Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In tribute let's name it The Ben Nelson, Max Baucus, Joe Lieberman Health Act of 2010

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 01:27 PM
Original message
In tribute let's name it The Ben Nelson, Max Baucus, Joe Lieberman Health Act of 2010
Edited on Thu Dec-24-09 01:43 PM by Armstead
Just sayin'.....Let's give credit where credit is due.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, they fought long and hard for community health centers
and all the other progressive reforms in the bill.

Screw Sanders, Rockefeller, Kerry and the other Senators who actually contributed to the bill.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. If Sanders had his way this bill would be totally different
Likewise for the others.

And Ben and Max and Joe don't mind providing some help for the people who will be shut out....Just as long as it didn't tamper with the power and wealth of their beloved insurance industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. If a lot of people had their way this would be different, but as
Sanders said in response to the kill the bill outrage, he has to deal with reality.

Got it: reality, the place where votes are needed to pass a bill.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. That's my point -- Baucus, Nelson and Lieberman deserve a lot of credit
They managed to shape healthcare for the next century, prevailing over what a majority of Democratic legislators and the public really wanted.

That is a real achievement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Reality: The place where the American government
is owned by corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. You are just being naive and want a pony
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. What do you mean? I don't get a pony?
Then where did this pile of horseshit come from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. You can call it whatever the hell you want.
I'm calling it what it is.. Historic health care reform and a massive victory against the status quo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. A masive victory against the status quo.......Hmmmm okay,
Edited on Thu Dec-24-09 01:40 PM by Armstead
Stus quo gets millions of mandatory customers, plus millions (billions) in taxpayer subsidies. very little direct regulation and the ability to continue to jack up prices....Any hint of a "public option" or other competing public health coverage system is killed

Um I'm having a hard time figuring out how the status quo is losing much here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polpilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. The Health Insurance Monopoly Act & Xmas Gift Act of 2009.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. That's because you're a pessimist and you always assume the worst.
If you knew what was actually in the bill you wouldn't be saying these things. Read it. Especially the final Reid amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Yeah I was pessimistic about Financial Reform of the late 90's too
Edited on Thu Dec-24-09 01:47 PM by Armstead
and we all know how well that one turned out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Financial reform in the late 90's was the work of the GOP and their corporate masters.
THAT, was a scam. Everyone knows it now because it just imploded 12 months ago.

This bill was passed by ALL the Democrats and the Socialists, people who care about average people.

Do you know the difference? Or are you a nutty Nader type?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Bill Clinton disagrees with you
Edited on Thu Dec-24-09 02:06 PM by Armstead
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_40/b4102000409948.htm

MARIA BARTIROMO

Mr. President, in 1999 you signed a bill essentially rolling back Glass-Steagall and deregulating banking. In light of what has gone on, do you regret that decision?
FORMER PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON

No, because it wasn't a complete deregulation at all. We still have heavy regulations and insurance on bank deposits, requirements on banks for capital and for disclosure. I thought at the time that it might lead to more stable investments and a reduced pressure on Wall Street to produce quarterly profits that were always bigger than the previous quarter. But I have really thought about this a lot. I don't see that signing that bill had anything to do with the current crisis. Indeed, one of the things that has helped stabilize the current situation as much as it has is the purchase of Merrill Lynch (MER) by Bank of America (BAC), which was much smoother than it would have been if I hadn't signed that bill.

>>Phil Gramm, who was then the head of the Senate Banking Committee and until recently a close economic adviser of Senator McCain, was a fierce proponent of banking deregulation. Did he sell you a bill of goods?


Not on this bill I don't think he did. You know, Phil Gramm and I disagreed on a lot of things, but he can't possibly be wrong about everything. On the Glass-Steagall thing, like I said, if you could demonstrate to me that it was a mistake, I'd be glad to look at the evidence. But I can't blame . This wasn't something they forced me into. I really believed that given the level of oversight of banks and their ability to have more patient capital, if you made it possible for to go into the investment banking business as Continental European investment banks could always do, that it might give us a more stable source of long-term investment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. The Patriot Act was historic and a victory against the status quo
Lots of stupid shit it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. Against the status quo? It's the status quo
on steroids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. it's the status quo on steroids codified
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. OK, but that's pretty wordy, can we nick-name it
The Three Stooges Act?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
30. +1
Barry, Joe & Surly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. It certainly is groundbreaking legislation.
Never before has the government mandated the people to buy a defective product without taking any steps to improve the product.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. LMAO!
Amazing how they make claims they can't back up.

Nice fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. The Unrecommends are winning -- It's double-plus good
Edited on Thu Dec-24-09 01:51 PM by Armstead
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
21. If it wasn't good for the HC industry, their stocks wouldn't be skyrocketing now . And if it's good
For them then it sure as FUCK isn't good for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. But,but we're relying on markets toprovide healthcare.
We're supposed to get screwed by them. That's how it works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
24. Is this one of the new bowl games this holiday season?
The Hyperbole?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Good one LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Enjoy the Holiday
:party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Same to you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC