Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Twitter Informs Users Of DOJ WikiLeaks Court Order, Didn’t Have To

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 03:42 AM
Original message
Twitter Informs Users Of DOJ WikiLeaks Court Order, Didn’t Have To
Tech Crunch

Alexia Tsotsis


The US Department of Justice has served Twitter with a 2703(d) court order to reveal information about accounts related to people associated with WikiLeaks. The order is a request for account data including the ominous “correspondence and notes of record related to the account” for users Jacob Appelbaum (@ioerror), Rop Gongrijp (@rop_g), Birgitta Jonsittir (@birgittaj); Julian Assange, Bradley Manning, Rop Gongrijp, from November 1, 2009 to present.

Salon is reporting that the original (sealed) order was signed on December 14th and gave Twitter 3 days to comply with the DOJ, without notifying anyone. Then mysteriously the magistrate judge who signed the order decided this Wednesday to unseal the document at Twitter’s request, presumably so it could inform users and give them 10 days to take legal action. User @rop_g received this email.

Kessel, Jan-07 11:20 am (PST):
Dear Twitter User:

We are writing to inform you that Twitter has received legal process requesting information regarding your Twitter account, @rop_g. A copy of the legal process is attached. The legal process requires Twitter to produce documents related to your account.


Please be advised that Twitter will respond to this request in 10 days from the date of this notice unless we receive notice from you that a motion to quash the legal process has been filed or that this matter has been otherwise resolved.

To respond to this notice, please e-mail us at <removed>.

This notice is not legal advice. You may wish to consult legal counsel about this matter. If you need assistance seeking counsel, you may consider contacting the Electronic Frontier Foundation <contact info removed> or the ACLU <contact info removed>.

Sincerely,

Twitter Legal

According to the documents, if Twitter legal had not taken action to unseal the order, it would have had to turn over user information without giving a heads up to users, or anyone really, that it was doing such. When asked why it made the decision to challenge the court order and inform the targets, Twitter representative Sean Garrett gave us the following statement on Twitter’s behalf.



http://techcrunch.com/2011/01/07/twitter-informs-users-of-doj-wikileaks-court-order-didnt-have-to/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&utm_content=Google+Feedfetcher#
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC