jefferson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 04:58 PM
Original message |
Jane Hamsher Goes On FauxNews To Promote "Kill the Bill" (VIDEO) |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-22-09 05:18 PM by jefferson_dem
Ergo. :popcorn: "Great point of view," Steve Doocy declares, before directing the FauxNews freakshow audience to FireDogLake to sign her "Kill the Bill" petition. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9F_J_sbeU8
|
Aramchek
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:01 PM
Response to Original message |
|
she will be the darling of the Teabaggers now. hope she enjoys their company.
|
HughMoran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
Aramchek
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
11. haha! the bleach blonde hair will be an added bonus to her Repuke admirers |
|
you know how they love Aryan features in their female commentators
|
Jersey Devil
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:01 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Where is Andy Warhol when you need him? |
|
And the viewers, not being total political freaks like us, are saying to themselves, "Who the hell is Jane Hamster"?
But since this will make her famous for 5 or 6 minutes and cause hundreds of silly arguments to erupt at DU, who am I to argue the importance (or irrelevance) of this monumental development?
|
brentspeak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:02 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I believe I found the link |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-22-09 05:06 PM by brentspeak
Oops, wrong interview:
|
spiritual_gunfighter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Yeah that turncoat fake Dem Obama went on FOX |
|
after his administration attacked them. Throw him out of the party!
|
stevenleser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
spiritual_gunfighter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
13. Fox is not a legitimate news source according to the Obama administration |
stevenleser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
51. So? What's your point? That they went on a non news show to discuss issues? How does that help you |
Cali_Democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
12. I don't get your point |
|
Could you please explain....
|
brentspeak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luA0AMP51Gc">Barack Obama on O'Reilly Factor 09-04-08
|
jefferson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-22-09 05:24 PM by jefferson_dem
Contrast how Obama smacks down O'Reilly bullshit while Hamsher and Doocy circle jerk through a three-minute spewfest...all directed at trying to torpedo this "Democratic-led" healthcare reform effort.
|
Cali_Democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
18. Obama went on Fox to promote Democratic ideals |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-22-09 05:22 PM by Cali_Democrat
Jane goes on Fox to attack a bill that would provide health care to 30 million more Americans.
Big difference, my dear. Also, the interviews are much different.
When Jane was on it was a love fest. That was hardly the case with Obama's interview.
|
spiritual_gunfighter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
22. And Jane is attacked on a liberal website again and again |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-22-09 05:26 PM by spiritual_gunfighter
If you watch her interview she is stating the problems she has with the bill because she wants the bill to be better Republicans want to kill the bill because they want no reform at all.
Lumping those two things together is either flat out ignorant or willfully dishonest.
And now on this very thread people are resorting to ridiculing her on her appearance and that she is "inarticulate".
It is fucking disgusting and for the first time since I have been coming around to DU, I am fucking ashamed to be a member.
The same thing has been going on with Gov. Dean.
Leave it to DU to throw progressives under the bus.
|
brentspeak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
23. Insurance 30 million more Americans are now eligible for health INSURANCE |
|
Not health CARE. And now they will have to figure out a way to pay for their new insurance without losing their homes, going without meals, etc.
Using your own words: "big difference".
|
Cali_Democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
31. Some health insurance is better than no health insurance. n/t |
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
33. A lot of people actually DO want to be eligible for health insurance-- |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-22-09 05:32 PM by TwilightGardener
and want some help paying for it. Because we don't have a nationalized system on the horizon to give them direct "care". That's reality--some of us prefer working within it.
|
niceypoo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-24-09 03:18 AM
Response to Reply #33 |
57. Privatization of national healthcare and the institutionalization of private insurance |
|
...all in one fell swoop. The term is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism">Neoliberalism
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:06 PM
Response to Original message |
6. She's such a "MARCHING WITH THE TEABAGGERS" tool. |
firedupdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
She can go to hell for all I'm concerned. Told me all I needed to know about her fake ass.
|
Phx_Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:06 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Good for you, Jane. YOu found a new home on Fox News! |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-22-09 05:06 PM by Phx_Dem
Good, now stay there.
|
stevenleser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:10 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Anyone have a link? I want to see this before I say anything. |
jefferson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
Sorry. It got deleated on edit by accident. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9F_J_sbeU8
|
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:18 PM
Response to Original message |
15. I watched the first minute--she's surprisingly inarticulate. |
|
Go away, lady. Sucking up to Faux News is the last straw.
|
brentspeak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
21. Yeah, I know, Obama. And plenty of Dems, including Hillary, etc. |
|
But they weren't there to run down a Democratic initiative--they were there to promote our side. So fuck her.
|
brentspeak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
26. "Sucking up to Faux News is the last straw." |
|
Your own words.
And Hamsher is a progressive, not a party stooge.
|
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
29. You suck up by taking the opposition's side--in their media. |
|
I don't know what she is, but she's no friend of mine.
|
Better Today
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:19 PM
Response to Original message |
16. At first glance, I see this a bad, stupid, and so on. BUT then I get to thinking |
|
if Jane Hamsher gets on FOX and manages to get wingers to start spouting "our" points of contention, then won't that sort of force their Congresscritters and Senators to start somehow addressing these concerns?
I mean really if she can get everyone riled up about the 8% cap, erroneously or not, it's possible that could get lowered to say 6%.
Just trying to find the silver lining, try not to flame to hard on me, k?
|
spiritual_gunfighter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
20. Why flame a post that is the most resonable one in the thread n/t |
Better Today
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
25. Well we all have to admit that "we" hear more of their rants than "they" hear |
|
of ours. It's time for that to change.
It really takes/took a lot of courage for Jane to step into the lion's den like that.
|
spiritual_gunfighter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
|
and it takes a lot of cowardice to ridicule her on her hair and her being "inarticulate" (which is fucking ridiculous).
|
TheWraith
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
40. It doesn't work that way. They'll just say even the left wants to kill the bill. |
|
It will NOT incentivize any Repubs/Nelson/Lieberman to improve things.
|
stevenleser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #40 |
41. Bingo. After 7+ months of doing nothing but trying to kill the bill, does anyone think that Jane |
|
Hamsher is going to make the GOP machine shift gears on this somehow? No, all that has happened is they can say, look, even this prominent Liberal/Progressive thinks the bill is terrible. They will play the parts of the interview that emphasize that point and cut out the rest.
|
Better Today
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #40 |
42. Probably, but it's always worth another bit of a try. Heck the Senators |
|
on the floor, during the few times I've been watching on Cspan over the past days, are even using OUR perspectives to try to kill the bill. It cracks a window open. Just my hopeful opinion. Screw me, I promise to regain my cynicism by tomorrow, k?
|
flpoljunkie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:26 PM
Response to Original message |
24. Reeks of desperation, Jane. |
kayla9170
(370 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
|
First, Clinton and Lieberman (For Whom I have no Love for) picture, putting Lieberman in Black Face. Yeah, that's right, she thought that placing Lieberman or anyone for that instance in Blackface would be funny. Now she goes on Faux News. EPIC. FAIL.
|
NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:28 PM
Response to Original message |
28. It's embarrassing to see liberals exploited by the right |
grantcart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:29 PM
Response to Original message |
30. lol FOX supports reimportation of drugs |
|
Doocy and Hamsher working together for the working people!!!
|
flpoljunkie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
32. Doocy is an idiot, but anything to 'kill the bill' and Jane definitely fits that bill. |
stevenleser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:38 PM
Response to Original message |
35. Colossal error in judgment on her part, IMHO. |
|
If one makes the decision to appear, write on, be listened to on conservative media, the point is to get the Liberal/Progressive/Democratic message to the folks who typically consume that media. Using the appearance instead to help the right wing develop points of attack against Liberals/Progressive/Democrats is a horrific mistake. Again, just IMHO.
|
AspenRose
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #35 |
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #35 |
38. They have a lot in common in not dealing in |
|
reality. She wants to MARCH with the TEABAGGERS so I don't think she's worried about any talking points she's giving out in fact she's thriving on it.
|
stevenleser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #38 |
45. When I first read this response of yours, I thought you were engaging in a bit of hyperbole, but you |
|
aren't. Wow, she really is aligning herself with the teabaggers isnt she? Unbelievable.
|
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-24-09 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #35 |
61. And of course Bitter Jane knew that going in, before her sad shoes set |
|
foot onto the FOX set.
"Look at me! Look at me!" Jane yelps. "I can upset the apple cart"!
|
angee_is_mad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 05:51 PM
Response to Original message |
39. This need to stay kick |
|
so that so call progressives can see the idiocy of their ways.
Damn, Damn, damn:spank:
|
bertman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 06:29 PM
Response to Original message |
43. Not her best interview, but she made some great points. Probably the first time most Faux |
|
viewers got to hear some of them.
Hooray for Jane!! She's a three-time cancer survivor who is working very hard to force our reps and Senators to produce real reform. I admire her for her fortitude and persistence.
|
stevenleser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #43 |
44. See Wraith's 40 and my 41. That is going to be the outcome of this appearance n/t |
bertman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #44 |
48. We know about opinions. |
stevenleser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #48 |
50. No opinion about it. n/t |
bertman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #50 |
52. * Everybody's got one. |
stevenleser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #52 |
53. We gave you the facts and it is backed up by past history of how the GOP and the conservative media |
|
operate. If you need examples, let me know. Better yet, please provide examples of how a progressive going on Fox has changed the direction of the Republican Party.
You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
|
bertman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #53 |
54. Your "facts" are your or someone else's opinions. As I have just stated in another post, |
|
I personally know right-wingers who have become liberals because they gradually heard FACTS that were presented to them by liberals. They were not converted overnight in one swell foop, but over years they heard things that did not fit with the narrative they had been presented by the Limbaughs and Foxes of the world. Then, one day, they realized that they were being conned. Now they view the world differently--from a liberal perspective.
Your concept of quarantining ourselves from Fox News and other conservative news/propaganda outlets is simply small-minded and scary as hell. What you are saying is that no one can be educated about the flaws of the right-wing political philosphy. That is pure and simple bullshit. Every day, Americans are waking up to the insanity that is the mainstream propaganda on Fox. Jane Hamsher pointed out to the viewers that one of THEIR beloved right-wing Senators was now bashing Democrats for not doing what he had TWICE voted not to do. That is called exposing hypocrisy.
Those are facts.
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #54 |
55. jane hamsher is fucking tool and |
|
"MARCHING WITH THE TEABAGGERS" is just one of her stupid ideas.
|
stevenleser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-24-09 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #54 |
56. You dont even know how silly what you just said to me is. |
|
Edited on Thu Dec-24-09 03:02 AM by stevenleser
Are you really suggesting that I said we should quarantine Fox? Wow, that is funny. First of all, that isnt what I said.
What I said was, have you seen the Republican Party change direction because of someone going on Fox. Which you won't.
I am actually a BIG proponent of Democrats/Liberals/Progressives going on conservative media to engage the audience and to try to change the views of those watching. But that is a long term process, if one thinks that this will be effective in getting the Republican party to change their stance on a bill in the short term? No way. Its not going to happen. The GOP doesnt listen to their base in any case. It (Democrats going on Fox) will only show effects at election time.
The only effect of what Hamsher did was to hurt Democrats.
Finally, you can see how big of a proponent I am of going on Fox and trying to help Democrats and the Democratic cause if you do a search on my name (Steve Leser) on Youtube. What you will not see from me is criticism of Democrats or anything a Democrat is trying to do when I go on. The hosts and regulars on Fox dont need any help criticizing Democrats.
|
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-24-09 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #43 |
62. Threatening to primary Bernie Sanders being what -- one of the |
|
examples of her "working very hard to force our reps and Senators to produce real reform" ? No sale.
Bernie Sanders is something of a miracle. He's the bee's knees. A terrific public servant. And who is that threatening to primary him? O yes -- Bitter Jane Hamsher.
The woman is top-drawer as an artist and film-maker and she's a squawking shrew as a political blogger.
|
ellie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 08:13 PM
Response to Original message |
46. Isn't she just precious? |
budkin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 08:25 PM
Response to Original message |
47. I agree with Jane that the Senate version of the bill needs to be killed... but to go on FOX?? Lame. |
bevoette
(609 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-22-09 10:13 PM
Response to Original message |
49. she's being used. nice. (nm) |
davidpdx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-24-09 06:23 AM
Response to Original message |
58. I'm not even going to bother watching it |
|
I've already taken my name of a couple mailing lists because of her. While I won't say anything vile about her, I think she's going about it the wrong way.
|
democracy1st
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-24-09 06:25 AM
Response to Original message |
59. Jane's going overboard |
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-24-09 06:45 AM
Response to Original message |
60. No influence in the real-world mechanism so she hops aboard the |
|
FOX News shuttle.
She coulda been a contenda.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:34 PM
Response to Original message |