from OnTheCommons.org:
Does Making Streets into Commons "Irk" Drivers--or Enliven Cities?
Zurich--famous for its conservatism--shows how to create a city for everyoneBy Jay Walljasper
The New York Times this week ran an intriguing article about efforts in European cities like Zurich, Barcelona, Paris, London, Munich and Stockholm to level the playing field between motorists and everyone else on city streets. It appeared on page one with the inflammatory headline: “Across Europe, Irking Drivers is Urban Policy.”
The message is clear: Looking upon the streets as commons to be shared by all threatens our God-given right to drive wherever we want, as often as want, as fast as we can. Yet if you read the article all the way through, reporter Elisabeth Rosenthal uncovers many reasons why reducing auto use has been a positive step in these cities: safer streets, cleaner air, less noise, more urban vitality, less dependence on foreign oil, and reduced global warming emissions.
She describes Limmatquai, a street in Zurich, as “a riverside pedestrian zone lined by cafes that used to be two lanes of gridlock.”
Indeed, these policies are remarkably popular with the people. In Zurich, the focus of this article, no street can be closed to traffic without being approved by voters in a referendum. Even the shopkeepers, who vigorously opposed the creation of pedestrian streets and reduction in parking spots, have seen no drop in business. That’s because pedestrian traffic rises 30-40 percent on Zurich streets with no cars or trucks. ............(more)
The complete piece is at:
http://onthecommons.org/does-making-streets-commons-irk-drivers-or-enliven-cities