Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

KABOOOOOOOOOOM! Murdoch's phone hacking scandal crosses the Atlantic

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 02:48 PM
Original message
KABOOOOOOOOOOM! Murdoch's phone hacking scandal crosses the Atlantic
http://www.lavozdelcentro.net/centrist-news/did-wall-street-journal-honcho-cover-up-murdoch-phone-hack-scandal
<snip>
A scandal involving phone-hacking by a right-wing newspaper tabloid owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation is threatening the administration of British Prime Minister David Cameron. Now the scandal is boomeranging back to New York, engulfing the top executive at the largest-circulation newspaper in the United States, the Wall Street Journal.

To clean up some of the mess, Murdoch has called upon the talents of former Bush administration Assistant Attorney General Viet Dinh, whose views on privacy are enshrined in the U.S.A. PATRIOT Act, and Joel Klein, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s union-bashing former schools chief, known for his phony claims of test-score gains.

The Crown Jewel and the Screaming Slime

Every corporate mogul likes to crown his empire with a jewel, and Rupert Murdoch is no exception. Having made a fortune acquiring screaming tabloids and making them scream louder, and acquiring a media company, Fox, now known for its ideological rabble-rousing, Murdoch wanted to buy his News Corp a little respectability. And so, in 2007, he purchased Dow Jones and its Wall Street Journal, the pinstriped, grey-at-the temples, oxford-shod media presence of the global financial sector.

As CEO of the Dow Jones Company, of which WSJ is a part, Murdoch installed Les Hinton, who had previously run News Corp’s British newspaper empire, known as News International. Now it appears that Hinton may have won his prize spot for his part in an apparent coverup of a multi-year phone-hacking operation that likely involved an editor who went on to serve as the prime minister’s spokesperson, and another who would go on to run all of Murdoch’s UK papers.
---------------
Hahahhahahahaha Rubert, Coulson and Cameron!!!
Bushies coming up shortly ! :rofl: :popcorn:

http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2011/07/cameron-coulson-hacking
Why Cameron got it so wrong on Coulson
<snip>
The PM has a blind spot when it comes to accusations against people who are useful to him.

David Cameron's political antennae have badly let him down over phone hacking. It is an important moment for his premiership, although not, perhaps, a Titanic-on-the-iceberg moment, as some commentators have implied.

Naturally, he was cosy with News International. That, sadly, goes with the territory of being PM. So the fact of courting Rupert Murdoch and Rebekah Brooks was not so much a matter of judgment as submission to perceived political necessity. That doesn't make it OK - there will be much cringing in No. 10 over the photos of Cam and Brooks looking chummy. But the fact of a relationship is not, in itself a personal blow to the PM. The NI power game is a cross-party issue in the Westminster. The Labour party (as Mehdi wrote this week) is hardly immune from criticism on that front.

It is the appointment and repeated defences of Andy Coulson that make this whole issue toxic for Cameron. Presumably, when the appointment was first made in 2007 - on the recommendation of George Osborne, let no-one forget - a conversation was had about the existence of skeletons in NoW closets and how they might, in the future, damage the party and its leader. How thorough was that conversation? Was it repeated when the Guardian first started exposing the scale of the hacking, by which time Cameron was PM and Coulson was a senior figure in the government? Whatever happened between them, Cameron must not have interrogated his advisor enough about the culture of hacking and paying the police at the News of the World. Or he did and Coulson lied to him, in which case, shame on Cam for believing him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Look at all of those liberal media liberals!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pennylane100 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. let's hope that names dates and places will soon be forthcoming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ok pass the darn popcorn
I want a front row seat when this mess implodes.

By the way... let me predict the Fox viewer response... LIB'RUL media and COMMIES are holding a persecution... they will bring the Gulags back.

I hope, pretty please, that this goes all the way to Mr. Murdoch himself and that this expands to Australia too... the more the merrier
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Butter?


Keep a seat in the front row for me - the shit is about to hit the fan :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. k&r...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hotler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. k&r n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. I wonder why the New Statesman is assuming that Cameron
didn't know about the hacking, or failed to ask Coulson about it?

Having the Media on your side, especially Murdoch, would be beneficial to some politicians.

Cameron is not stupid. My guess is he did know but didn't care. Maybe Coulson will implicate a few politicians also.

I wonder who is really behind the Murdoch Global Propaganda machine?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. You really wonder
New Statesman????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. The excerpt in your third link is from the New Statesman
blog. In the last paragraph from the excerpt they mention Cameron's seeming ignorance of the scandal and wonder if he made much effort to dig deeper into it. I suppose they can't outright accuse him of something they, so far, have no proof of though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yeh I know
but New Statesman is not exactly liberal so their perceived naivete is no surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Lol, true. It just seemed overly naive even for
those who might be attempting some kind of defense for Cameron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. Might this take down the WSJ?
I can dream, can't I?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. We're all dreaming
I'd love the collapse of everything Murdoch!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. Republicon Family Cesspool Values - media style
Republicon skankitude is vast and stoopendously stanky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
14. I Facebooked this today, and STILL got plenty of News Corps defenders.
The most common retort..."So what, I should start watching MSNBC? Now that's fair and balanced!"

Yes, I responded. MSNBC is, in fact, 10x more "fair and balanced" than Fox. MSNBC spends most of its day running right-wing douche bags like Scarborough and Andrea Mitchell. Then, for a few hours each night, they toss a bone to the liberal masses via Rachel and LO'D and Ed. Off-hours, they just run prison shows. I challenged anyone to find me a comparable period on Fox wherein they run "liberal" programs the way MSNBC runs hard-core conservative programs. Of course, no one could. But the meme lives on...MSNBC is no different than Fox. You have to admit, Fox's PR machine is brilliant.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Keep fighting the good fight
They will learn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
15. Please, please, PLEASE let Rupert and his companies get sued
into proverty! PULLLEASEEEEE!!!! If there is ONE peice of shit that deserves to drink gutter water at night it is Rupert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. I'd pop champagne
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
19. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
20. All that popcorn is making me thirsty
Join me in one of these?

:toast:

http://mediamatters.org/blog/201107070019

As we noted this week, when Murdoch purchased the Wall Street Journal in 2007 he immediately selected his loyal aide and longtime confidant Les Hinton to run the Dow Jones Company and become publisher of the newspaper.

But prior to taking over Murdoch’s American publishing jewel, Hinton ran the mogul’s British newspapers, including News of the World. And Hinton ran the newspapers at a time when the tabloid was hacking mobile phones at an astonishing rate.

~~~

Hinton, a veteran journalist himself, was tasked with finding out the truth about phone hacking inside News Corp.’s tabloid. He came away with Pollyannaish findings, claiming Murdoch’s operation was clean, except for one bad apple. As I noted previously, it’s an investigation that, in light of recent developments, looks to have been incompetent at best, and a fraud at worst. In fact, it looks to have been part of a failed cover-up.

For the record, Hinton also authorized payments to the News of the World reporter at the heart of the hacking scandal, as well as for the private detective that reporter hired. Hinton authorized the payments after both men had been jailed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
21. K & R. Oh hell yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC