Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congratulations President Obama, you did what 8 years of Bush could not

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
EvolveOrConvolve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:27 PM
Original message
Congratulations President Obama, you did what 8 years of Bush could not
You removed any hope that I had left for our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Jesus, you give up easy. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EvolveOrConvolve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Sadly, no
That's what's so disheartening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It's like you're leaving during the 4th inning because your team is down
a couple of points. You KNOW the outcome!

You know it ain't over 'til it's over. Snap out of it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EvolveOrConvolve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I wish that were so
The 4th inning was probably the Nixon years. We're in extra innings now and our closer just walked out on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
28. Don't agree, but I like the analogy! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dept of Beer Donating Member (957 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. The team apparently is the 1918 Black Soxs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SolutionisSolidarity Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
34. It's like you leave when you realize that your star players are throwing the game.
If Obama does this, then at least we finally and unequivocally know where he and the Democratic Party stand. That's a valuable service, so we should be grateful to Obama for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. I think you lack stamina and fortitude.
Things weren't too sanguine during the Nixon years. I didn't give up then. Reagan wasn't a cakewalk, either. But hey, whatever--grab your ball and run along home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Its sad isn't it
It seems as though the Republicans have finally succeeded in what they have been trying to do for decades, stop the left from voting. You might as well close your DU account and never post here again if you ever plan on not voting because by not voting you throw the entire political process out the window.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Yeah, but tell that to the OP--he might not read it in your reply to me! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. It was actually more of a general reply to anyone who's thinking about not voting. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
49. No, Obama gave us up.
In the interest of being "bipartisan" with a party that has no interest whatsoever in being anything but partisan.

We've been sold out. FDR and Truman are rolling over in their graves.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. Were you an Obama supporter during the election?
I paid close attention to what he said as a candidate. He was pretty careful to parse. Clinton parsed too, but she caught shit for it, and Obama didn't.

That's usually a clue, when the language is a bit tortured. I don't think Obama sold us out, though, even though he wasn't my first choice for the office. He's doing the best he can with a divided legislature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wish I could recommend your post 1000 times. MEDICARE AND SS ARE UNTOUCHABLE. nt
Edited on Thu Jul-07-11 09:30 PM by Sarah Ibarruri
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Sarah, he hasn't touched them! I THINK he's just talking about
shaving costs, NOT benefits, and if he goes after the benefits, the House won't support it!

They ARE untouchable but they haven't been touched yet! Just hang on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. By getting rid of COLA you cut Social Security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. AFAIK, nothing has been cut yet.
I haven't even seen a proposal dropped onto Congress for discussion at this point. For all we know, this a trial balloon to fire up the base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. And if it is should I respond differently?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. They didn't "get rid" of COLA...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. That is what is being discussed... among other cuts actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Yes, he has touched Social Security. Remember, he put together a "holiday"
from putting into it when he agreed to extend the Bush tax cuts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
32. Actually, no, but I'm sure you're correct. I meant THIS
time around, but that's even MORE reason not to do it.

I am SO against touching anything that might affect what a person receives, but I'm also hopeful that since this is such a hot topic for ALL Americans, they may back off (both Obama AND the Republicans).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. Pelosi (and the majority of Americans) agree. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
35. Both require actual management over time - "untouchable" things fail by themselves
If you look at the history, ( http://www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/2006/506/infocus/p15.htm is a good source of information) the programs have had regular changes made to them over time, which generally reflects good stewardship - people in government doing their job. Even the Reagan administration managed to strengthen the program long-term.

Long-term, its always based on projections and assumptions, many of which are bound to be wrong. The program needs to be responsibly managed, and if they become untouchable or are just left to autopilot, they wind up broken down off in the weeds somewhere, no longer working.

The possible change that everyone is so upset about today is simply the use of a different formula for cost of living increases - not actually a cut, but potentially a slowing down of increases. That's not good, but we may as well admit that the current CPI adjustments have been a scam for many years.

Moving to another formula is no barrier to also switching to a real set of inflation numbers as a basis as well? Or it would be easy to see how that might be accomplished after the fact, if the will or knowledge existed to actually improve something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. They should NEVER EVER EVER be mentioned in a talk about 'cutting,' period. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. It wasn't Obama who talked about "cutting", "slashing" or anything else
I believe it was a WAPO reporter citing an anonymous source.

You could get into an area of definition like in the debt ceiling negotiations, where closing a loophole or anything that increases revenue is equivalent to raising taxes, and any adjustment to SS, even if its to fix something innocuous or change how something is accounted for, if it technically leads to less money flowing out, could be called a "cut". To some extent, it depends of the opinions you bring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #38
43. If that's true, then someone from the WH needs to deny that. The fact they're not....
leads me to think it's true.

If someone lied through their ass about me, concerning something THAT IMPORTANT, I'd instantly deny it. This does not involve a birth certificate. This involves people's WELL BEING. The WH needs to deny this if it's a lie, but I'm beginning to think it's not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #43
46. I wish you would stop with the "has to deny" business.
Should you have to go around denying everything somebody else said about you?

Prove a negative prove a negative prove a negative.

Hope you never get on a jury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #46
48. Yes. If it's something huge and reflects VERY badly upon the person.
To not do so, would be to admit the statement is true. He needs to TELL his base that he 'WOULD NEVER DO THAT.' When I hear him say that, I'll be calm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. What did he do? What DIDN'T he do? I must have missed the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. See what you get for not upgrading to that higher tier broadband connection?
I must confess, I too have an internet connection that only works for current and past news coverage. I just can't afford the kind of internet that delivers news from the future to my desktop today.

I feel like such a luddite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. heh n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. Ha ha ha ha ha! Geez, I want one of those, too! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. Nancy Pelosi has already drafted a statement denouncing cutting SS...
If that isn't proof enough that it is actually on the table... then what do you want?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
31. Yeah! The poster's pc didn't even come equipped with a crystal ball...
like yours did. What a lamer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
39. Best. Post. Of the WHOLE Day
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. Social Security is on the table.
It is now and will be from now on part of the budget process. It should not be. There is no reason for a Democratic President to place it there. No reason. It is there.

For all that you say that nothing has been done yet. The fact that it is part of the negotiations is despicable.

gately, I want to love him. I want him to be the best President ever. I just don't agree with his decisions here. I can't agree. And while we can listen to all the soothing talk of how it won't be as bad as all that, we shouldn't have these concerns. If a good economy is all about confidence, this isn't the way to achieve that. It simply isn't. This is truly frightening. The Republicans know this. They pushed him over the line and it seems that he's stepping over without resistance. It's not a good thing politically. It's not a good thing economically. It is not a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #27
47. Of course it should be on the table'
Strengthening it by raising of eliminating the income cap and/or imposing means testing for the level of benefits is absolutely worth discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
16. ofo. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonn1997 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
24. Well put
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
26. Sorry to hear you were such a pushover!
But I hope you stick around to hear how things go, after all the hair-trigger exploding heads have had their say on the misinformation of the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Change Happens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #26
50. lol...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #26
51. How are those fixes to the healthcare bill coming along?
Remember all that shit about how it didn't matter that the public option was left out, because they'd "fix the bill" later? 'Just be calm', the apologists said. 'Have some faith', they said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
29. Awww...
And he did all this ... (whatever he did) ... just to mess with you too. Sucks, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
33. "You removed any hope that I had left for our country."
....amen, brother....right now, he may have the Democratic nomination, but be he ain't no Democrat....and Democrats vote for Democrats....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
36. Obama was always aligned to the Koch Bros.....
..a sad joke on the American People.. meet the new boss......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #36
41. Oh, is that why they have pledged $80M to Republican groups to defeat Obama next year?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hand_With_Eyes Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
40. Sadly ironic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
42. Don't blame the president. Blame VOTERS. Elections have consequences.
AS does pouting and sitting out elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #42
53. Well, what can I say about this post...
It's the second best post in this thread, right after the higher-tier internet one!

I'm one of those "Vote or Shut Up" types, myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
44. I am very optimistic about my country. I'm proud of President Obama.
Edited on Fri Jul-08-11 06:54 AM by robcon
His accomplishments are tremendous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
45. If you had any hope after Bush's second election then you were a dreamer. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC