Sarah Palin and Sharon Angle are Terrorists

[demwing]

for targeting Gifford, and suggesting armed revenge when Teabaggers lose to Democrats.

Now their poisoned seeds have brought forth a strange fruit. This tree has to fall...

Lock them both up in Gitmo, no civilian trial.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4ZyuULy9zs

[eleny]

1. Yes,the 2nd Amendment "solution"

[kelly1mm]

2. Do you have a link to the ID and motivation of the shooter? nt

[kestrel91316]

3. You get one guess. And no, it's not a liberal.

[kelly1mm]

4. I would rather not guess when it comes to highly charged and emotional

events as it can lead to rash decisions such as lynch mobs in the past. I think I will wait for more facts.

[demwing]

5. I dont want them lynched

I want them tossed in a Gitmo cell till the military determines whether or not they pose any additional threat to Americans

[kelly1mm]

6. Really? So assume for sake of argument that this was a La Raza

member upset about Giffords suport for border control. Should we round up all La Raza members or people of mexican descent and send them to Gitmo till the military determines whether or not they pose any additional threat to Americans? Or what if it was a muslim? Round them up and off to Gitmo?

Maybe we should just wait for the facts?

[datasuspect]

7. the National Council of La Raza isn't a terrorist group like the TEA Party is though

having trouble figuring why you'd throw that in there . . .

why would you conflate a mainstream advocacy group like NCLR with a politically motivated assassination in the first place?

where are you coming from?

[kelly1mm]

9. I though you said that the tea party should be named a terrorist organization

because one of their members committed this act (lets assume that for argument's sake at this point since we have no facts right now) Thus, wouldn't it be logical to say that the National Council of La Raza should be named as a terrorist organization if one of it's members committed this act? I don't think so but I am just trying to understand your argument as to why the tea party should be sent to Gitmo.

[datasuspect]

13. it's not just because of one TEA Party member . . .

it's because of the actions and words of MANY TEA Party members.

so no, anything you have to say about it probably is as far from logic as istanbul is from compton.

maybe even farther.

you still didn't answer my question though.

what do you have against a mainstream advocacy group like the National Council of La Raza?

what specifically made you mention that?

[kelly1mm]

14. I do not have anything against NCLR - just used them as an example

in my hypothetical. OK, lets change the hypothetical then. Assume that the shooter was a muslim. Should we round up all muslims since there have been multiple violent acts by muslims and send them to Gitmo till the military says the threat to americans has been neutralized?

[datasuspect]

15. that's what they did after 9-11

what makes you think the M.O. would change?

[kelly1mm]

16. I am asking if you would approve of that as you would for the tea party

types?

[demwing]

8. Kelly, I undserstand your point

and you're right about facts. Let's wait.

But assume for a moment that this shooter had NO connection to Angle or Palin...I'd still liket to see both of those clowns in a cell for attempting to incite terrorism.

[kelly1mm]

11. OK - that is a reasonable argument. Goes against many SC precidents

(see Brandenburg v. Ohio primarily) but a reasonable argument.

[Odin2005]

10. They are traitors.

[earth mom]

12. FUCK those disgusting vile witches!

:grr: