Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Al Franken, HuffPo: The Hardest Vote I've Taken

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 08:35 PM
Original message
Al Franken, HuffPo: The Hardest Vote I've Taken
The Hardest Vote I've Taken

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/al-franken/the-hardest-vote-ive-take_b_796716.html

A lot of people are unhappy that the president punted on first down, and I'm one of them. Extending the excessive Bush tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires will explode our deficit over the next two years without doing anything to help our economy. I think it's simply bad policy.

But for Minnesota's middle class, struggling to get by in a tough economy, there's a lot in this bill that will really help: tax cuts for working families, a payroll tax holiday, energy tax credits, and the extension of Recovery Act initiatives that are already making a difference.

And for the Minnesotans truly suffering right now -- men, women, and children on the edge of economic disaster -- the alternative is simply unacceptable. If we let Republicans block unemployment benefits, even temporarily, there will be a lot more pain for working families, a lot more homeless kids spending Christmas in a shelter or a car.

If this is the prelude of a permanent extension of the Bush tax breaks for the super-wealthy, we're in big trouble. We'll lose our ability to make the investments we need to grow our way out of long-term budget deficits: education, infrastructure, and research and development. And I am taking the president at his word that he will fight harder to put an end to these wasteful tax breaks in 2012 than he did in 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Seems to be a lot of CYA "I couldn't help myself" statements going around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Not to mention the whole deal was designed to entrap support like this.
Edited on Tue Dec-14-10 09:08 PM by L. Coyote
Los sin cajones are in charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Call it what it is. A republican shakedown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Riley18 Donating Member (883 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sadly it sounds like Franken would rather get reelected than
say the truth. He is no Grayson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Whatever.
I kind of can't care anymore. It doesn't matter what cause I give to, or fight against, or protest with, or campaign against. No one is listening and nobody cares.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wackywaggin Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Whatever, seconded!
Heretic Wack! :0)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golddigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. With extreme sadness, I have to agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Or, as I was told at a young age, be true to yourself because no one else will be.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Whatever works for me. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peregrine Took Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. To hell with principles - I want to reserve my place at the government trough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
11. I disagree with his choice but still like him.
Edited on Tue Dec-14-10 09:13 PM by Forkboy
I know, on DU I'm supposed to fully love or fully hate everyone so people can score their points....

Of course, I might have more confidence in this if half the people arguing for it weren't among those arguing against it when Bush did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
35. rational, sane arguments don't belong here.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
38. me too
It's hard to vote against the standing president when he's in your party and he tells you I really need you to do this. Being a politician isn't always fun. Sometimes you feel the need to pass bill you don't believe in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hulka38 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. Disappointed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
33. Disappointed +. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. No yarbles
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. Like eating your seed corn Al
There must be something in the water there. I dunno. So disappointing. I give up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
15. Next time Al - JUST SAY NO!
jeez....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
17. Just you wait, Henry Higgins, just you wait...
You're gonna have plenty more distasteful mish-mashes of rearguard appeasement to yea or nay on in the next few years...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCaliDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. A hard choice for Al
but it's better than divide and conquer. He did the right thing, and I support him for it. The last thing we need to do is have the Democratic Party weakened by principled Liberals who would rather see the Democratic Party fail, than to understand this is NOT Utopia.

If you wanna know why this tax bill went through, just look at the cohesiveness of the Republican Party. Tea-Bagger, Moderate, Rightwinger, when it comes down to it, they stand together.

United We Stand. Divided We Fall.

What part of that don't the Ultra-left Liberals understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hulka38 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I stopped playing follow the leader at around 6.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCaliDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. And I wised up and knew the world didn't evolve around me at the same age. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hulka38 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Truth trumps party
and any other affiliation. The conditions you set for yourself obscure your view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCaliDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Unity trumps egotism. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. So there is NO circumstance over which you'd break party ranks?
Edited on Wed Dec-15-10 05:16 PM by Pholus
Impressive.

I guess.

Course that's why I can't stand conservatives. Lock step, pretzel logic to rationalize every screwed up move.

Oh well, works for you...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCaliDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. I don't cut my nose to spite my face, no.
Edited on Wed Dec-15-10 06:52 PM by BlueCaliDem
I'm not a sucker for self-inflicted pain and self-righteous martyrdom.

Oh well, works for you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. Jim Jones had Unity. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCaliDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Wrong. He had GUNS. You should read up on his cult
and realize just how much the Professional Left and their lockstep herd resemble Jim Jones and his congregation have in common. It's astounding, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. Professional Left? now there is lockstep terminology for ya. He had Koolaid.nt
Edited on Wed Dec-15-10 08:18 PM by Snotcicles
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCaliDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #39
44. The people did not drink the poisoned Kool-Aid without Jones' GUNS on them.
It was NOT voluntary. Survivors talk about this all the time. Jones didn't get unity from his people because of Kool-Aid. He got it with GUNS.

And yes, the Professional Left: Hamsher, Greenwald, Schultz, even Bernie Sanders who, and of course you know this, has seen funds pouring into his campaign coffers for his 2012 reelection since his filibustering.

All the above make their money off of the passions of the Left making them the Professional Left. It's not a bad thing. Actually, it's a good thing people do that, but it does make them the Professional Left because they sell a leftist p.o.v. and get paid for it. You do understand that concept, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnlucas Donating Member (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #25
42. Unity under the wrong banner is Idiocy
The Tea Party is united.
They're also stupid, wrong, misled.

Unity without context does no one no favors.
Unite under something worthwhile.
In other words, you're using your unity skills wrong.

If it ain't for the good of all citizens, then it ain't worth uniting under.
John Lucas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCaliDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. Agreed, but who decides what banner's idiocy?
Edited on Thu Dec-16-10 11:29 AM by BlueCaliDem
You?

Allowing the tax cuts to expire ain't good for all citizens, so it ain't worth uniting under. Right?

Once again, the Left and their Leaders, the Professional Left {they DO make money off of your passion and the current controversy, too, don't you know? That makes them Professional, right?} are disemboweling the ONLY party strong enough, big enough, and funded enough, that stands between the Corporate Elite Party {GOP} and the working people. The Democratic Party.

The Professional Left and their followers are cutting their collective noses to spite their collective faces, and strengthening the Republican Party and their fanatical voters who, no matter how wrong they are, do seem to understand the concept of "united we stand, divided we fall". At least they're smart enough to understand that.

I just wish the Left would find a way to understand, and grasp, that concept, too. And not only right before voting for Democrats, but in full understanding that campaigning is a perpetual concept in this country, and attacking, criticizing, and putting down those pols who share their views the most, are being weakened by their constant rancor, and those who hate them, are served by it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. God forbid the Democratic party actually stand and fight for something
Edited on Tue Dec-14-10 11:18 PM by dflprincess
The Republicans stick together because they know the Democrats will cave in and give them what they want.

This deal went through because Obama cut a back room deal with Republicans. Just as he cut single payer advocates out of the health care discussion he cut Congressional Democrats out of these talks - then had a snit when his latest sell out was questioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCaliDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. Hard to fight when you're being torn apart from the inside out, isn't it?
Edited on Wed Dec-15-10 01:34 AM by BlueCaliDem
The Republicans stick together because they know Democrats will cave because Congressional Democrats are secretly aligned with the Republicans - in everything. If the 94-3 vote against giving President Obama funds to realize his campaign promise to close Gitmo, and bring detainees into the United States for trial - just like ALL the Liberals wanted to see happen - doesn't tell you the above is true, then you haven't been paying attention.

This deal went through because the President, since July this year, has been pushing Congressional Democrats to pass a bill to ensure tax cuts for the 98% of Americans didn't expire come January 1, and Congressional Democrats had been DEAF, DUMB, and BLIND.

The President's been after them month after month after month since. FrenchieCat has posted a timeline in the Barack Obama Group IF you're interested. It shows how Congressional Democrats punted, and punted, and punted, and even waited until AFTER the elections to do anything about it, completely ignoring him.

But I bet you didn't read that in Jane Hamsher's blog, did ya? Or in Glenn Greenwald's blog. Or heard Cenk Uyger rant about it. No. Corporate media, of all friggin sources, reported on it. Barely, but they did.

But you keep blaming the President. You keep it up. Keep discouraging yourself and others so that when it's 2012, you'll have a solid excuse why a Republican wins the WH, and the Senate is tossed back into the RepubliCONS column. But at least you'll have your anger and self-righteous principles to keep you warm and fuzzy until the next Democrat comes along you can bash because he/she isn't Liberal enough for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Al the wise played this cruddy hand. You got your unity, but this was a back-room deal.

And it stank to high heaven.

One final note. Stop blaming the DFH's for 2012 in advance if Mr. Obama's bipartisanship doesn't work. The last meme pushed out during this debate was that people appalled by this capitulation were the "insignificant 15%" of the party so you'd better get your messaging straight. Are we the lunatic fringe who doesn't matter a bit in the calculations or are we the reason it's all going to come crashing down in 2012?

When forced with a choice between Republican and Republican-light, the electorate has chosen the "real thing" time and time again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCaliDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Once again, mosey on to the Barack Obama Group for the timeline
and you'll see just how wrongheaded your assertion is regarding "backroom deals". Congressional Democrats were NOT willing, although veeery able, to extend tax cuts for the lower 98% and to allow expiration of tax cuts for the top 2%, but they punted, punted, punted. They refused to even bring up debate of it before the elections. But you know that, of course, even though you'll place the blame squarely in President Obama's lap. Yeah, that REEKS to high heaven, all right.

But of course, President Obama was "Republican-lite" for having to turn to the RepubliCONS in the 11th hour to find a way to stop expiration of the Child Tax Credit, the EIC, while pushing for an extension of unemployment benefits, and for stopping the expiration of tax cuts for the lower 98% in what some egocentric purists are dubbing a "backroom deal".

"The last meme pushed out during this debate was that people appalled by this capitulation were the "insignificant 15%" of the party so you'd better get your messaging straight."

What percentage was it again in Florida 2000 that voted for Nader over Gore, and what cost him about 97,000 votes so Dubya could be anointed pResident again? Refresh my memory, please. Was it 10%? That's a helluva lot less than your 15% (actually, the ultra-left Liberals make up about 20-22% of the American voting electorate}.

So yeah, you betcha the Professional Left and their loyalists will be blamed by the Democrats should it all come 'crashing down' in 2012. And deservedly so. Be rest assured, the African-American community will be sorely p*ssed off at those lily-white Professional Leftists {Hamsher, Greenwald, Olbermann, Uygur} for being instrumental in discrediting America's first, black President since they are very well aware that Clinton's triangulation during his presidency didn't seem to hurt their bleeding little hearts half as much. Count on it.

Call me racist, call me whatever, but fact remains, this is how the African-American community WILL SEE an eventual defeat of America's first African-American President, just like the Professional Left WILL CONTINUE TO BELIEVE that punishing this President with losing the House in last election was a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Well, you guys won didn't you? It's up to YOU to deliver. Wait till you FAIL before you blame.
Edited on Wed Dec-15-10 05:19 PM by Pholus
So to summarize your position -- due to numbers my opinion doesn't matter and in fact I MUST keep quiet for party unity. However, when this deal goes south you reserve the right to blame me. Tell you what, if it is a Nader-esque margin (or even closer than the "15%" of democrats you can blame me as long as if you lose by a bigger margin you admit that the entire deal was not wise to begin with.

That timeline is cool, course it goes back to early summer. Why not earlier? My problem is that this should have been rolling around in the background far earlier.

And finally it's okay. I still like you, despite your threats. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
20. Wimp ...
and a schmuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
24. "I am taking the president at his word that he will fight harder"
Did he sleep through the movie or what
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillwaiting Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
28. Boo Franken! Booooooooo ooooooooooo ooooooooooo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
29. Sometimes good politicians have to do bad things
I agree with Al on this one and if that makes me whatever name you wanna call me, then so be it. The ReThugs are great at being obstructionists. It seems that's all their party is about these days. I'm sure in 2 years, after this tax cut deal is passed, they will use it against Obama and the Dem party but there are lots of good things in this Bill no one seems to be talking about. Do I want to see the richest get a break instead of an increase? Hell no! Do I want to see the unemployment benefits continue? Hell yes. Do I want MY tax break (cause I'm one of the lucky ones that still has a job)? Hell yes! It's a hell of a pickle the government has gotten themselves into and to say Al Franken is a sellout because of this one vote, when he's done so much good in Congress is, well, ridiculous. There isn't a (great) politician in history, who hasn't had to make a vote he didn't care for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
40. Unrec for another one making excuses while he votes the wrong way. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1badjedi Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC