|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:23 PM Original message |
I hate to say it but Weiner may be fried |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxsolomon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. keep buying what they're selling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawson Leery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Parker CA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:36 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. Amazing how quickly some on the left run from our own at a Breitbart-contrived "scandal." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:22 PM Response to Reply #11 |
55. Deleted message |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:34 PM Response to Reply #11 |
63. "...one of our own..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Merlot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:37 PM Response to Reply #11 |
67. on the left or "on the left?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:43 PM Response to Reply #11 |
71. That's an unnecessarily rude reply. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Parker CA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 09:00 PM Response to Reply #71 |
78. It's tough for me not to automatically assume that any story originating from Breitbart is not 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheMadMonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 11:42 PM Response to Reply #71 |
113. Automatically abandoning anyone "tainted" by a hint of manufactured... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-01-11 12:22 AM Response to Reply #71 |
119. Deleted message |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:37 PM Response to Reply #1 |
12. Well, ACORN WAS fried |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:53 PM Response to Reply #12 |
34. ACORN workers are fighting back also. ACORN was betrayed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 10:00 PM Response to Reply #34 |
98. It doesn't matter if ACORN employees are fighting back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-01-11 01:17 PM Response to Reply #98 |
137. Yes, but that couldn't have happened without the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:38 PM Response to Reply #1 |
17. Edwards. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxsolomon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:14 PM Response to Reply #17 |
47. Vitter, Craig, Gingrich, Sanford |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:27 PM Response to Reply #47 |
57. I'm not disputing that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 10:04 PM Response to Reply #1 |
102. +1 - I can't believe anyone would believe Breitbart - especially here. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-01-11 01:32 AM Response to Reply #1 |
125. consider the source. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
3. Enquirer had more credibility than Breitbart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:31 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. How does Breitbart enter this discussion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:33 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Because this stupid story emanates from his website |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Parker CA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:34 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. This BS story started from Breitbart. That's all anyone should need to know. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pintobean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:38 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Good luck with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:50 PM Response to Reply #10 |
28. I'll bookmark this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Parker CA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:59 PM Response to Reply #28 |
39. Seems like you're hoping for a self-fulfilling prophecy here. Amazing people on this site give more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:06 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Fuck Breitbart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheMadMonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-01-11 12:20 AM Response to Reply #41 |
118. "I know what you are doing and I am refusing to play your game" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
individual rights (85 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:20 PM Response to Reply #10 |
52. Wouldn't you prefer to know the truth? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:45 PM Response to Reply #7 |
24. The story wouldn't exist without Breitbart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:56 PM Response to Reply #24 |
35. It never matters where it started - only where it ends. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:32 PM Response to Reply #35 |
61. Yep! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 10:15 PM Response to Reply #35 |
105. That's true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheMadMonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-01-11 12:30 AM Response to Reply #35 |
120. He can answer. Problem is whether or not he can answer the obvious... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-01-11 12:35 AM Response to Reply #120 |
121. So why not answer the first. If he can answer, answer what he can. Call for a proper investigation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheMadMonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-01-11 02:14 AM Response to Reply #121 |
127. Circumstances prevent him giving any proper/honest answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-01-11 02:18 AM Response to Reply #127 |
128. Bull. "I WELCOME authorities and ask them to investigate this crime." Proper and honest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:10 PM Response to Reply #24 |
43. If so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 10:04 PM Response to Reply #43 |
101. What, me worry? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
4. Deleted message |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:37 PM Response to Reply #4 |
14. Have you stopped beating yours? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue37 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 11:17 PM Response to Reply #14 |
110. He is not "lawyered up." He has his lawyers looking into the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-01-11 12:39 AM Response to Reply #110 |
122. Hiring lawyers is not "investigating." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue37 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-01-11 12:47 AM Response to Reply #122 |
123. We don't know that he hasn't. He did say they were looking into both civil and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-01-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #123 |
124. Yeah, You clear that up by telling reporters when they ask |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:38 PM Response to Reply #4 |
16. Deleted message |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
5. The Weiner Wins Big IMHO..........he ain't fried..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abelenkpe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
6. Thought it was just more lies from Brietbart? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imajika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:34 PM Response to Original message |
9. Yeah, he's not being straightfoward... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftygolfer (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
13. Wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:40 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. If I remember correctly Weiner and Obama were best of friends in college |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Journeyman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:46 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. Unless Obama is host of "The Daily Show". . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:57 PM Response to Reply #25 |
38. Well you very well may be right now that I think about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:40 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. Could be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
20. mmmmm... fried weiners |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:41 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. LOL. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fuzz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
22. It's gotta be a fake, I can't believe he's that well hung. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-01-11 01:33 AM Response to Reply #22 |
126. Stewart said "He's a lot more Anthony and a lot less Weiner" of the pic lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justitia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:44 PM Original message |
Maybe he sent it to his wife & doesn't want to say that on nat'l television! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zoechen (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
23. No investgation = Fried n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
26. i think weiner's response is completely rational...fuck their questions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Denzil_DC (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
27. So what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:14 PM Response to Reply #27 |
45. DING, DING, DING!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:36 PM Response to Reply #27 |
65. I think you've got it. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eShirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:42 PM Response to Reply #27 |
70. holy crap! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 09:26 PM Response to Reply #27 |
95. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrMickeysMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 10:11 PM Response to Reply #27 |
104. This is right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Denzil_DC (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 10:53 PM Response to Reply #104 |
109. That's a good approach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrMickeysMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-01-11 11:46 PM Response to Reply #109 |
139. Yes, more of this stuff... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-01-11 01:55 PM Response to Reply #27 |
138. NAILED IT. Clarence Thomas should be impeached. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
29. After watching, I have to agree. He should have either said nothing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
30. BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
31. You sound convinced |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:30 PM Response to Reply #31 |
59. If by extension from the CNN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
32. Then why say it? /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
randr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
33. What is stopping Weiner from calling for an investigation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:07 PM Response to Reply #33 |
42. Exactly! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue37 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 11:21 PM Response to Reply #33 |
111. He did say that he is consulting with lawyers about what civil |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:56 PM Response to Original message |
36. Oh bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
37. I think a lot of DUers will now assume the worst about you. How dare you think for yourself! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:01 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Thanks for your kind response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
44. Hmmmm. At first I believed this to be a standard repuke-playbook smear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
46. Breitbart is a serial liar. Nothing he has said has stood up to the slightest scrutiny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:16 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. OK. Let's discount Breitbart altogether. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:33 PM Response to Reply #48 |
62. My point exactly. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:53 PM Response to Reply #62 |
76. Deleted message |
Nye Bevan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 09:15 PM Response to Reply #76 |
88. If someone hacked me and tweeted a fake photo of me beating my wife |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
49. Deleted message |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
50. I sure hope not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
51. Personally I can't wait until Rep Weiner's friend Jon Stewart kicks breitbart's ass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DFab420 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
53. LOL and once again bbinacan comes through.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:28 PM Response to Reply #53 |
58. I wish I knew who you are. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cid_B (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
54. Weiner is not the best interviewer... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ScreamingMeemie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
56. I am waiting and seeing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:35 PM Response to Reply #56 |
64. Very well said. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftygolfer (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:44 PM Response to Reply #56 |
72. Just stop and think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ScreamingMeemie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:46 PM Response to Reply #72 |
74. I stand with myself. Waiting and seeing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:54 PM Response to Reply #74 |
77. I stand with ScreamingMeemie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftygolfer (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 09:10 PM Response to Reply #74 |
82. oops, my bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Knight Hawk (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
60. After watching the video................. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warrior1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
66. this thread is bull shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:39 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bjorn Against (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
69. I am sure he does not trust the media so why answer their questions? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recovered Repug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:52 PM Response to Reply #69 |
75. "Innocent until proven guilty" is only for a court of law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bjorn Against (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 09:11 PM Response to Reply #75 |
83. Public opinion is not effective at determining guilt or innocence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recovered Repug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 09:59 PM Response to Reply #83 |
97. I agree in the theory, but disagree overall. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
73. I was just about to post the same thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
graywarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
79. One word |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 09:18 PM Response to Reply #79 |
89. I think it's spelled "cock", but yes, that's what's in the picture (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
graywarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 09:23 PM Response to Reply #89 |
92. Cute, but not what I meant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whathehell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
80. Do you think maybe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shagbark Hickory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
81. He did it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bjorn Against (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 09:13 PM Response to Reply #81 |
87. Who needs trials, let's convict people based on how they look on a bad day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shagbark Hickory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-01-11 07:44 AM Response to Reply #87 |
133. He's covicting himself the same way Rethug policians dance around questions about their scandals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
84. His non-denial did not look good. Now he says he doesn't want to talk about it anymore. WTF? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bjorn Against (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 09:22 PM Response to Reply #84 |
90. Would you want to talk about sexual rumors about you to the media? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue37 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 11:26 PM Response to Reply #90 |
112. Remember what Lyndon Johnson said. He wanted to spread stories that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 11:53 PM Response to Reply #90 |
115. Nobody would want that, but as a politician, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-01-11 09:57 AM Response to Reply #115 |
135. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
85. I will believe nothing from Breitbart unless it is triple vetted. Nor should anyone here believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Malikshah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
86. Hmmm. So often the posts that begin with "I hate to say this" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 09:22 PM Response to Original message |
91. Ahhhhhhhhhhhh, you're so concerned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
93. I crack up when people "hate to say" something. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
94. Yeah, why won't Weiner produce that birth certificate? Huh? What's with that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
florida08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 09:33 PM Response to Original message |
96. from huffpo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indykatie (416 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 10:04 PM Response to Reply #96 |
100. Wiener's Actions Only Raise More Flags |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 10:47 PM Response to Reply #100 |
108. .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warrior1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-01-11 08:53 AM Response to Reply #108 |
134. right on CatWoman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor Hurt (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 11:50 PM Response to Reply #100 |
114. who cares if he's "innocent" or not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BulletproofLandshark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-01-11 04:29 AM Response to Reply #100 |
130. Riiiiiiiight n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zoeisright (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 10:01 PM Response to Original message |
99. Quit spewing right wing talking points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 10:07 PM Response to Reply #99 |
103. Not alertable, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drmeow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
106. it depends on his district |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
107. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-11 11:58 PM Response to Original message |
116. Deleted message |
tblue37 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-01-11 12:07 AM Response to Reply #116 |
117. Great post! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-01-11 04:25 AM Response to Reply #116 |
129. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Little Star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-01-11 05:06 AM Response to Original message |
131. I think Weiner just may be innocent because.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-01-11 05:54 AM Response to Original message |
132. It sounds like an obvious hit job to me. And I'm not an enormous fan of Weiner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-01-11 10:31 AM Response to Original message |
136. I imagine many people will personally... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC