SDuderstadt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:25 PM
Original message |
|
Obama has to "negotiate" with the GOP?
Hint: This is what happens when PEOPLE DON'T VOTE!
I'm not accusing anyone here of not voting in the 2010 election, irrespective of their "bugged" status.
|
Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:27 PM
Response to Original message |
|
the 2010 elections had nothing to do with his capitulation to them in 2008. He almost broke his fucking neck trying to bend over backwards to kiss bipartisan ass.
Next? :eyes:
|
SDuderstadt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Maybe you could learn how to play... |
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
Joe the Revelator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. So those whom disagree with you are paid shills? |
SDuderstadt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
MilesColtrane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
55. How many posts per chicken is the not-DLC paying these days? |
|
I need to get in on some of that sweet, sweet poultry!
|
SDuderstadt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #55 |
|
Edited on Fri Jul-08-11 12:44 AM by SDuderstadt
squabs.
I work directly for the Iluminati. TPTB are looking at acquiring me, though.
The bastards make you pay a dowry, but the bennies are great and the pay is okay.
|
MilesColtrane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #56 |
65. The Illuminati drive a hard bargain. |
|
I would think they'd settle for no less than a good prospect from the farm system and a low first round pick for you.
|
SDuderstadt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #65 |
|
I have fired over 289 so far.
It might have something to do with the messy logistics of giving them 15% of a squab.
|
MilesColtrane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #66 |
67. So...just dark meat, hunh? |
|
Edited on Fri Jul-08-11 12:56 AM by MilesColtrane
No thanks. "SHOW ME THE MCNUGGETS!"
|
SDuderstadt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #67 |
dionysus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
31. why SDuderstadt, maybe poker's just not their game. i know. how about a spelling contest? |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-07-11 11:44 PM by dionysus
(jesus you tossed that one over the plate)
:rofl:
|
SDuderstadt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
|
You madcap! Where you going with that poker table?
|
dionysus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
37. you tell that poker table i'm comin!! you tell em the law's comin! and hell's comin with me!!!11!11! |
SDuderstadt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #37 |
|
I'm sorry. I forgot you were there. You may go now.
Leave the poker table.
|
dionysus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #38 |
43. SDuderstadt, you're not wearing a bustle. how lewd. |
SDuderstadt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #43 |
75. I believe that you... |
|
just might be the anti-christ.
|
dbonds
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
68. Poker?, I think the game might be called Snooker. |
Liberal Veteran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
10. I'm not going to fault Obama for trying to bring sanity back to Washington. |
|
I have to admit as much as I despise republicans, even I was taken aback by their unwillingness to work as a team for the good of this country.
At this point, I'm pretty well convinced they would shit on the original Constitution, tie a rubber band around it, light it on fire, and ring the White House doorbell and run away and then scream "LOOK! THE EVIL BLACK GUY IS STOMPING ON THE CONSTITUTION!!!!"
|
deutsey
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
78. After 8 years of Bush's "my way or the highway" bullshit, |
|
Edited on Fri Jul-08-11 12:58 PM by deutsey
I supported Obama's attempt to negotiate at first, even as I personally felt lukewarm toward him and those in his inner circle.
But then, as it always happens, it just seemed as though the GOP deceived and led him on and he just kept going along with their ruses as they unleashed their anti-health reform shenanigans.
I wish at some point Obama would have said something like:
"We have negotiated with the other side in good faith but it's obvious that they have chosen to use tactics of obstruction and distraction while millions of Americans are in danger of losing their homes, their jobs, their access to the American dream. I and the Democratic members of Congress are now going to move forward to do the serious work that the overwhelming marjority of Americans elected us to do."
That's just off the top of my head; I'm sure some highly paid WH speechwriter could come up with a rhetorically spiffier version.
|
Wait Wut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
That was awesome! And, you are correct.
|
leftstreet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:29 PM
Response to Original message |
3. This is what happens when Democratic politicians BLOW their majority |
|
The Obama Admin and the Dems had 2 years
|
Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
he only had a mandate and political capital out of the ass but he didn't have a sooperdooperpooper majority...so it couldn't have been his fault that he didn't get anything done. And besides...he couldn't end up hurting their widdle feelings, could he?
|
leftstreet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
13. We need 250% majority of 600 votes - everyone knows that! |
SDuderstadt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
leftstreet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
21. Why do you always say 'strawMAN?' That seems sexist |
SDuderstadt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
24. Blame the people that... |
|
selected that as the label for the fallacy.
|
Liberal Veteran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
16. We'll just ignore the fact that Reid didn't do his job in this. |
|
Let's be real honest here, President Obama got knifed in the back more than once by his "majority" in the senate.
To say otherwise is ignoring reality.
|
SDuderstadt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
20. I would rather Russ Feingold was... |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-07-11 11:37 PM by SDuderstadt
ML, but he got defeated in the general.
|
Liberal Veteran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
28. No argument here. By not slapping down the likes of Nelson and Baucus, Reid... |
|
....essentially pissed a lot our momentum down the proverbial toilet.
|
SDuderstadt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
33. If you've ever read any of Robert Caro's masterful books on LBJ... |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-07-11 11:47 PM by SDuderstadt
It becomes clear that LBJ was a brutal, but effective ML.
|
dionysus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
40. as much as blame can be cast at obama, i'd like to for once see people admit |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-07-11 11:58 PM by dionysus
that our "60" included 5 or 6 blue dogs plus lieberman, any of whom went to the press saying they'd fillibuster dem bills like the health care deal.
harry reid was supposed to keep that shit in check. at least spread the blame around. obama shouldn't have had to have been president, the majority leader, speaker, and whip at the same time. come on. for all the "messiah" bullshit that got thrown around, it's like the people slinging it came to believe it.
when we have a systemic problem and people focus all the blame on one person they're predispositioned to bear all the blame on, and ignore everything else, it's crap.
|
leftstreet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #40 |
48. Obama had the political capital to twist ANY arm in DC |
|
One press conference from him could have destroyed ANY politician's future chances with the voters
|
dionysus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #48 |
51. do you really think a DC press conference would have gotten a blue dog from a state that voted for |
leftstreet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #51 |
53. Obama could have boiled kittens on live TV |
|
Getting voters to turn on a pol would have been a walk in the park
Not now though
|
dionysus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #53 |
59. that's where we beg to differ i suppose. |
Solomon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #53 |
76. LOL You're talking about Bush after 9-11. Not Obama. |
|
Obama never had it like that. "i want him to fail" right from the getgo.
I guess if you can forget about Blue dogs, you can forget that too.
|
RZM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
12. It beats blowing the lobbyists like they usually do . . . |
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
15. The neocon movement has taken forty years to even start chipping away at Social Security. n/t |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-07-11 11:35 PM by LoZoccolo
|
leftstreet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
23. They waited forty years for Obama? |
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
35. The major think tanks started in the seventies. |
|
They've been slowly making progress on turning a "third rail" into their next conquest. These things take work, time, a willingness to take what you can get at any given motment along the way, strategy, and a sustained propaganda effort. There has been a liberal resurgence since 2003 that's largely done little to work its way beyond a certain core constituency on the Internet, and is now engaged in infighting over progress versus perfection. We've blown about eight years.
In the 40 years that the neocon movement has been building, there has never been a streak as self-destructive as we're seeing now, not even the Tea Party.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
36. I am against cuts to Social Security. n/t |
RaleighNCDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #36 |
49. Then why do you support the Third Way dems, and Obama's |
|
commission which want to cut Social Security?
|
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #49 |
54. I think different members of the commission disagree with each other, don't they? |
|
How could I support all of them at once?
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #54 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #69 |
71. I think you'd get more out of the conversation if you focused on issues rather than |
|
be distracted by the task of insulting me.
|
Tx4obama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
32. No, the dems did not have a real majority in the senate for 2 years, we had only 49 days. |
|
Al Franken was not sworn in until July 2009 and Teddy Kennedy died in August 2009.
We had 60 votes in the Senate for only 49 days.
And as we all know, in order for the dems to get anything passed in the Senate we need 60 votes to break filibusters in order to invoke cloture.
|
Fearless
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-09-11 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #32 |
82. We should have let them filibuster every fucking bill then... showing the nation what the rethugs.. |
|
Edited on Sat Jul-09-11 01:03 AM by Fearless
Really are instead of appearing weak and useless for two years going on four.
Edit: Sp
|
Fearless
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-09-11 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
Sarah Ibarruri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:31 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I don't think he should negotiate with the Repukes, but I do think 8 years of GW Bush |
|
and lots of centrist thinking in this country has brought us to the very sad present.
|
SDuderstadt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
11. Do the math in the... |
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:33 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Here are "progressives" on the Huffington Post gloating over Democratic losses in 2010. |
SDuderstadt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
22. They're going to try it again too. |
|
They have no idea how they're going to get what they want from it. Ask them and they'll give you their next move and nothing beyond it.
|
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
70. They claim that it's "proof" that "progressive candidates" win. |
|
That is, the "blue dogs" were "too right wing" and the ... progressives voted for the even more right wing? It's really a dumb argument to be sure.
|
uponit7771
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
18. Yeap, they were VERY happy dems lost in 2010 |
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
39. Read the comments. n/t |
RaleighNCDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:37 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Does it bug you that people don't vote? |
|
That's what happens when you capitulate to the GOP.
“Whenever a fellow tells me he's bipartisan I know he's going to vote against me” Harry S Truman
|
SDuderstadt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
|
would you like a link to math literacy and strategy websites?
|
hulka38
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:39 PM
Response to Original message |
26. The fault for what has happened to the Democratic Party |
|
lies overwhelmingly at the feet of its leaders.
|
SDuderstadt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
29. Why don't you lay that out for us? |
|
Specifics, not generalities, please.
|
hulka38
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
72. The last 2.5 years shouldn't require a detailed explanation. |
SDuderstadt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 04:13 AM
Response to Reply #72 |
|
"begging the question", dude.
|
Marr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:53 PM
Response to Original message |
41. No, it bugs me that he uses right-wing frames and arguments himself. |
|
His "negotiations" with the GOP are matters of speed, not direction.
|
SDuderstadt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #41 |
|
Edited on Fri Jul-08-11 12:01 AM by SDuderstadt
A swing and a miss on my part.
My abject apologies.
|
Marr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:59 PM
Original message |
What are you talking about? |
|
Did you mean to respond to someone else?
|
SDuderstadt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:53 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I am sick as a dog in a strdange hotel I have never stayed in in a town I have never visited.
dionysus! Proceed, suh!
|
erodriguez
(532 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:55 PM
Response to Original message |
44. Bullshit. I vote. I voted for obama. I voted for my senators , representatives etc. |
|
This happens when those you vote for (the pres) listen to those who have mney instead of average folk.
|
SDuderstadt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #44 |
|
I wasn't even addressing you. Read the OP again.
|
dionysus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-07-11 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #46 |
47. pure as the driven snow, i am sure... |
SDuderstadt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #47 |
|
My TB is acting up.
I think I need to go challenge Johnny Ringo.
|
dionysus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #50 |
52. i hope the strain... isn't more than you could bear.... |
SDuderstadt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #52 |
58. I am taking a strainer... |
|
nickel-plated and concealable, of course.
|
erodriguez
(532 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #46 |
57. Who are you addressing then? |
|
People who dont vote? This is the DU. id bet 95% voted in 08 and 10 here.
The fact is that we CONTROL the senate and the whitehouse.
The POTUS doesn't give a fuck. He and other "Democrats" are spaouting Bullshit republican talking points, and are about to fck over 90% of American citizens.
|
SDuderstadt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #57 |
60. Did I say anything about DU? |
|
Hint: no.
The tea leaf reading class is down that hallway.
|
erodriguez
(532 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #60 |
61. Preaching to the choir then. |
|
Edited on Fri Jul-08-11 12:30 AM by erodriguez
|
SDuderstadt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #61 |
|
I work on getting people to vote. How about you?
|
erodriguez
(532 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #62 |
63. News flash! regardless of your work, it is not working. |
|
Stop blaming people who dont vote and start pushing the peopel we do elet to do the right thg.
|
SDuderstadt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #63 |
|
The Dems in Congress can just do whatever they want and ignore the opposition party.
|
RaleighNCDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-09-11 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #64 |
80. People will come back and support a politician who fights and loses. |
|
They will walk away from a poliltician who refuses to fight.
The Governor here objected to big chunks of the Republican legislature's budget. They passed it. She vetoed it. They overrode her veto.
She's guaranteed my vote next time around.
Had she not made that attempt at a fight, not vetoed the budget, the result might have been the same, but she would not be worth my vote next time.
"The best lack all conviction, while the worst Are full of passionate intensity." W B Yeats
That pretty much defines the national party.
I'm not wasting my time with those who lack all conviction.
|
TheKentuckian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 06:35 AM
Response to Original message |
74. Or when people do. Obama was and is a fool for legitimizing the TeaPubliKlans |
|
and pretending their failed ideology is anything but dangerous and foolish nonsense and a pack of lies.
Bipartisanship is either weapons grade stupid, cover for collusion, dangerously naive, or a nefarious plot.
|
Bonobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-09-11 11:19 AM
Response to Original message |
83. Simplistic post reeking of reductionist faulty logic. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:20 PM
Response to Original message |