Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The 1995 flame out of Jon Cowan, now the leader of Third Way..defacto Dem policy shop. Stunning.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 07:57 PM
Original message
The 1995 flame out of Jon Cowan, now the leader of Third Way..defacto Dem policy shop. Stunning.
Not long ago, the president of the Third Way made a strange comment. Here's the guy who is claiming to be the head of a "progressive" think tank announcing that he once led an anti-deficit group which lobbied outside the AARP for big changes to reform Social Security. He actually bragged about that group in a Third Way article.

AARP Opens the Door to Social Security Changes – Offers more than “milk and cookies”

“Two decades ago, I co-founded a group of young people, Lead…Or Leave, that demanded major changes in Social Security. I helped lead the first – and probably the only – protest in front of AARP’s building. With hundreds of young people shouting on the sidewalk, AARP’s leaders invited us in to talk. But when we saw the conference table was set with milk and cookies, we knew they weren’t serious. Now, at long last, they are.”


He also brags about that group in his bio at The Arena at Politico.

Jonathan Cowan


Picture courtesy of The Arena at Politico

Jonathan Cowan is the President and a co-founder of Third Way. He has over 15 years experience at senior levels of progressive politics and government. Previously, Mr. Cowan was a Visiting Fellow at Harvard’s Institute of Politics, teaching a course on youth and political advocacy. A Clinton administration veteran, Mr. Cowan was chief of staff of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, helping to manage a federal agency of 9,000 employees with a $27 billion annual budget. He also served as Senior Advisor to the HUD Secretary and Acting Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs. Prior to co-founding Third Way, Mr. Cowan founded and ran Americans for Gun Safety, which The Washington Post dubbed the “dominant” group on the gun safety side of that debate. In 1992, he co-founded Lead…or Leave, which became the nation’s leading Generation X advocacy group. He also co-authored Revolution X and has been featured in many media outlets including The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, U.S. News & World Report, TIME, CNBC, Nightline and 60 Minutes.


He is the Third Way leader who gloated that Obama listened to his group and not to the progressives.

He gloated.

Jon Cowan is president and Jim Kessler is vice president for policy at Third Way, a progressive think tank.

Their words:

"That sound you’re hearing is the collective gasps of more than 200 progressive organizations who thought they successfully lobbied President Barack Obama to keep Social Security reform off the table in budget negotiations."


But WAIT...there's more. There was a really great Newsweek article in 1995 about the "flame-out" of his anti-deficit, anti-Social Security group. Note that they were planning to burn their Social Security cards.

Love this article.

Gen X's Dynamic Duo Flames Out

When Jon Cowan and Rob Nelson arrived on the Washington scene three years ago, the capital fell in love. The two twentysomethings were idealistic, savvy and cute--a cross between Robert Kennedy and Kato Kaelin. They formed a group called Lead . . . Or Leave, challenging members of Congress to cut the deficit-or get out of town. One hundred and one lawmakers took the pledge. Ross Perot praised the pair's spunk. U.S. News & World Report put them on its cover, hailing them as "the vanguard of the twentysomething backlash."

But Lead . . . Or Leave shut its doors this month. Cowan and Nelson closed their office, disconnected their phone and sent out resumes-just as Congress begins to debate entitlement reform, the very issue the two championed. Short on cash and on troops to lead, they have decided to leave. "If there have ever been smoke-and-mirror organizers, it's these two guys," says Heather McLeod, an editor of Who Cares, a magazine about youth activism. Telegenic and good at spin, Nelson and Cowan had short attention spans for the details of grass-roots organizing. They got around that problem by inflating membership numbers. Their literature boasted they represented 1 million people, but the pair acknowledges that only 1130,000 either gave money or attended Lead . . . Or Leave events. "There was fudging," admits Andrew Weinstein. who briefly worked as the group's communications director.


Now they are assuming leadership in determining the policies of our party? How is that possible?

It gets even weirder.

And the duo's cheekiness sometimes veered into immaturity. When they stuck a condom in a mailing to illustrate the need to "practice safe politics" by reforming spending, one conservative quit their board. At a meeting with the chief of staff of Sen. Bob Kerrey's blue-ribbon Entitlements Commission, the pair showed up in shorts. "They walked around like MTV stars wearing purple sunglasses and never returned anyone's phone calls." says Paul Hewitt, who started Americans for Generational Equity, a similar (and now defunct) group.


And more:

Cowan, also 30, hopes to be "part of a visionary leadership." But they still promise to make a big splash in the '96 campaign. "We will burn social-security cards in New Hampshire," says Cowan. "It's such an incredibly powerful image." And image is the one thing Cowan and Nelson have always understood.


Well, looks like Cowan sort of got his wish. Somebody, don't know who, made him a leader of a group that gives the impression that the Democratic party and its president answer to them. Not to the party's constituents, but to them....the Third Way.

When you look at their policies, compare them with what is coming out of the mouths of our president and his advisors....they just might be right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. What is Third Way's funding?
simple question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Better question. Why do they have the ear of the president?
And we don't?

Is there some invisible power they have that is unknowable to those of us who are ordinary people?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SolutionisSolidarity Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Like goes with like.
I didn't see it at the time, but we should have seen the third way style of politics in his campaign. He frequently hit upon the theme of "moving beyond the partisan fights" that have consumed our politics. I guess we all read into that what we wanted to, but the easiest way to move beyond an argument is to concede. We move beyond the fight over education by weakening teachers unions and moving to charter schools. We move beyond the social security fight by allowing the Republicans to do what they always want to do, cut benefits. We move beyond the fight over the wars by accepting them. We move beyond the fight over Wall Street by bailing them out without strings attached. It can't hurt that acting in favor of established interests generally pays better.

In short - it's not that he's listening to the wrong advisers. I think this is who he is. This is his ideology; he really believes in the University of Chicago worldview that's been so devastating to our once proud country. He's running out of time to evolve into something better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. "moving beyond the partisan fights"...aka bipartisanship..aka one party rule basically.
Good post. When I think of the lack of partisan fights, I think "one party". And that scares me to death. Our country won't survive that way, not as the America we once knew. Yes, I think that is who he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sulphurdunn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. There is but its not invisible.
It's called money. That's why Obama's chief of staff is a Third Way board member and why his administration is infested with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sulphurdunn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. Some links
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. I love how all the "serious" people always look like smug adolescent asswipes
Never fails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Don't they, though? Good point.
Almost every one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. He's got the kind of smirk -
that makes me want to immediately slap him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I know the feeling. The smirk of superiority.
I keep wondering who gave him all this power, why does the president listen to him and his policies?

What the hell is going on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sulphurdunn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. You mean like our former President
Chimpy McSmirk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
30. yes
ann coulter makes me feel the same way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
9. More about Gen-X and Lead or Leave. L.A, Times 1995 .
http://articles.latimes.com/print/1995-09-03/magazine/tm-41681_1_political-agenda-lead-mtv-vote

"To Nelson and Cowan, the federal debt symbolized the bankrupt politics of Washington. They also considered the debt a unifying force among their peers. Whatever differences exist among members of this cohort, they all would have to pay for the government's borrowing of today. Economists, naturally, disagree over the problems posed by the national debt and the need for severe deficit relief. But partisans on all sides concur that how the debt is reduced is an all-important part of any fiscal debate. Yet the Lead . . . or Leave pledge did not specify how the debt should be shrunk. Tax hikes? Military cuts? Social Security cuts? The message was: Just do it. This was politics without politics. No hard choices. A gimmick.

But it worked--to an extent. Nelson and Cowan, sassy and articulate, easily gained media notice as Gen Xers angry about one of the more esoteric, mind-numbing topics on the national scene. Defeated Democratic presidential candidate Paul E. Tsongas of Massachusetts and retiring Republican Sen. Warren B. Rudman of New Hampshire, who were organizing their own anti-debt organization, endorsed the pair's endeavor. Nelson and Cowan collected 100 signatures on the pledge from congressional candidates, and also managed to get Perot's.

..."About 20 who took the pledge--mainly Republicans and conservative Democrats--won their elections. More important than these unimpressive electoral results was that Nelson and Cowan, through their many appearances on MTV and other media, were lending a youthful face to anti-debt politics--territory previously dominated by rich old guys like Perot and former Commerce Secretary Pete Peterson, who each contributed to Lead . . . or Leave. Nelson and Cowan's hyperbolic attacks on Social Security jibed nicely with the assaults waged by Peterson, now an investment banker, and others who want to privatize the retirement system. (Perot and Peterson declined to be interviewed for this article.) Here was a self-styled youth movement with corporate connections. In three years, Nelson and Cowan raised $1.3 million, according to Cowan, with two-thirds of it from foundations, corporations and wealthy individuals.

The pair developed Lead . . . or Leave into an organization with a loose membership. Anyone who wrote to it in support was considered a member, and the group's database bulged with the names of tens of thousands. (Cowan says it peaked at 100,000. However, Andrew Weinstein, the group's communications director last year, disagrees and estimates the figure to be 30,000 to 40,000, with a third of those truly interested in steady participation.) They held rallies at campuses. Student governments at scores of colleges decided to affiliate and work with Lead . . . or Leave. Nelson and Cowan claimed they represented more than 1 million young people. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
999998th word Donating Member (555 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Smug, smarmy, deserves a smack upside the head..
for starters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
11. ^
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blkmusclmachine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 04:42 AM
Response to Original message
12. Arrogance. It drips from every pore.
Bet he met up with Obama at the Fundy's "President's Prayer Breakfast."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 05:58 AM
Response to Original message
13. More people need to learn about the poison pill that killed the
progressive movement in the United States. Thanks for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
14. We should have listened to the Who.
We sang that we "won't get fooled again."

Then we got fooled again and elected a New Democrat.

Oh well. Admitting you have a problem is the first step. The second step is the hard one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. Cowan advises the president. It blows my mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
15. Behold the face of the man who has the ear of leaders, and we don't.
That is tragic. A man who once thought it would be a funny stunt to burn Social Security cards in protest (of the deficit).

Makes me bitter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
18. Lead or Leave was one of Pete Peterson's front groups.
Jon Cowan exemplifies most of what is wrong the system now. He is a phony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. And they wanted to privatize Social Security....from a 1998 lead or leave website.
Their own words...actually the words of Cowan and Nelson from their book Revolution X.

"Reinvent Social Security
Problem: As the baby boomers retire, the U.S. will no longer be able to afford to pay out Social Security benefits without drastically raising taxes on younger workers.

Solution: Reinvent Social Security now in a way that is fair to all generations -- and protects today's at-risk seniors.
Detailed Proposal
See Revolution X, by Rob Nelson and Jon Cowan, pages 122-125. I will put this proposal on-line soon.
For More Information
This generationally fair benefits means-test has been endorsed by the National Taxpayers' Union, Citizens for a Sound Economy, and the American Association of Boomers. NTU fights for taxpayer savings, holding Congress's feet to the fire on many spending issues. CSE lobbies for a free-market economy and the lifting of government taxes and regulation. The formation of a private Social Security system is backed by the AAB, the leading advocacy group for boomers, although their membership benefits are available to anyone. To reach these groups, call

National Taxpayers' Union, (202) 543-1300
Citizens for a Sound Economy, (800) 925-7921
American Association of Boomers, (800) BOOMERS
"

CSE, isn't that Dick Armey's group? Looking up the others now.

http://ifindkarma.com/attic/LEAD/socsec.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. I remember Lead or Leave very well.
It was dedicated to convincing my generation (Cowan and I are the same age) that gramma and grampa were our mortal enemies, determined to leave us impoverished so they could luxuriate in solid platinum hip replacements and Gold Bond Powder.

They got lots of media back in the early 90s for a couple of college kids no one had ever heard of.

Cowan later went on to found a "gun safety" group dedicated to fighting gun control, also a front group for a rich guy with no sense of right and wrong.

He's made a good living off this sort of thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. I found this 1994 NY magazine article called Gen Hucksters...a fun read.
http://books.google.com/books?id=9uMCAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA102&lpg=PA102&dq=%22lead...or+leave%22+cowan&source=bl&ots=G69D3KHPP2&sig=kJ1fO3--jvMU8Wv1DDLv-6Lbn1g&hl=en&ei=dn8YTonqPKbf0QHe8LCXBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=9&ved=0CD0Q6AEwCDgK#v=onepage&q=%22lead...or%20leave%22%20cowan&f=false

You need to scroll up and down a little to get the full article.

Wish I could snip parts, but format won't let me.

Thanks for the comment. Cowan rubs me the wrong way, and why the hell does he have Obama's ear anyway. I read somewhere that he used the words gun "safety" instead of "control" because the DLC found it polled better.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #21
37. Huge mistake. The grandmas and grandpas of today were
the hippies of yesterday. I don't know about other grandpas and grandmas, but we get along extremely well with our children and grandchildren and always have.

We are all in the same boat in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
24. Thanks, google third way and democraticunderground ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Cowan is written all over that 2nd link. I absolutely love it!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Changing the Gun Debate
sounds similar

DLC | Blueprint Magazine | July 12, 2001
Changing the Gun Debate
By Jonathan Cowan and Jim Kessler

http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?kaid=119&subid=157&contentid=3560




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Nearly all the founders of Third Way were members of that group.
Edited on Sat Jul-09-11 01:47 PM by madfloridian
Now they control the party policy. Ain't it amazing? Here is a link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americans_for_Gun_Safety_Foundation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. They sure do have the ear of the Dems - FISA bill and telecom immunity ...
http://www.alternet.org/rights/75950/

'Third Way' Think Tank Pushes Telecom Agenda on FISA Bill

The so-called "progressive" organization is now revealed to carry water for the corporations.

February 5, 2008

"A think tank with close ties to the telecommunication industry has been working with a key Democrat in the Senate on a domestic surveillance bill that would provide telecommunications companies with retroactive immunity for possibly violating federal law by spying on American citizens at the behest of the Bush administration..."

FWIW a DU thread from when the FISA bill was being debated.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=3586367&mesg_id=3586367


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. I had forgotten about that Alternet article. Thanks for the link.
http://www.alternet.org/rights/75950

It's like they don't even have to work hard anymore....like the damage is done.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. You're welcome and they talk of the need to strengthen Medicare and SS ...
know I've heard that phrase recently and it was not from third way.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Thanks! Good links.
Kinda sad to see no responses at the time in the first one. A lot of this stuff fermenting under our noses for a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. My thoughts as well on the lack of replies in the first thread ...
:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
29. He has a face one would never tire of slapping. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
33. Humongous K & R !!!
:mad:

:nuke:

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
36. Kick !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
38. Unbelievable, just read several of your links on this guy.
He's got the personality of a 'Young Republican', a James O'Keefe and the tactics of someone who graduated from Karl Rove's two day seminars for political activists. AND, he 'has THIS president's ear'?

And people here think Obama will not touch SS!

The writing is all over the wall. And the more the left freaks out, I have a feeling, the more these people like it. Getting progressives upset seems to be a litmus test for this administration to know they are on the 'RIGHT' track.

Thanks MF for all you do to uncover these important issues. Too late to rec, but :kick: so more people can learn what we are up against, in our own Party!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
39. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC