Rachel is tearing ReTHUGS a new one on the debt ceiling

[malaise]

complete with a chart of their votes when they were in charge.

[bigwillq]

1. Watching

She is.

K and R

[RandomThoughts]

2. Rachel is a interesting topic, and a typical ploy.

The question is posed, should someone that does some good, but much wrong to you, be allowed to continue.

The typical question is should someone that supports an idea, but does not use that idea to correct the beer and travel money be destroyed.

And that is a computation of importance of balance, but also the paradox of the delusion of seeing an effect when the beer and travel money has not arrived.

Therefore, the non arrival of the beer and travel money takes precedence, since for an other effect to occur, the easier effect should also occur, and if that simpler easier correction does not occur, then the bigger correction will be on a bad foundation and will eventually crumble.

Or a house can not be built by stolen foundation. And knowing that, it is also known that it will crumble, and should be a pawn, with that known future effect. Although with sadness, since it could be the fault of filters, and in that case, that is where the blame falls.

So I make the computed choice not to support her, but know that she does support some ideas that I support, while she also going against what should be corrected.

and delay any actual reciprocity for reasons of "if they are not against you they are for you", if that be the case. And that also explains why some have now, and not later, and it still fits into justice. That is the effect of people that are used, for using other people.

It is a fascinating discussion on effects and rules applied back, and how some can 'have' and yet be known to 'not have' at some future point.

:thumbsup: on some of the advocacy.
:thumbsdown: with temporal dislocation, on the process,

[malaise]

3. Bro you are very deep

I think I'll send your beer. :evilgrin:

[Webster Green]

5. Rachel Maddow owes you beer and travel money?

Are you experienced? :yoiks:

[no limit]

4. I watched this and liked it a lot. But I think it would have been much better...

if she also included where the democrats stood on those same issues at the time. Like the individual mendate.