Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Goolsbee: Obama to Make ‘Tough Choices’ on Budget

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 12:27 PM
Original message
Goolsbee: Obama to Make ‘Tough Choices’ on Budget
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2011/01/02/goolsbee-obama-to-make-tough-choices-on-budget/

Goolsbee: Obama to Make ‘Tough Choices’ on Budget
By Mary Lu Carnevale

Austan Goolsbee, President Barack Obama’s top economic adviser, said the administration wants to “juice” the economy amid signs that the economic recovery is continuing at a gradual pace.

Mr. Goolsbee, chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, said on ABC’s “This Week” that the administration is focusing on spurring investment and improving U.S. exports and innovation to boost economic growth. And he said that steps already taken, such as cutting payroll taxes by two percentage points and giving small businesses new tax incentives, should soon provide some economic fuel.

But he suggested budget cuts will also be part of the long-term economic plan. “We are going to have to make, in the medium run, a series of tough choices, and the president’s not afraid to do that, and I think you will see in his budget that he’s willing to,” Mr. Goolsbee said. But he left unclear just how far the White House is willing to go to meet Republicans, who control the House in the new Congress. House Republican leaders have said they want most federal spending pared to 2008 levels.

Mr. Goolsbee’s comments echoed those of Mr. Obama, who said in his weekly address Saturday that he’s willing to do everything possible to create jobs and grow the economy. To meet that New Year’s resolution, Mr. Obama said he is willing to take economic ideas from anyone. “Here’s what I want you to know: I’m willing to work with anyone of either party who’s got a good idea and the commitment to see it through,” the president said.


Austan Goolsbee, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. 'tough choices' and 'responsible' are always code words
For moving money from working Americans to the wealthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. He HAD his chance to make a "tough choice", but he gave the wealthy 2 more years
If he now thinks the people are going to accept LESS just to pay for the continuation of the tax cuts for the wealthy he's being ill advised.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Maybe it's just me, but
Edited on Sun Jan-02-11 12:38 PM by Jackpine Radical
"Austan Goolsby" sounds like one of those preppy, rich-fuck characters out of a Scott Fitzgerald novel. The impression is amplified because of Goolsby's apparent Roaring 20's mentality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Not just you
The few times I've read things about him theres always a subtle undercurrent of elitism behind his ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 12:45 PM
Original message
It's not just you. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe we need to give Tinkle Down more of a chance to work.
"I’m willing to work with anyone of either party who’s got a good idea and the commitment to see it through,” the president said.

After all, we've only been pouring money in at the top since early in the first Reagan Administration, and these things take time to kick in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. BOHICA, people...
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. I don't like the sounds of that. No doubt, the tough choices usually
fall on the backs of the poor and middle class. The war empire will continue to be the fattest and most sacred cow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
latebloomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Exactly
The "tough choices" NEVER include the powering down of the war machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. The tax cuts for the wealthy are suppose to create jobs
Edited on Sun Jan-02-11 01:10 PM by Angry Dragon
we were told. So the government should not have to do anything.
They should be able to sit back and just watch the jobs increase.
If that is not the case then the tax cuts for the wealthy are/were a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Were a lie? Are a lie, will continue to be a lie, lie lie lie; that's all they're fit for lying and
stealing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. You people just don't get it. Tax cuts for the rich are VITAL!
How else is Obama gonna stay on the side of the People United crowd, whose help he will so desperately need for re-election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. Holy Cow, this looks like a whole thread full of
Moonbats, loony leftists, Obama naysayers, pony hunters, and negativists.

I guess that would explain why I've posted on it 4 times now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. "...I’m willing to work with anyone of either party who’s got a good idea and the commitment
Edited on Sun Jan-02-11 12:47 PM by avaistheone1
to see it through."

The last time I remember the President making a statement like that was his January 27,2010 state of the union message regarding health care reform. However the president was ingenuous about entertaining better ideas for reform then as you will recall from the letter below.


http://www.prosperityagenda.us/node/3271




I suspect this call from the President for good ideas is ingenuous as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. But Republicans byt definition have no good ideas.
Theirs have been so thoroughly discredited I wonder why anyone even listens to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. "Tough choices" Translation: Big cuts in programs that benefit working people and the elderly.

Higher taxes for working people to fund more tax cuts for the rich, cuts in education, cuts in Medicare/Medicaid, cuts in government workers and their benefits, cuts in Social Security, cuts in any and all programs that benefits working class people.

And a Democratic president with the support of many Democrats in Congress shall lead this bi-partisan attack on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. But not a word about the MIC, the largest unfunded liability in world history.
Not even in total, but as considered year-by-year.

Shocking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
15. Code for destroying Social Security.
"But he suggested budget cuts will also be part of the long-term economic plan. “We are going to have to make, in the medium run, a series of tough choices, and the president’s not afraid to do that, and I think you will see in his budget that he’s willing to,” Mr. Goolsbee said."

Those supposed tough choices always means f***ing over the weakest among us. So, he's going to make the choice to privatize Social Security.

They never make the "tough" choices at the expense of the uber rich. Ready for some more trickle down? Get those umbrellas out to protect you from the yellow stream from the rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. They won't propose privatizing Social Security, Just a "bi-partisan "compromise to cut it.

And they will of course proudly proclaim that this is a great, historical victory against those Republicans who wanted to immediately kill the entire program!

That'll be the heart of the political spin and sales pitch used to defend cuts not only in Social Security but even bigger and more immediate cuts in other vital social programs that benefit the working majority.

"It would have been worse with a Republican president".

Sure. But, with a Republican president like George W. Bush, cuts that will be proposed would have been dead on arrival.

Democrats, including a Senator Obama, would have been unified in opposition to them. A Democratic president whose trademark is capitulation and compromise when combined with a bi-partisan Congress make it far more likely that massive cuts in government programs are written into law this year.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. Well, they've already made Defense cuts of $50B...
...over ten years.

:rofl:


So that's off the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
17. Is Goolsbee still the DLC's chief economist, or did he
have to give up that gig when he went to work for the president?

http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?contentid=253912&kaid=85&subid=108
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. + 10,000 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #17
36. yes, he's part of the Trojan Horse in the Democratic Party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
19. "Tough choices" = "prosperity for me and my BFF's, austerity for you"
How disappointing that all of these brilliant minds can't come up with something new. It's always lay offs and austerity programs, then ask questions later. It's boring really. How much blood can you squeeze out of a turnip?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
21. Tough choice: Which cheek of the elephant's ass to kiss?
Edited on Sun Jan-02-11 01:29 PM by Tierra_y_Libertad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. You mean which one to kiss first.
Both will get a good tongue-bath before it's over, along with lord knows what else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
22. Cut taxes for small businesses 17 times?
How many times before we see it is not working?

Are taxcuts ever the solution?

Maybe it's time to think outside the conservative box?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
24. I bet those "tough choices" don't include the 2 unfunded wars or the Defense
budget....

Talking about budget cuts yet they just negotiated and passed a tax cut. :puke:
Thank GOD the tax cut passed :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
25. Well the easy choice would be to stop the fucking wars.
And raise the cap on SS. Budget problem solved. But Obama is just another corporate warmonger fighting a useless, illegal war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
27. Austan Goolsbee: A real man of the people and working class hero!
Your role model and mine!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. I remember a photo thread about Goolsbee in which
everyone was giggling and gasping over how dreeeeeeeeamy he was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. He's "dreeeeeeeeamy"???!!! As in a nightmare?
Edited on Sun Jan-02-11 10:09 PM by Better Believe It
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Or, perhaps, one of Milton Friedman's wet dreams. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
29. The only tough cuts that will do us any good are ending the wars
and shrinking the empire. Those are tough cuts. All other cuts are just selfish cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
32. Obama to poor people: "Tough!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
33. "Tough" for who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-11 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #33
41. Guess. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
34. Goolsbee: IChingcarpenter to Make ‘Tough Choices’ on Budget
Don't forget where the real Tough Choices are and who they really hurt.

President Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
35. protect the rich and make the rest struggle more
must be a tough choice... we'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
37. do those tough choices involve freezing their wages, or clawing back wages?
No expected shared sacrifice from the *ruling* class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
39. bend over. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC