Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

James Murdoch could face criminal charges on both sides of the Atlantic

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
tpsbmam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 03:26 PM
Original message
James Murdoch could face criminal charges on both sides of the Atlantic
From the Guardian UK:

James Murdoch and News Corp could face corporate legal battles on both sides of the Atlantic that involve criminal charges, fines and forfeiture of assets as the escalating phone-hacking scandal risks damaging his chances of taking control of Rupert Murdoch's US-based media empire.

As deputy chief operating officer of News Corp – the US-listed company that is the ultimate owner of News International (NI), which in turn owns the News of the World, the Times, the Sunday Times and the Sun – the younger Murdoch has admitted he misled parliament over phone hacking, although he has stated he did not have the complete picture at the time. There have also been reports that employees routinely made payments to police officers, believed to total more than £100,000, in return for information.

The payments could leave News Corp – and possibly James Murdoch himself – facing the possibility of prosecution in the US under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) – legislation designed to stamp out bad corporate behaviour that carries severe penalties for anyone found guilty of breaching it – and in the UK under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 which outlaws the interception of communications.

Tony Woodcock, a partner at the City law firm Stephenson Harwood, said section 79 of the 2000 Act enabled criminal proceedings to be brought against not only a company, but also a director or similar officer where the offence was committed with their "consent or connivance" or was "attributable to any neglect on their part". Woodcock said: "This could embrace a wide number of people at the highest level within an organisation, such as a chief executive – not just the individual who 'pushed the button' allowing the intercept to take place or someone (perhaps less senior) who encouraged or was otherwise an accessory to the offence, such as an editor."


IMO it would never happen here -- Holder doesn't prosecute rich people. IF they discovered they hacked into any of the first family's phones or something similar, he might get off his ass. But barring that, he's too busy going after anti-war groups and legal medical cannabis dispensaries & patients. I hope the Brits throw the book at both Murdochs.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree. Ain't gonna happen here.
Plutocracies don't prosecute plutocrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You beat me to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sadly, you're right...he'll get a parade here, not prosecution...knr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. We didn't lift a finger to prosecute GWB as a war criminal
what makes people think we will prosecute someone on the Right with more power then GWB? Murdoch is loved by the apeshit crazy crowd in America and the M$M will be more then happy to help James stay out of prison...it is one of their own afterall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Then why were they deleting all those emails
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Because the Brits are a lot more likely to prosecute than Holder.
For one thing, it's been splashed all over their news media, unlike here. There will be at least some token beheadings of mid-level bureaucrats there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. We should thank the US Guardian
They were on it from day one - others joined recently
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. There are some eerie parallels from here to there.
Edited on Fri Jul-08-11 03:42 PM by LiberalAndProud
Murdoch liked Tony Blair a lot. Caused some hard feeling between his close associates. Evidently he had an interest in Jimmy Carter as well, which surprised me when I saw an allusion to that here http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/adamcurtis/2011/01/rupert_murdoch_-_a_portrait_of.html

Fascinating, huh?

And then there is this:
Speaking at the Wall Street Journal D6 conference in Carlsbad, California, Murdoch was asked by veteran tech correspondent Walt Mossberg if he had played a part in the New York Post's endorsement of Obama.

"Yeah," he replied, candidly. The select audience of entrepreneurs and digital business executives at the conference earlier this week cheered, as can be seen in the accompanying video.

"We're on the verge of a complete phenomenon," Murdoch said. "Politicians are at an all-time low and are despised by 80% of the public, and then you've got a candidate trying to put himself out above it all. He's become a rock star. It's fantastic.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/may/30/rupertmurdoch.wallstreetjournal

These are just things that make me go hmmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. does any one know HOW they were able to hack so many phones?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC