Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"What's Wrong With This Country" in a nutshell.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 07:52 PM
Original message
"What's Wrong With This Country" in a nutshell.
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/christiane-amanpour-uses-such-a-fancy-word-abc-has-to-define-it-in-a-graphic/

This is either unintentionally hilarious or merely bizarre, but either way it seemed worthy of some attention. On This Week, during an extremely sophisticated and insightful debate on the importance of the Constitution, Christiane Amanpour apparently attempted to keep the conversation at an elevated level of intelligence by showcasing an SAT-worthy word in the middle of her statement. Amanpour casually said “perspicacious,” yet dropping such a big word apparently served as a bat signal for the ABC graphics department to go into emergency action!

Amanpour’s guest mentioned Benjamin Franklin wrote that he wouldn’t mind being preserved in a “vat of Madeira wine” in order to see if the Constitution held up 200 years later. Amanpour responded, “he was amazingly perspicacious when this Constitution was signed.” Some viewers might want to roll their eyes in response to Amanpour’s use of such “elite” language, while others might appreciate that she doesn’t dumb down her thoughts for television. Either way, what was truly peculiar was the on-screen graphic. Were producers worried that the word would fly so far over their audience’s head that they needed to intervene as a public service? And if so, why not define “vat” and “Madeira wine” while you’re at it? Or is This Week now like Pop-Up Video with explanatory details and interesting facts popping up to complement what’s happening on screen?

One possibility is that Amanpour was quoting her guest’s own language from something previously written, yet if that was the case, shouldn’t the graphic have shown the quote rather simply provide Webster’s dictionary definition for one word? Yet my preferred, and admittedly less probable theory, is that someone on the This Week staff humorously thinks viewers need the equivalent of Cliff Notes to understand what Amanpour is talking about half the time. Either way, if Amanpour herself was truly perspicacious, she might avoid using such fancy language so that viewers in the future don’t mistake her show for a Rosetta Stone class teaching the English language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fer chrissakes, I'm over 50, in COLLEGE, and get looked at funny if I use a big word - it's AMERICA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Perzactly!
Even if the vocabulary was over the viewers heads, why "talk down" to them by showing "flash cards"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. so all of our problems boil down to not enough people knowing
Edited on Thu Jul-07-11 11:38 PM by hfojvt
the meaning of the word 'perspicacious'?

A word that I just had to look up.

I would think more serious problems for our country are a surfeit of superciliousness and a dearth of supererogation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC