Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Study: TSA Whole Body Scanners Ineffective at Detecting Explosives

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 12:38 PM
Original message
Study: TSA Whole Body Scanners Ineffective at Detecting Explosives
Evidence mounts that TSA’s whole-body scanners are not designed to detect powdered explosives or other low-density materials that pose a threat to airline safety. Leon Kaufman and Joseph W. Carlson’s new study finds that “Even if exposure were to be increased significantly, normal anatomy would make a dangerous amount of plastic explosives with tapered edges difficult, if not impossible to detect.

http://epic.org/2010/12/study-tsa-whole-body-scanners.html

http://springerlink.com/content/g6620thk08679160/




:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Loge23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bullet caps in Miami last week.
They got through OK.
Look, there's no defense of this BS. If we're lucky as a nation, someday this whole TSA nonsense will be looked at as we now (well, some of us) view McCarthy, the Klan, and the John Birch Society - painful lessons in freedom. It's a shame that this process takes so long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well colour me srprised......
not!

Someone found a way NOT ONLY to pick our pockets, but to groom us into being more obedient slave.

Enough of this ridiculous security theater and start using those scanner to scan cargo going into the hold area of the plane. I fear the TSA far more than I ever would terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. plus...the searches and scan were randomly selected......if one in ten
get screened or searched...what about the other 9? It is a money making scam for the machines...and the pat downs are smoke and mirrors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The pat downs are less smoke and mirrors
than they are intimidation. And yes, they are meant to be intrusive and humiliating and intimidating.

They chose my son....a white, middle-class 38-year-old with glasses, blue eyes, curly hair and a goatee...for security scans and luggage search both ways. He travels on business, to and from the US, about 7 weeks in this quarter alone; something that he finds totally unappealing.

It's ridiculous, and it's all theatre; you can get items as varied as explosives and detonators and as seriously dangerous as twelve-inch razor blades in a tube (that was one of the guys from mythbusters) through the scanner. It's all money and myth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. I would love to see cost benefit analysis...
of these damned scanners... versus other technology or even a nationwide intense program to train countless more bomb-sniffing dogs for the airports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC