Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When did we accept the PNAC-RW meme that Iraq and Osama Bin Laden are connected?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 07:57 AM
Original message
When did we accept the PNAC-RW meme that Iraq and Osama Bin Laden are connected?
Edited on Wed May-11-11 07:58 AM by msanthrope
In post after post on this board, I note that some people who have doubts as to propriety of the killing of Osama Bin Laden have raised repeatedly the specter of the death and destruction in Iraq--as if somehow, the death and destruction in Iraq should have washed the blood off of Bin Laden's hands.


What, precisely does Osama Bin Laden have to do with Iraq? Iraq was not involved in 9/11.

We did not go into war in Iraq because of 9/11. To assert that, you must believe the lies of GWB and Cheney.

The Iraqi people haven't expressed a desire for Bin Laden to avenge them, or otherwise represent them.

When you conflate Iraq and 9/11, you give credence** to the Right Wing meme that Osama Bin Laden and Iraq are somehow connected.

They are not.

Osama Bin Laden died because he killed 3,000 Americans.
We went to war in Iraq because of the desire for wealth and power on the part of PNAC and their ilk.

Only foolish people, IMHO, buy into the right-wing meme that 9/11 and Iraq have anything to do with each other.
And, to paraphrase our President, people who equate the death of Bin Laden with the deaths of innocent Iraqis need their heads examined.



**Knowingly or unknowingly?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent, excellent post. If I could recommend 10 times, I would. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Thank you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't know. When did you accept that? (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Never. I just wondered at the conflation I see from some posters
who claim that Iraq has something to do with Bin Laden.

As if the sins of PNAC washed away the guilt of Osama.


I'm perfectly okay with accepting the truth of these two realities---

1) Bin Laden got shot for killing 3,000 Americans.

2) Iraq happened because PNAC and their ilk wanted it to.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. Who's 'we'?
It sounds more like false equivalency on the part of the hand-wringers, than an actual connection between Iraq and OBL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. YOu are correct--and I think it's time to challenge that false equivalency.
because it is based on acceptance of a right-wing meme....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. Huh? What right-wing meme?
The US killed hundreds of thousands for no good reason at all. What meme are you talking about?

Why is it a false equivalency?

3,000 innocents vs. 300,000 innocents? (or more?)

You're right... it isn't equivalent at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. Not me, never. Thanks for posting this. A good reminder n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. Completely agree. I am shocked at the amount of * apologist on here.
Edited on Wed May-11-11 09:55 AM by Arctic Dave
Dead OBL = So what, he was a terrorist. (would have been much much better to get him alive IMHO)

Iraq = War crime by * and his entire top cabinet members.(There is no grey area for this)

Now if Obama can keep from bombing every country in the region we might be able to finally call off this entire charade. Me thinks he is in love with Predator strikes though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Fux Ewes has a healthy little colony on here. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
9. What are some people saying? "...as if somehow, the death and destruction in Iraq should
have washed the blood off of Bin Laden's hands."

Are they saying that killing OBL is questionable, because we did worse by invading and occupying Iraq?

i.e. they are saying you can't be against the war on Iraq and for killing OBL? - so these would be anti-Capital Punishment types saying that sort of thing? - against any and all killing and against any and all wars of any kind for whatever reason.

While I don't necessarily agree with it, that is a recognizable moral position that is out there. I don't think such positions are predicated on anything like the comparison of one set of crimes to another and either equating them morally, or ranking crimes so we can determine how to react to/punish them. I believe the claim is that evil is what it is and their concern is with how we respond to it.

I'm not sure I understand what their position is as you describe it, but I agree with your position. OBL did the murders & destruction in NYC, BECAUSE he was a religious extremist. Iraq had nothing to do with that because he was a SECULARIST.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
10. OBL did 9/11 BECAUSE he was a religious extremist. Saddam Hussein WAS A SECULARIST.
Edited on Wed May-11-11 10:04 AM by patrice
OBL hated Saddam Hussein. He even had a camp on the border of Saudi Arabia and Iraq for some time, the purpose of which was to recruit religious radicals in the region to go into Iraq and cause Saddam Hussein trouble.

They hated each other. They would have been at cross purposes if they had worked together. Their purposes would have cancelled each other out if they had shared the 9/11 project.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
12. The ONLY relationship that exists is the commonality of 2 countries killing innocents.
OBL killed thousands of innocents and therefore deserves death, without trial, at the hands of what is essentially an execution squad.

The US killed hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis... so would it be a massive surprise if you found out that some people over there feel that US personnel deserve the same?

THAT is the problem with setting the precedent that it is acceptable to determine what is justice without a court of law involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Thank you, B!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. You are most welcome, my dear Patrice.
I am sure now people will say I am making Bin Laden into a "good guy" or some sort of similar thing... sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. Why would a court of law be involved?
Congress gave the president the authority on Sept 14 2001 to proceed under the AUMF.

Now, is the Iraqi parliment about to issue the same?

Because otherwise, you are arguing apples and oranges.

To dispel ANOTHER RW meme I've found on this site--Obama is a duly elected head of state. Osama is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
15. I always forget that -
not all of the posters have been here since the beginning, and have not had the benefit of the many years of intensive research/debunking/exposing that have gone on about Bin Laden/Afghanistan/Iraq over the early years of DU.

In some of the recent Bin Laden threads, I was shocked to see so many who unaware of basic things we have long known to be true.

As for this:

"Osama Bin Laden died because he killed 3,000 Americans."

That, too, is a meme that should be dismissed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
18. And since when was it proven that OBL had anything to do with 9/11 ... FBI doesn't know that --!!
No one knows that -- OBL was the authorized "patsy" for 9/1l -- that's all!

US/CIA created/funded the Taliban/Al Qaeda -- we had 24/7 surveillance of that organization

and funded it up to 9/11 -- !!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC