sudopod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 05:55 PM
Original message |
I think getting rid of saying "on the table" should be on the table. |
|
Edited on Fri Jul-08-11 05:56 PM by sudopod
It's a finite table, it can only hold so much. Think about how much time it would waste if the table broke and everything fell off. Then nothing would be on the table.
|
LiberalAndProud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 05:58 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Agreed. The Republicans stole the table. There is no table, |
|
How can there be anything on it.
No more taking off or putting on. No more table.
|
northoftheborder
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
sudopod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. If we wanted a table, we should have thought about that before being poor. |
|
Edited on Fri Jul-08-11 06:02 PM by sudopod
Maybe we could rent a table for $20 a month for 18 months.
|
LiberalAndProud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 06:17 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Wait, maybe we can borrow Ryan's table. I heard there's a bottle of wine there. |
sudopod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. We could sell the bottle of wine and buy two tables. nt |
Fozzledick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 06:55 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I think the table itself should be on the table - recursively |
|
If that doesn't work, then we can take the table off the table.
|
sudopod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Is it tables all the way down? nt |
Fozzledick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. I'm not sure, is the table on a turtle? |
sudopod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. I've seen tables carved in the shape of turtles. It could be both! nt |
Fozzledick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. Does that mean you can't take the turtle off the table? |
sudopod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. Only if you're really fast at it, like Houdini. nt |
sudopod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
12. If the table is in the set of all things on the table, wouldn't that |
Fozzledick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
14. So you're saying the table should be off the table? |
sudopod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-09-11 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
jberryhill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 11:27 PM
Response to Original message |
13. I will not throw the table under the bus |
|
Even if the bus is jumping the shark!
|
Fozzledick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
15. How about creating more jobs under the table? |
0rganism
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 11:33 PM
Response to Original message |
16. How much is this damned table costing us every year anyway? |
|
Maybe eliminating it could lower the deficit significantly!
|
Fozzledick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
19. So maybe the table should be tabled |
sudopod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-09-11 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
21. The table is off the table, then? nt |
0rganism
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-09-11 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
22. or at least close some loopholes to make the table more efficient? |
|
Edited on Sat Jul-09-11 12:38 AM by 0rganism
Perhaps we need a special Table Tax so the table can be self-funding? I propose the Special Allocation for Legislative Tabling act, which we can mix with a payroll tax, like the Professional Employers' Planar Payroll Eligibility Restructuring fund. That way, we can put SALT and PEPPER on the table.
|
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 11:36 PM
Response to Original message |
17. All the tables are made in China these days. |
Fearless
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-11 11:41 PM
Response to Original message |
18. I thought they were all recalled due to lead paint. n/t |
LiberalAndProud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-09-11 12:36 PM
Response to Original message |
sudopod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-09-11 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
24. No more things are going on that table, for certain. |
|
Unfortunately, they will likely buy a new table with lasers and other classified stuff for $500,000 and hide it in the black budget.
Then they'll put Social Security on it.
|
Quantess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-09-11 01:47 PM
Response to Original message |
25. In a nutshell, that's truth to power! |
|
Let's touch base so I can give you a heads up about what's off the table.
|
sudopod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-09-11 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
27. I feel our synergy will make a huge impact on the zeitgeist. nt |
surrealAmerican
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-09-11 01:51 PM
Response to Original message |
26. This whole thread is making me want ... |
Quantess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-10-11 09:16 AM
Response to Original message |
28. What happens under the table? |
Fozzledick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-10-11 12:34 PM
Response to Original message |
29. So I guess taking saying "on the table" off the table is off the table |
|
But the table is still on the turtle, and taking the turtle off the table is effectively off the table.
Unless I missed something. :crazy:
PS: Boehner is still off his rocker, and Ryan is off the reservation.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 10th 2024, 04:45 PM
Response to Original message |