here to spin the Bush years in a good light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Klayman is going to have a tough time since CREW already got the information. As for the Bush years:
CREW AND OBAMA ADMINISTRATION SETTLE LAWSUIT OVER MISSING BUSH WHITE HOUSE EMAILS:

14 Dec 2009 // Washington, D.C. - Today, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) and the National Security Archive (NSA) reached a final settlement of their long-running lawsuits challenging the failure of the Bush White House and the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) to take any action after confronted with evidence that millions of emails had gone missing from Bush White House servers over a two and one-half year period. The lawsuits followed CREW’s revelation in April 2008 that the White House had discovered the problem in the fall of 2005. Nevertheless, the Bush White House failed to recover or restore the missing emails and knowingly continued to use a broken system for preserving electronic records.

Under the terms of the settlement, the Executive Office of the President (EOP) will restore a total of 94 days of missing emails, which will then be sent to NARA for preservation and eventual access under either the Presidential Records Act or the Federal Records Act. The dates for restoration were chosen based on email volume and external events because there simply was not enough money to restore all the missing emails. In addition, the EOP will continue to provide CREW and the NSA with records documenting the missing email problem, the response of the Bush White House to that problem, and the options the Bush White House considered for preserving electronic records, but inexplicably rejected.

To date, the Obama White House has produced thousands of pages of documents relating to these issues, all of which CREW has posted on www.governmentdocs.org. Finally, the EOP will be providing a publicly releasable description of the system it now uses to manage and preserve electronic records, including its email archiving and backup systems. CREW and the NSA will then dismiss their lawsuits.

Documents produced so far show the Bush White House was lying when officials claimed no emails were ever missing. The record now proves incontrovertibly that Bush administration officials deliberately ignored the problem and, in fact, knowingly allowed it to worsen. Some questions remain unanswered. Why, after the Office of Administration told then-White House Counsel Harriet Miers about the problem and presented her with a plan to restore the emails, did she do nothing? Why did the White House abandon -- at the last minute -- a system it had developed to manage and preserve electronic records, despite having spent millions to create it? Did the Bush White House properly respond to requests for records from the Department of Justice and Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald during the investigation into the leak of Valerie Plame Wilson’s covert CIA identity?

Melanie Sloan, CREW’s Executive Director, said, “We may never know exactly what happened to all the missing emails, and which Bush administration officials were involved in the coverup, but we do know the American public never got the full story.” After the Obama administration produces all the promised records, CREW will release a report, providing as much detail as possible. Sloan continued, “The Obama administration, which inherited the lawsuits and the dysfunctional White House email system, has done a terrific job straightening out the mess. Thanks to the Obama White House, a critical part of our nation’s missing history will be restored. This is yet another example of the administration living up to its promise of accountability and transparency.”



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Jump to conclusions why don't you?
If you are predisposed to think evil, you will.

Too bad we have courts who will spend all that time on the legal issues when we could just ask DU to make a snap judgment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Larry Klayman? That name is awfully familiar.
I'll have to Google him to refresh my memory. Is he one of the SwiftBoater funders?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. He and his cronies filed numerous lawsuits against the Clinton adminstration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hey remember when cheney and the oil companies and big energy
companies screwed the public over and they wanted to know who attended the meetings. Well remember how the republcans to a member messed their pants to keep it secret. Cheney even bribing a US justice so he would vote to keep the meeting secret. You know the bribe a hunting trip to the Everglades. Guess he told the judge vote for me or I'll have another shooting accident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Boy
They are all outraged about backdoor deals and secret meetings whenever the Democrats in party but don't care one wit about it when THEY'RE in office. The hypocrisy never ends. They went all apeshit about Hillary's health care taskforce meetings back in the 1990's but didn't care at all about Cheney's energy taskforce (which have yet to be made public and will probably only be made public long after it will do anybody any any good). Now, they are upset about Obama's meetings with lobbyists. Well, hey, "I'll show you mine if you show me yours!" ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. lHmmmm...didn't Bush/Cheney call that stance...
executive privilege?

Very few of the policies of B/C have been vacated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Larry is still around, huh? I remember him well and his Judicial Watch bull.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC