Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MoJo:Wait, Did the USDA Just Deregulate All New Genetically Modified Crops?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 08:28 PM
Original message
MoJo:Wait, Did the USDA Just Deregulate All New Genetically Modified Crops?
It's a hoary bureaucratic trick, making a controversial announcement on the Friday afternoon before a long weekend, when most people are daydreaming about what beer to buy on the way home from work, or are checking movie times online. But that's precisely what the US Department of Agriculture pulled last Friday.

In an innocuous-sounding press release titled "USDA Responds to Regulation Requests Regarding Kentucky Bluegrass," agency officials announced their decision not to regulate a "Roundup Ready" strain of Kentucky bluegrass—that is, a strain genetically engineered to withstand glyphosate, Monsanto's widely used herbicide, which we know as Roundup. The maker of the novel grass seed, Scotts Miracle Gro, is now free to sell it far and wide. So you'll no doubt be seeing Roundup Ready bluegrass blanketing lawns and golf courses near you—and watching anal neighbors and groundskeepers literally dousing the grass in weed killer without fear of harming a single precious blade.

Which is worrisome enough. But even more worrisome is the way this particular product was approved. According to Doug Gurian-Sherman, senior scientist at the Union of Concerned Scientists' Food and Environment Program, the documents released by the USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) along with the announcement portend a major change in how the feds will deal with genetically modified crops.

Notably, given the already-lax regulatory regime governing GMOs (genetically modified organisms, click here for a primer), APHIS seems to be ramping down oversight to the point where it is essentially meaningless. The new regime corresponding with the bluegrass announcement would "drastically weaken USDA’s regulation," Gurian-Sherman told me. "This is perhaps the most serious change in US regs for crops for many years."
...


Much more, including a cogent explanation...

I thought it was worth mentioning.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R for exposure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Vilsack was once named Biotech Governor of the Year
by an industry lobbying group. Now we know why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Join the Organic Consumers Association
Edited on Fri Jul-08-11 10:07 PM by roody
or get on their email list.
http://www.organicconsumers.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Holy Freaking Genetically Mutant Planet, Batman. This is Big...
Edited on Fri Jul-08-11 10:09 PM by SpiralHawk
...and it appears to be distinctly against the desire and the will of the majority of citizens of These United States, but rather in skankulous, scuzzbucket, knee-bent, ass-slobbering, belly-groveling service to the BatShit Corporate Borg (R).

Keep this Mutant BatShit Thread kicked till the whole Mutant BatShit Story comes out...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. You took me back to mychildhood with that one.
I have to wonder how many grasses are capable of crossing with bluegrass and bentgrass?

There was a prank by a college band where all the members had pockets full of grass seed of a different variety than the field they were playing on. When they marched into a formation of their school letters they dumped the seed and the following spring there is was.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. K&R....The "Mighty M" marches on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Mighty Mutant?
Or Mighty MoJo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I think he means Mighty Monsanto
:shrug:

At least that's what I got.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. Kick nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. Roundup and birth defects. Is the public being kept in the dark?
Concerns about the best-selling herbicide Roundup® are running at an all-time high. Scientific research published in 2010 showed that Roundup and the chemical on which it is based,glyphosate, cause birth defects in frog and chicken embryos at dilutions much lower than those used in agricultural and garden spraying. The EU Commission dismissed these findings, based on a rebuttal provided by the German Federal Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety, BVL. BVL cited unpublished industry studies to back its claim that glyphosate was safe.

snip

The Commission has previously ignored or dismissed many other findings from the independent scientific literature showing that Roundup and glyphosate cause endocrine disruption, damage to DNA, reproductive and developmental toxicity, neurotoxicity, and cancer,as well as birth defects. Many of these effects are found at very low doses, comparable to levels of pesticide residues found in food and the environment.

The need for a review of glyphosate is particularly urgent in the light of the shortcomings of the existing review of the pesticide, on which its current approval rests. In this report, we examine the industry studies and regulatory documents that led to this approval.We show that industry and regulators knew as long ago as the 1980s and 1990s that glyphosate causes malformations – but that this information was not made public. We demonstrate how EU regulators reasoned their way from clear evidence of glyphosate’s teratogenicity (i.e. possessing the ability to induce birth defects /JC) in industry’s own studies (the same studies that BVL claimed show the safety of glyphosate) to a conclusion that minimized these findings in the EU Commission’s final review report.

The German government and its agencies played a central role in this process. As the“rapporteur” member state for glyphosate,Germany was responsible for liaising between industry and the EU Commission and reporting the findings of industry studies. We show how Germany played down findings of serious harm in industry studies on glyphosate. It irresponsibly proposed a high “safe” exposure level for the public that ignored important data on glyphosate’s teratogenic effects. This level was accepted by the Commission and is now in force.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/57277946/RoundupandBirthDefectsv5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Thank you for that link
First I'd heard about a link to birth defects.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. Tom Ballsack was one of the first of a line of bad appointments. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. Now who is vilsack's boss? How much money can one
asshat chemical corporation contribute to a president's reelection campaign?

How's that for change you can believe in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
14. Too late to recommend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pam4water Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Me too :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sulphurdunn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
16. In 2010, 466 agribusiness concerns
and 1,155 lobbyists spent $121 million getting what they want from the federal government. The biggest recipient was Uber Blue Dog Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-AR)and chair of the Senate agricultural committee. She raked in a cool $1 million plus. :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC