Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How does 'nut' erase 'rightwing'?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 07:44 PM
Original message
How does 'nut' erase 'rightwing'?
Edited on Sat Jan-08-11 07:47 PM by Warren Stupidity
I understand why the mainstream media would like to erase the 'rightwing' part of this tragedy, but I do not quite understand why people here seem to be pushing the same line.

A rightwing nutjob shot 18 people in an attack on a Democratic Congresswoman. Nut or not, this was an act of political terrorism inspired by three years of relentlessly violent hate speech directed from the top of the Republican Party leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. You are correct...
We should not attempt to just make this into another loon gone nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. thank you. i am having a bet of a problem with it too. we didnt say we were concerned with rational
hearing the hate talk, but the looneys hearing rw hate talk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Because thus far you can't really categorise his political insanities?
Edited on Sat Jan-08-11 07:56 PM by Spider Jerusalem
I don't think it'd necessarily be accurate to describe him as "right wing" based on what's known at this point; I can understand you may want to do so because a Democratic Congresswoman was shot, but you shouldn't let your personal political prejudices blind you to the facts either (and the facts of the case are not in and little known at this point; so far it seems evident that he is psychotic in the clinical and not colloquial sense of the word).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. because what I've read of writings present as someone in a state of frank psychosis.
this isn't about the colloquial use of the word "nuts". He may or may not have been influenced by right wing rhetoric, but from what I've seen of his ramblings, he's psychotic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yup
Too many people making excuses. Here and on the msm crapalogs. Everyone is nuts to a degree, not everyone goes out shooting up political figures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuvNewcastle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. I believe the man is insane,
judging from what I've read and seen of his works on the internet. I believe a psychiatrist will probably diagnose him as psychotic if it hasn't been done already. This is not "making excuses" for the man or the right wing in general. It's an acknowledgement that Loughner is not responsible for his actions and that what ever political theory he might embrace has at best a tangential relationship to those acts. Psychotic people don't think in a linear, logical way. And assigning blame to some third party because of some ugly things she said can backfire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. yes and how does that erase 'rightwing'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuvNewcastle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Psychotic people don't really have ideologies.
They have conglomerates of ideas chosen from one tree, another kind of tree, and then a rose bush. I knew a maniac who went to church with my parents. He was fixated on abortion. Every time I saw him, he was raving about abortion. The Barnes and Noble had to kick him out of there because he wouldn't quit bothering people about abortion. Eventually the church also turned him away. Could you call that man a Republican? Hell no, because he knew nothing of economics, civil liberties, etc. His mind had fixated on abortion and, like a dog chasing his tail, he couldn't let go. That's what I'm talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Ted Kasinski
but I digress - you have diagnosed this person as psychotic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuvNewcastle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Of course not.
Read post 12. I just entertain all sorts of ideas and I think that it's a good possibility that Loughman is psychotic. I have misgivings about stating that, as I said below, because we have little knowledge about the crime right now and because of some holes in the theory which I also mentioned. I don't like this blame game we're playing with the right wing at this time. Our side has gone and attacked Sister Sarah and you can bet the Spinmeisters will be all over the talk shows in the morning. This is an ugly way for our country to exist -- one side blaming the other, no evidence needed. Let's see some more evidence before we start blaming third parties. That is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gamow Donating Member (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. At first I agreed, reading his rants...
but now that the FBI seems to think that he did not work alone, I believe that there had to be some sort of organized insanity driving the act. Teabaggers would be the first insane organization of people to consider.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. the whole insanity thing is falling apart
as I said, it is mostly irrelevant to the plain fact that this was an attempted political assassination, and now that it appears that more than one person was involved, we have an organized conspiracy to commit a political assassination. It is an act of political terrorism. The sanity of the actors does not really matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuvNewcastle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. It's early in the investigation and we could all
be wrong. The main thing my theory has going against it is probability. Unlike in the movies, psychotics aren't usually violent. For a psychotic person to commit such a deed, he would have to have more control over his actions than most psychotics do. I am critical about my theory, but I keep coming back to the fact that there is every indication that the man is disturbed. Whether he had help or whether he planned this is something we will have to wait and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. Few here are medically qualified to diagnose mental illness, yet
many trot out this right wing meme as if it were holy truth, based entirely on what they have read and heard.

It reminds me of Frist's diagnosis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC