|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-25-09 01:44 PM Original message |
Not good news for the RW or anyone counting on mandates being unconstitutional |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-25-09 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
1. Quick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcablue (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 07:42 AM Response to Reply #1 |
27. i've always been against being the first to reply to one's own thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geckosfeet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-25-09 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
2. Catering to mega-insurance companies is not federalism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-25-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Mischaracterizing an issue as catering to insurance companies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geckosfeet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-25-09 02:07 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. How is it a mis-characterization? The whole process was centered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-25-09 02:10 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. I guess you missed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-25-09 02:38 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Hell of an investment wasn't it. Misdirection of epic proportions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-25-09 02:59 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. "A trillion dollars every five years" Ah, the flawed math |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-25-09 03:02 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. As someone who has subsidized insurance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geckosfeet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-25-09 09:03 PM Response to Reply #5 |
24. And you must have missed the senate bending over back wards to appease them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-25-09 09:16 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Who took the money? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geckosfeet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 10:58 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. You can start here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-25-09 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
7. One law professor's opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-25-09 03:00 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Yeah, overlook every opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-25-09 03:06 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Pro you are as fine of a legal mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-25-09 03:59 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. It doesn't take a genius |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-25-09 04:03 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Like the promises you made of a Public Option in the bill nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-25-09 04:06 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. I promised you something? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-25-09 04:08 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. I said it wouldn't be in there you assured me it would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-25-09 05:00 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Assured you? I made up your mind for you? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-25-09 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
9. That article is about the centuries old doctrine of preemption of state law by federal law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-25-09 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
11. The MSM keeps repeating the lie that Currently, individuals can avoid paying health care premiums, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-25-09 03:12 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. That's not entirely true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-25-09 03:19 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Yes, but they make it seem like you can go to a hospital and walk away without being dogged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blasphemer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-25-09 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
16. There is no chance it would be ruled unconstitutional |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-25-09 05:32 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. I predict if it goes to SCOTUS it will be thrown out as having "no merit" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 12:34 AM Response to Reply #16 |
26. Au contraire. The precedent of forcing ALL citizens to give money to PRIVATE companies is what is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blasphemer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 03:46 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Oh I agree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-25-09 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
23. We'll see what happens when the right case actually goes to the Court. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quiller4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 05:48 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. Perhaps not but his opinion seems to shared by the constitutional scholars |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:04 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC