LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:36 PM
Original message |
Have your shit-fit tonight, but we're all going to vote for Obama again in 2012. |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-06-11 10:38 PM by LLStarks
I know it. You know it.
Unless a billionaire like Bloomberg or popular governor like Cuomo enters the race as an independent or primary challenger, people who could win states without torpedoing an election; there's no reason to vote 3rd party.
And even then, do you really want to risk crazy people like Palin or Bachmann in the WH? How about a smarmy and almost as crazy Romney? Even staying home and being selfishly apathetic on election day will be enough to make it happen.
If you want to throw Obama under the bus, be ready to reap what you sow.
I know people across the country will up in arms over the next few days about even the talk of entitlement cuts. And that's fine. We should be angry.
Neither Obama or Congress are going to change their mind to please you at the expense of our financial solvency and future. Regardless of whether our desires are politically expedient or the right thing to do, we don't have a say anymore. The ideal deal you want isn't going to happen because, as I've said repeatedly tonight, it's congressionally impossible.
Because we don't have a voice, we need our own more energetic yet rational answer to the Tea Party for 2012.
But for now, let's be pragmatic and play the politics of the possible.
|
Poll_Blind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:39 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Team Obama 2008: All Carrot. 2012: ALL STICK. |
Luminous Animal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:40 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Save your breath. They feel strongly about their PRINCIPLES, |
|
and after all, it's all about them, right? :eyes: Fuck the rest of us.
This is one issue that really pisses me off, and I shouldn't have even bothered to comment except to rec (although of course it had already ben unnreced).
|
Vincardog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:40 PM
Response to Original message |
3. How is that working for you? Vote BO or the GOP will gut SSI? PLEASE |
defendandprotect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. Good thing we voted for Obama cause GOP might have stopped COLA's ... ???? |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-06-11 10:47 PM by defendandprotect
There is no arguing that if you believe in the NEW DEAL or any
tradiitonal democratic ideals/principles you should recognize
that Obama is on the other side -- the corporate/elite side!
|
concerned22
(6 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:53 PM
Original message |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-06-11 11:54 PM by concerned22
|
StarsInHerHair
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
170. well I unrec FDR YES! Obama? Hell no! |
Bluenorthwest
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:42 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I owe that man nothing and this Party less after all he and it have done. So expect nothing.
|
defendandprotect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:43 PM
Response to Original message |
5. If you vote for Obama you will move party and Congress even further to right ... |
|
Think you're much mistaken about votes for Obama --
We need to find democratic candidates who are uncontaminated by Koch Bros. funded
DLC and democrats who haven't been infested by the DLC over 20 years of its being
harbored within the party.
Tons of democrats who can run on a Democratic ticket -- from Sen. Bernie Sanders to
Tom Hayden -- we need two strong anti-war candiates --
Fascism is the opposite of -- and doesn't respond to -- any practical point of view.
|
LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. If you think Obama being called a socialist is bad, wait until Bernie embraces the term. |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-06-11 10:46 PM by LLStarks
And gives the GOP all the fodder they need for a landslide.
He's a great guy, but not for the national stage.
|
defendandprotect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
17. Worry about what Obama is actually doing -- not what rw is calling him - !! |
|
If you support the New Deal and traditional democratic principles and
ideals then you will find it impossible to support Obama --
Just on the basis of war alone -- my conscience wouldn't permit it.
And happy to say it!
|
Blue-Jay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
27. Then don't fuckin' vote for him. |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-06-11 10:58 PM by Blue-Jay
We get it.
You don't
need to make yourself
into some weird leftier-than-thou
super hero / martyr
with every oddly-spaced
post.
Just don't do it.
Come
out
and
say
it.
OK?
EDIT:
added the word
"for".
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
Poll_Blind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
25. Oh please, Hillary Clinton and her "He's not a muslim...AS FAR AS I KNOW." |
|
Again, you're ALL STICK. People voted for Obama in droves in 2008 because he gave them hope. I sure hope you aren't in charge of drumming up the votes. Your concept of swaying people for Obama is about as good an idea as holding an autopsy at a buffet.
PB
|
Bonobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
35. I remember her calling him a "Slum lord" too. nt |
Aerows
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
|
This stick bit and your last sentence is the best analogy I've heard. They aren't going to gain votes for Obama by bashing us, they need to get on Obama's ass and tell him to start voting and acting like the Democrat he campaigned as. Bitching at people because they are mad when he's trying gut social security is not productive.
What the hell do any of these people, Obama included, think the reaction was going to be when he announces he's willing to cut SS? Candy and flowers?
|
Dept of Beer
(957 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
52. Same thing was said about Obama. |
Dept of Beer
(957 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
The DLC doesn't exist any longer.
If you have a bag of dookie and change the bag the next day you still have a bag of dookie.
But the DLC doesn't exist any longer.
|
defendandprotect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #51 |
70. DLC does still exist and goes all the way to third way, PPI and PNAC .... |
|
Catch up with their new website --
Where they tell us all about the "New Dems" and how this is all interconnected!!
Yeah -- Koch Bros and DLC is a huge bag of "dookie" --
|
oxymoron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:46 PM
Response to Original message |
|
He and any Dem that agrees to these cuts will absolutely not get my vote. I vote for Democrats. Not Republican Lites.
|
LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
12. Then I challenge you and everyone else on DU to give me a better budget/debt deal that WILL pass. nt |
defendandprotect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
20. Obama has set up the Repugs -- resurrected them from the ashes .... |
|
created this position he is now in -- rather than using his mandate to
knock out corporate/fascism he's used his power to further it -- while
claiming the GOP is making him do it!
End $120 billion in tax cuts for rich --
Raise the ceiling on Social Security FICA payments by the wealthy --
End the wars --
Cut the MIC --
Stop the trade agreements --
Renew Glass Steagall --
Create new stimulus and put taxpaying Americans back to work --
|
LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
69. Even if it costs us in 2016, I'm holding out hope for a hyper-progressive second Obama term. nt |
defendandprotect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #69 |
71. And I'm holding my sides laughing ... !! Sad, very sad, to say !! |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-06-11 11:43 PM by defendandprotect
|
concerned22
(6 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #69 |
80. Progressive for Wall Street Vampires, you mean.... |
|
Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Bank of America and Citigroup are fatter than ever thanks to 0bama, Geithner and Bernanke. That's about the most poorly kept secret in the world today - Keynesianism is all about pumping money into Wall Street's Oligopolistic coffers while the rest of America is tightening its belt.
|
Marr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #69 |
107. Well, keep on Hope©ing. |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-07-11 12:26 AM by Marr
|
Obamanaut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #69 |
158. "Hope and Change" turned out to be code for "Same old, Same old." Enough already! nt |
newspeak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #69 |
183. yeah, and how's that extension of Little Boot's tax cuts for the wealthy |
|
working? Oh, it's only temporary until the corrupt, greedy repugs can make it permanent. Rescinding those tax cuts, cutting some military spending, especially to over paid vulture contractors, while creating more government infrastructure jobs to get people working and money flowing. the repugs want to cut drastically which will create even more job loss, just to keep themselves and their rich friends from paying.
And I'd really love to see the big boys on Wall Street pay, because they deserve to pay-some have caused this economic destruction, not just us, but countries all over the world, just so they could make a killing.
I'd say Obama and Hillary are two peas in a pod. Why bash Hillary? The Clintons seem to have the same ideology as Obama. Go DLC, oh I mean Third way.
|
Aerows
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
169. Cut defense spending |
|
and stick to their damn guns. The Republicans want to raise the debt ceiling - we all know this. If Obama caves to their demands, they know he will be throwing the Democratic party under the bus, and they know the result.
And YOU if you are such a strong supporter of Obama need to be writing to him and telling him not to shoot himself in the foot, along with your other representatives and senators.
|
Dept of Beer
(957 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
54. Say that here during the election season and... |
TheKentuckian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
168. Lite??? That would be full on, just not a neo-Bircher. |
Better Believe It
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:48 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Why in the world would you even consider voting for Bloomberg or Cuomo if they ran? |
|
Just what this country needs, a different tool for Wall Street in the White House!
|
Blue-Jay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:48 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The shit fit never ends. It's a 24/7 sport.
|
ZombieHorde
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:51 PM
Original message |
I think of it as more of a hobby than a sport. nt |
FreakinDJ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:49 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Hilary is looking pretty good right now |
Skip Intro
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
defendandprotect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
30. Whaaaat ? Hillary is part of Koch Bros. funded DLC leadership ... ???? |
gkhouston
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
53. It's not clear to me that things would be significantly different. n/t |
gkhouston
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:49 PM
Response to Original message |
14. The politics of the possible? |
|
It's possible that people who are out of work and have had their Social Security and Medicare traded away aren't going to see any reason to believe they will be better off voting for any Democrat, much less Obama.
|
LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. I take it you'd prefer the Ryan Plan? nt |
Mojorabbit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
19. I would prefer a Prez who uses his bully pulpit |
|
to rally the country saying he has the people's back. Poll after poll shows that they do not want SS touched. I bet enough republicans would face revolt in their districts and fold. This is giving it away without a fight.
|
tnlefty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
28. I'd prefer that the President tell Ryan and his plan and the |
|
repukes in general to stick it where the sun doesn't shine, but that's a personal fantasy of mine. I would never, ever expect him to do it.
|
concerned22
(6 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #28 |
82. I wish 0bama would personally kick Ryan's Regressive ass, myself..nt. |
tnlefty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #82 |
164. Welcome concerned22! |
defendandprotect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
34. We would prefer the NEW DEAL and democratic principles plan, FDR .... |
|
and not a Koch Bros. funded DLC which has infested the party for 20 years --
polluting its candidates and its agenda -- turning the party upside down for
corporate/fascism.
|
gkhouston
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
39. False choice, but thanks for playing. n/t |
woo me with science
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
64. There will always be a new Ryan plan. That's the brilliance of it. |
|
The new leadership is by excuse.
They're already printing up the new "New Democrat" bumper stickers:
"Vote for us. We're hostages." "Vote for us. We're marginally better than death squads." "Vote for us. We're dismantling the social safety net somewhat more slowly than the other guy." "Vote for us. We have no purity tests. And no principles."
|
Marr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
105. The sad fact is things like the Ryan plan have a better chance under a DLC-sort of administration |
|
than even a Republican one. Obama has proven adept at pushing that right-wing policy under the guise of "compromise". That sort of policy would be more of a political football without a disguised Republican the White House.
|
Change has come
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:51 PM
Response to Original message |
16. How many elections will you "third way" types win? |
|
You're either part of a coalition or you're not.
|
LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
32. If Perot won in '92 and didn't have his platform absorbed, Third Wayers might have a leg to stand on |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-06-11 11:00 PM by LLStarks
Coming in 2nd in two states doesn't cut it.
|
LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:53 PM
Response to Original message |
18. If you guys want change, primary your congressman. Stop trying to work with the 112th Congress. nt |
Blasphemer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:55 PM
Response to Original message |
21. I'm quite sure that many won't |
|
The DU rules may prevent those who do not from saying so. I don't think those non-voters will impact the results in 2012 because the GOP has a pathetic line up of candidates. I am very concerned that Obama's decisions as POTUS will undermine the party's chances in 2016. It could well be a repeat of 2000, except with the addition of the Tea Party element.
|
Eddie Haskell
(817 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
31. I have friends who wouldn't think of voting Replublican ... |
|
they're now saying they won't vote in 2012.
|
Skip Intro
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:55 PM
Response to Original message |
Drale
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:56 PM
Response to Original message |
23. What are all this toddlers going to say when nothing |
|
of the short that is being reported happens? Are they going to apologize for the personal attacks that have been going on for the last hour or so?
|
Mojorabbit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
29. The NYT speaks of secret meetings |
Drale
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
33. I'm sure they are secret meetings but they are secret |
|
and I'm sure the NYT or WP or any other paper has no idea whats going on at those meetings they are just printing bullshit at this point to cause controversy.
|
defendandprotect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
50. Secrecy isn't democracy -- -- and we've had too many back room deals from Obama already -- !! |
tkmorris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
72. Da fuck you callin a toddler? |
|
Have you read the rules around here lately?
|
rug
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 10:57 PM
Response to Original message |
26. In other words, shut up and vote. |
LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
36. In a sense, yes. But this is more of a "don't shit yourself" request. nt |
defendandprotect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
38. It's more like "Drill now, think later" -- "Vote now, don't think" --- however .... |
|
the more you vote for the lesser evil the more you move the party
and Congress to the right --
while the nation is on the left and being betrayed --
80% of the public want an end to the wars --
73% of Americans want MEDICARE FOR ALL --
that includes 83% of Catholics who also want reproductive health care/abortion included
|
Dept of Beer
(957 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
LiberalAndProud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:03 PM
Response to Original message |
37. For the first time, I am doubtful of Obama reelection. |
|
If these reports are true, the vote will be suppressed. Democrats will not turn out. If this is the outcome of so much work and unprecedented activism to get a Democrat elected, I fail to see the point of trying.
This is fundamental betrayal. They don't call it the third rail for nothing. And it's a Democrat who will be held responsible. Thanks for nothing.
|
defendandprotect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #37 |
41. Notice as bad as this is, there is no Democrat coming forward which indicates |
|
we've had complete infestation of the Democratic Party by the Koch Bros
funded DLC --
Where are the Democrats who are supporting Social Security and Medicare -- ?
A handfull in the progressive caucus?
The party has totally been polluted by right wing money --
If you continue to vote for the lesser evil you will move the party and the
Congress even further to the right --
we have corporate/fascism controlling our government/Congress now -- how much
further to the right do you want to go?
|
Dept of Beer
(957 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #37 |
57. If a politician does this to the third rail then I wouldn't |
LiberalAndProud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #57 |
61. Clearly, they've already agreed to an adjusted CPI. |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-06-11 11:28 PM by LiberalAndProud
So, benefits will be cut no regardless of what other concessions he makes. And even if rumors of further concessions are just a trial balloon, it makes me sick to my stomach.
I am very serious that this makes me question my party affiliation, and that breaks my heart. I must question if I want to be a Democrat any longer.
|
Dept of Beer
(957 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #61 |
79. Never question the quality of your convictions are when they are just and fair. |
|
One should rather question the actions of those who they have bestowed their trust in.
No apologies.
I'm a (D)emocrat. I know what Democrats are supposed to fight for. I also know what republicans and hacks are capable of.
|
LiberalAndProud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #79 |
81. When my party fails to reflect the quality of my convictions, how is it my party? |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-07-11 12:00 AM by LiberalAndProud
If the general trajectory of policy is the same regardless of party, it may be time to join the majority of the populace and just stay home. Does that favor Republicans? Yes it does. Does it matter? I'm not sure that it does any more.
I have wanted to not arrive at this place, yet here I am.
|
Dept of Beer
(957 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #81 |
83. I understand what you are getting at. |
|
No apologies. Believe what you believe. Perhaps there are more than just a few here in this big tent that agree with your sentiment.
|
gkhouston
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #37 |
75. For the first time, I am indifferent about an Obama re-election. n/t |
Mimosa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #75 |
87. Me, too. I refuse to be scared. |
|
I lived under Nixon, Reagan. Bush 41 and Bush 43. Clinton and Obama merely seem part of the warring job-offshoring continuity. I wish it weren't so. I worked to get Obama elected. I gave Obama my pitiful money. But he's listening to those with differing agendas.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:06 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #40 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:09 PM
Response to Original message |
43. The battlefield for a progressive congress is 2012. The White House will have to wait until 2016. |
|
Suck it up guys.
We can do it, it'll just take time.
|
defendandprotect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #43 |
48. We don't have time to vote for any more lesser evils which move party further to the right ... |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-06-11 11:39 PM by defendandprotect
Nor does the environment have the time -- nor the planet --
nor our military -- nor Iraq, Afghanistan and all of the ME --
How many more dead and destroyed by 2016?
How many just since 2008 -- !!! and 2006 -- !! When Pelosi confirmed that
"Dems were elected to end the war!" -- :nuke:
Don't think that most of what's left of Obama supporters here understand
Obama is out of time -- it's over.
|
LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #48 |
49. Being elected to change Washington means nothing if the numbers on the Hill are stacked against you. |
defendandprotect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #49 |
63. When Dems had presidency, Senate, House they lost -- when GOP has House, they win? |
|
:rofl:
Amazing what some will believe!!
Obama has ... what they say ... "snatched defeat from the jaws of victory" --
conveniently for him as he picked a team on Day #1 which was directed to a win
for corporations -- not the public.
But good thing we didn't vote for GOP last time cause they might have been knocking
out Social Security and Medicare!!!
:rofl:
|
Erose999
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #43 |
141. How will and (D) candidate win on Obama's record of failures and capitulations? The GOP didn't do |
|
so well campaigning on GWB's record in 2008. Obama will likewise poison the well for Dems in 2012.
If you think Bachmann and Santorum are scary now, just wait.
|
RandomKoolzip
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:10 PM
Response to Original message |
44. At this point the only difference between the parties on a national level is merely a |
|
question of style. Would you rather have some gauche hick, drooling-stoned on god and/or Rand, fucking you in the ass or would you rather it be a cool guy who dresses sharp (and uses some lube) (and tells you he hates doing it but still does it)?
|
LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #44 |
47. Nice analogy, too bad your post is nightmare fuel. nt |
Dept of Beer
(957 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #47 |
109. Will it be a nightmare that we are able to wake up from? |
izquierdista
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:11 PM
Response to Original message |
|
If the two possibilities are gradual suffocation and complete loss of oxygen, maybe having the Repubs snuff out the United States will be the better course. At least that way, people get around to picking up the pieces and trying to rebuild sooner.
|
kath
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #46 |
174. That's pretty much where I am at this point. |
|
Get it over with, so people can wake up and start rebuilding.
|
Tierra_y_Libertad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:18 PM
Response to Original message |
55. Speak for yourself. My vote is still my vote to use as I please. |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-06-11 11:19 PM by Tierra_y_Libertad
"Were parties here divided merely by a greediness for office,...to take a part with either would be unworthy of a reasonable or moral man." Thomas Jefferson
|
Dept of Beer
(957 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #55 |
|
I've been looking for a Harry S. Truman quote on Dems and republicans.
|
H2O Man
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:22 PM
Response to Original message |
58. Delusional thinking there. |
|
It would be foolish to believe that. The President and his team need to recognize that a large portion of the people who voted for him in '08 are very unlikely to do so again. He needs to earn their votes.
Some will vote third party in protest; others will vote third party in an earnest attempt to break the current stranglehold on national politics; and others will not vote for anyone.
This is significant. No matter what polls say now about overall percentages of popularity, presidential elections depend upon state counts. And President Obama is not in any position where he can afford to take a number of states he carried in '08 for granted.
|
Dept of Beer
(957 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:26 PM
Response to Original message |
60. Are these the official marching orders? |
|
Do I get a kick in the ass for voting or a kick to the groin?
So many options.
|
juajen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:27 PM
Response to Original message |
62. BS. I will vote for whomever I please. I don't buy into a dem at any cost crapola. |
KelleyKramer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:34 PM
Response to Original message |
65. so it went from 'change we can believe in' to the 'politics of the possible' ???? |
|
That's what it has come to? .. seriously??!?
Oh my, the last 2 1/2 years of action sure have changed the selling message...
You HAVE to vote for me because I don't suck as much as the most batshit insane candidates to ever enter US politics.
After a landslide election win, and the bonus of super majorities in both houses of congress..
And now that is all you have? That is your best sell?? .. seriously?
|
LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #65 |
68. Can I offer you a shit sandwich or a giant douche? Also, welcome to politics. nt |
defendandprotect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #68 |
73. This is the shadow of corporatism cast over government -- elite $$$$ -- |
|
polluting and corrupting the government and political arena --
|
LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #73 |
76. And the rest of the world laughs at us because of it. |
defendandprotect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #76 |
133. No -- and, in fact, much of the world is being attacked as we are by corporates/elites ... |
|
Look at Europe and how their safety nets are being destroyed --
Look at what the trade agreements are doing to us -- and to Mexico --
Wherever you look there is destruction by the rightwing as fascism grows.
Very few people will laugh at the suffering of our ill and suffering --
and you have only to read the suffering of many here at DU to understand that.
Did we laugh at those harmed during Katrina? And do we begin to understand now
that we all have the real possibility of being "Katrina'd" ... ?
|
myrna minx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #68 |
74. More delightful GOTV efforts for President Obama. |
|
:applause: Fuck you! Screw you! or Fuck off! You decide.
|
KelleyKramer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #68 |
77. Defeatist and pathetic! |
|
This reminds me of people who get hit over the head with a club and say..
Thank you Sir, may I have another!
I don't care to get my head smashed in.
Sell your pathetic story, you can sell it walking.
|
MiaCulpa
(741 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:37 PM
Response to Original message |
66. Clap louder and enjoy the catfood. |
|
Because if you don't vote Democratic, the Republicans will win and do all the things Democrats are helping Obama do.
|
Mimosa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #66 |
84. LOL sad but true (the art of the impossible) |
|
OP Title should be "What's he Done NOW?"
|
woo me with science
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #66 |
103. Exactly how the chained CPI will work... |
Erose999
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #66 |
146. Well at least the USDA requires that all pet food be fit for human consumption. |
|
I hope nobody tells that to the Republicans though, as they will then seek to deregulate the pet food industry.
|
myrna minx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:37 PM
Response to Original message |
67. Desperate smugness is rather unbecoming. |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-06-11 11:39 PM by myrna minx
Stop the press - another STFU post making the President of the United States of America a victim and unaccountable. I'll be over here with the teachers, the elderly, the unions, the poor, women and the LGBTIQ who are all clutching our ponies. So is "shit fit" the new pony?
On edit - I'll vote for whomever I choose, thank you: Not the dictates of party entitlement. Talk about entitlements. :eyes:
|
hulka38
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-06-11 11:53 PM
Response to Original message |
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:05 AM
Response to Original message |
85. From 'hope and change' to 'stop your shit-fit'. Inspirational! nt |
myrna minx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #85 |
88. In the olden days we had ponies that puked glitter. |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-07-11 12:10 AM by myrna minx
Who knew they had e.coli too.
|
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #88 |
Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:07 AM
Response to Original message |
86. If he offers up SS to the republicans as an appetizer before the Medicare main course |
|
I can pretty much assure you that neither I nor ANY Democrat that I know in REAL life will pull that lever for him.
I REFUSE to vote for a republican...even IF he is pretending to be a Democrat.
|
LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #86 |
89. I won't pull the lever either because we just got rid of them. |
|
Seriously though, I can't imagine him offering up anything that's destructive.
The tone on DU is that even shaving a penny from SS or Medicare is the end of the world.
|
Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #89 |
93. Well when every fucking cent that is shaved off of us becomes a tax cut for the rich |
|
it IS the end of the world.
We need REAL HOPE and REAL CHANGE...not just some touchy feely speeches while everything we hold near and dear is bargained away. We NEED a REAL leader...not an empty suit.
|
LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #93 |
97. I'd rather be miserable with Obama than suicidal with a Gooper. Nobody can primary Obama and win. nt |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-07-11 12:17 AM by LLStarks
|
Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #97 |
98. Well hate to break it to ya...obama IS a Gooper. |
|
A REAL Democrat wouldn't do what he has done.
|
LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #98 |
101. A real democrat doesn't make it to the national stage and survive. Sad truth. nt |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-07-11 12:19 AM by LLStarks
|
Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #101 |
104. Bullshit. Americans THOUGHT they elected a real Democrat and gave that REAL Democrat a mandate |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-07-11 12:24 AM by Horse with no Name
obama took that mandate and squandered it away begging the republicans to like him.
For ALL that he has given away unnecessarily--he HAS NOT got ONE thing in return. Not a single vote. Not a single concession and the moron still hasn't figured it out.
|
LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #104 |
108. Standing next to Gravel and Kucinich, I never expected Obama to be a REAL Democrat. nt |
Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #108 |
111. Yeah..unfortunately the resemblance he has to Reagan is nauseating. n/t |
LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #111 |
122. Every time I see a real Democrat with WH aspirations, I check for a "Rep." prefix and facepalm. |
|
Our only hope is people like Feingold who don't have the historical stigma of being a member of the lower house.
|
gkhouston
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #101 |
121. Well, there's no point in voting for a fake one. n/t |
Dept of Beer
(957 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #89 |
96. If they go for SS or Medicare it won't be to shave a penny. |
|
The razor used will be for opening our carotid.
|
Dept of Beer
(957 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #86 |
|
And the men who spurred us on Sit in judgment of all wrong They decide and Diebold sings the song
|
dana_b
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #91 |
124. true - how we vote (or don't) |
|
probably will be inconsequential anyway. Diebold 2012!!
|
Dept of Beer
(957 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #124 |
|
We know how you will vote even before you do.
-or-
Let us take the hassle out of voting.
|
dana_b
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #134 |
lumberjack_jeff
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:14 AM
Response to Original message |
92. Going for a world record in unrecs? |
|
If the WaPo article is correct, you aren't.
To paraphrase Myrna Minx, elected officials willing to rob us of that which we're entitled, is not entitled to my vote.
|
gkhouston
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #92 |
118. Thanks for the reminder! Forgot to unrec this swale o' swill. n/t |
saras
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:15 AM
Response to Original message |
94. Luckily I'm in a state that will vote Obama, so I can vote for someone whose values I respect |
|
If I have to vote Obama to keep a wingnut from taking my state, I will.
But otherwise, I'm going to vote the same Democratic values I've always voted, no matter how far the party moves to the right from those values.
But given the absolute pathetic triviality of Republican candidates, why is everyone so worried about whether Obama will win in 2012 or not? Didn't he do enough for people to be preferable to the Tea Party?
|
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:16 AM
Response to Original message |
95. "But for now, let's be pragmatic" - right out of the DLC sellout playbook. |
girl gone mad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:18 AM
Response to Original message |
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:18 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
Dr Fate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:19 AM
Response to Original message |
102. SOOOO with you. The professional left needs to admit this is a Center Right Nation. |
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #102 |
106. DLC is destroying the party. |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-07-11 12:24 AM by Bluebear
|
Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #102 |
110. The "Centrists" need to give up their charade and admit that they are republicans |
|
Demean the REAL Democrats by calling them the "professional left" all you want...but we all know that the republican brand is tarnished and the centrists were cowards (as usual) and wouldn't even fight for their own party. They just infiltrated ours.
|
LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #110 |
113. So, being excessively liberal on social issues yet conciliatory on economic issues is centrist? nt |
Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #113 |
114. Oh please...which "Centrist" are you claiming is excessively liberal? |
|
Please. I know the difference between shit and chocolate pudding...even when someone tries to convince me otherwise.
|
LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #114 |
115. Me. Because the running insinuation in this thread is that I'm cookie-cutter DLC. |
|
I probably deserve it given the nature of the thread, but I'll defend my views to the death.
|
Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #115 |
120. I don't embrace the big tent. Moderates and Centrists with republican values are republicans |
|
You can identify yourself any way you wish...that is your prerogative. Just like it is mine to label a duck a duck--even if they call themselves a goose.
|
Caretha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #115 |
159. And I'll defend my views to the death too |
|
And crap that you post or are paid to post will not influence me one little bit.
|
Dr Fate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #110 |
116. I'm using the phrase the way the Obama admin uses it, not in a demeaning way. |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-07-11 12:38 AM by Dr Fate
Nt
|
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #116 |
123. The way the Obama admin uses it certainly IS in a demeaning way. |
Starry Messenger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #102 |
112. I realize this is satire. |
|
But at a certain point doesn't trying to type that stuff with a straight face kind of back up on you like too many greasy french fries?
|
Change has come
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #102 |
117. Enjoy your future victories! |
gkhouston
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #102 |
119. all polling to the contrary.... n/t |
Ignis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #102 |
136. Which DUers are the "professional left?" |
Dr Fate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #136 |
137. The ones who would rather attack Obama than go after Palin, Bachman and the Koch Brothers. |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-07-11 02:38 AM by Dr Fate
The ones who are fooled by the media into using rw tactics to attack themselves, etc. More: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=433x700427
|
Stinky The Clown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:46 AM
Response to Original message |
125. Unrec for overly sticky flypaper. |
Speck Tater
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:54 AM
Response to Original message |
126. Obama was the last Republican I will ever vote for. nt |
LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #126 |
127. What kind of Republican would end DADT, ignore DOMA, and use smart tactics to kill OBL? nt |
Erose999
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #127 |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-07-11 07:43 AM by Erose999
DADT lasted longer than it needed to and it may still return on appeal.
DOMA need to be taken off the books. Simply not enforcing it is not enough. If it remains on the books a future administration can start enforcing it again.
and about killing OBL... he really should have been captured alive and formally charged and tried for his crimes. I'm not cool with extrajudicial assassination at the President's order. That sets a fucking dangerous precedent.
|
meow mix
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 01:04 AM
Response to Original message |
128. i yearn for the days when less people were rounded up at the point of a submachine gun. |
provis99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 01:16 AM
Response to Original message |
129. now I remember why I put you on Ignore the first time. |
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 01:18 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
dana_b
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 01:26 AM
Response to Original message |
131. I know nothing of the sort |
kenny blankenship
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 01:29 AM
Response to Original message |
Raine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 02:26 AM
Response to Original message |
138. Don't presume to tell me what I will do with my vote |
|
because you are dead wrong. Yeah I have no where else to go, that's why I will sit it out. I will NEVER again vote for a Democrat that is nothing but a Republican in disquise. If it makes you feel better though go ahead and be unrealistic and believe whatever you want.
|
Eddie Haskell
(817 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #138 |
151. I'll second that, we have no representation. |
|
Our votes don't count ... We can't fix a system that's rigged. Working within the system only makes it stronger.
|
HillWilliam
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 02:27 AM
Response to Original message |
|
We were sold change from *. What we've gotten is being sold down the road a piece at a time. This is a continuing pattern from the DLC (or whoever the fuck they're calling themselves these days) since 2006: sell a bunch of "hope" and "change" then immediately turn their backs on us after they've gotten time we had to make and money we didn't have to spare.
"Politics of the possible" my fruit-flavored ass. That's just a buzzphrase for "we'll take your time, effort, and money then forget you ever existed when we get what we want". What we were sold (and we foolishly bought) was a break from Republican and RepubliLite "democrats" who screw their constituents for profit. What we got was MOTS - more of the same -- every election since 2006... the evil-lite, slightly less evil than the other guy, the silly one calorie of evil, not quite evil enough to be a repig.
Fuck that. I'm a (D)emocrat and only a balls-to-the-wall Democrat will get my vote. Not some suit who makes pretty speeches then sells your house out from around you down to the shoes off your feet simply by conceding them to the repigs as the first things on the table -- not the last.
Primary his ass. And if he recovers from that, yay. But he still isn't getting any votes from this household.
When I see a Democrat worthy of my time, effort, and money then that one will get time, effort, money, AND my vote.
So far, I don't see it happening.
|
TheCowsCameHome
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 06:52 AM
Response to Original message |
jeanmarc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 07:26 AM
Response to Original message |
142. no, I'm not. I really don't care to vote for Obama if he makes this deal |
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 07:26 AM
Response to Original message |
143. I don't know it. I'm not so sure he wants to run again. |
katnapped
(938 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 07:27 AM
Response to Original message |
|
He does this he can kiss my *ss. My vote isn't a "given"
(and shame I can't unrec this a few more times)
|
merbex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 07:31 AM
Response to Original message |
145. Very Very easy for me to leave the presidential box blank after this |
|
VERY EASY and I will feel vindicated doing it too
|
Ganja Ninja
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 07:36 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I will not reward a Democratic president that sells out Social Security.
It would be no different than voting for Mitt Romney.
|
ThomWV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 07:36 AM
Response to Original message |
148. There will be other choices |
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 07:39 AM
Response to Original message |
149. I will not vote for any president that unravels what's left of the New Deal. |
|
So we shall see what the end result will be.
|
undeterred
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 07:41 AM
Response to Original message |
150. Maybe a Democrat will run for president. |
|
That's who I'll cast my vote for.
|
hobbit709
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 07:44 AM
Response to Original message |
153. It will be difficult to push the buttons while holding my nose with one hand |
|
and holding a barf bag in the other
|
alsame
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 07:46 AM
Response to Original message |
154. And here on DU we often ponder how the GOP gets people to |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-07-11 07:46 AM by alsame
vote against their own interests. Seems like the Democrats are now going to use the same playbook.
|
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #154 |
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 07:48 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
Autumn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 07:48 AM
Response to Original message |
156. Don't take that check to the bank. |
|
I'm not a constitutional scholar but I do believe in the Constitution,
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. you will notice it says People, our. Not Wall Street, corporations.
I'll throw him under the bus and I'm ready to reap what I sow. If they won't change their minds to please us, then it's time to change them. That's the the politics of the possible.
Personally I would rather have a rapid fall into hell than a long drawn out slide.
|
Buns_of_Fire
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #156 |
161. We've all peeled off Band-Aids. Many, from our youngsters. |
|
You can scrape away from the edges, give it a little tug to release another fraction of an inch, and either cause more pain to yourself or know that you're causing more pain.
Or just take a firm grip and rip it off once and for all and get it over with.
This "long drawn out slide," is starting to appear more than a little sadistic.
|
Obamanaut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 07:48 AM
Response to Original message |
157. Will you do a 'write-in' when he is not successful in the primaries? nt |
leeroysphitz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 08:23 AM
Response to Original message |
160. I wouldn't fucking count on ut. n/t |
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 08:31 AM
Response to Original message |
162. Most people will probably hold their noses and vote for the traitor but there will still be |
|
many who will sit out the presidential race or decide to vote Green and that, my friend, could mean the defeat of President Obama. Will we like having a GOP president? NO, but Obama has betrayed Democrats one too many times.
|
Kermitt Gribble
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:56 AM
Response to Original message |
|
"Neither Obama or Congress are going to change their mind to please you at the expense of our financial solvency and future."
You're equating Social Security and Medicare to a pony? Those are core issues of the Democratic Party. And, neither has a role in our national debt, so your "Financial solvency and future" statement is bullshit.
I won't vote for a Democrat who doesn't fight for the core issues of the Democratic Party. He has about 16 months to earn my vote.
|
white_wolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 07:47 PM
Response to Original message |
166. If Obama cuts a single sent from SS or Medicare I won't vote for him. |
|
I'm not even sure if I will if he doesn't cut them, but if he does then forget it. I wouldn't vote for him again to save my life if he cuts those.
|
robcon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #166 |
172. You're going to vote for a Repuglican? Or not vote? |
|
Whatever the results, the Repuglicans win.
|
alarimer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 08:26 PM
Response to Original message |
171. Don't tell me what to do. |
|
I will not be voting for Obama, no matter how many people tell me I have to.
He has betrayed liberal and Democrats in general.
|
LooseWilly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 09:08 PM
Response to Original message |
173. Keep telling yourself that. |
|
I particularly like the phrase you used though: "we don't have a say anymore". The funny part is that 'we' do... and that voice is expressed the same way as it is being expressed by the Tea Party that you keep trying to set up as a boogeyman—'our' voice is expressed by NOT voting for candidates that don't represent us.
It's as simple as that. If people aren't being represented, but they vote for that candidate anyway... then they're demonstrating how little anything they ask for/demand needs to be considered by said candidate when "crunch time" comes around.
Carry on with the threats of Tea Party loonies though... it's amusing to read. Rather than "politics of the possible" though, I'd suggest you call it "the politics of submission". You might even be able to convince some voters that it's the "other side" that your politics are meant to make submit. ;)
|
TheKentuckian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 09:17 PM
Response to Original message |
175. I'd speak for myself. This ain't everyone's first cycle or two. |
|
I know we are responsible for what we set loose on the people just as I believe the Republicans are.
We are obligated to replace these frauds and give the people a real choice or we endorse and demand what those that we vote in, do exactly what they do.
We can only do so much about tricksters pulling shenanigans but we own it when we send them back to pull more shit off.
You vote for people that would do that kind of damage and you buy it.
You raise an opposition and replace the betrayers. If the electorate goes the other way then they chose it, I will not endorse or in any way support what is going down.
If they won't change their minds we are obligated to do our best to change it for them.
I won't buy another penny of ownership in this debacle. It is time to do what is right for our elders, ourselves, our children, and those that may come along down the line because it is better to fail in the best effort to do right than to willfully fail by cowardly inaction and stubborn but aimless partisanship.
|
Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #175 |
187. I wish you would make this its own OP |
|
It is lost here in the ra-ra thread.
I have been trying to express how I feel, but this sums it up nicely. Good job.
|
WillyT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 09:18 PM
Response to Original message |
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #176 |
179. in a pathetic sort of way :0 |
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 09:19 PM
Response to Original message |
177. How does this make you feel? |
|
Your tone is triumphant, which it kinda puzzling to me.
|
blkmusclmachine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 09:31 PM
Response to Original message |
178. The Party's forever going right. |
|
Where will it end? At this pace, we'll be nominating Bachmann-lite for POTUS in 20 years, and be told "it's the best we can do." I don't support that, and I don't support the people that tell us it's the best we can do. Time to cleanse our Party of the Fakes & Wannabe's.
|
Marrah_G
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 09:40 PM
Response to Original message |
Le Taz Hot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 09:41 PM
Response to Original message |
181. No, WE don't know any such thing. |
|
You, like the Democratic Party, think we have no choice. How wrong you/they are.
|
unkachuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 09:44 PM
Response to Original message |
182. "...but we're all going to vote for Obama again in 2012." |
|
....sorry, I can't do that. I only vote for Democrats.
|
emsimon33
(904 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 09:57 PM
Response to Original message |
184. count me out in 2012 |
Union Scribe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 10:01 PM
Response to Original message |
185. "We should be angry" Then we should roll over and take it. Lol. |
graywarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 10:04 PM
Response to Original message |
186. There has to be an algebraic equation for rational vs irrational |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:19 AM
Response to Original message |