Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How we fund our capitalism sickens me.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
WingDinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 03:00 PM
Original message
How we fund our capitalism sickens me.
Edited on Sat Jul-09-11 03:01 PM by WingDinger
I have thought about this for years. I am embarrassed. Ashamed. Mortified.

We fund our capitalistic culture with manipulation, subliminal scam, and fear mongering. I am talking about advertising. Is this the best and only system possible? It lead to the shuttle disaster. It enshrines lying. Leads to corporate person hood. Puts a false face on those not in the least out to help you. One would get the idea from comms that they are just glad to be of service.

Then there are the fake, lamebrains that represent them. Pretty women that promise if you buy their crap, she will screw you. Ads that intentionally sow discord between parent and child.

Further, ads almost exclusively elect our leaders. Corps having person hood, are allowed to lie, without repercussion. Casey Anthony gets four years in prison, they get rich. We believe that the news is to inform us, it is not. We believe advocacy groups are pure. We are scared into staying behind closed doors. The better to sell as a block of suckers.

We rail against those that disappoint us, as if they are friends, and not businesses.

Those that design ads, intentionally make you miserable. The ennui meant to motivate you to fill the void with crap. That a system is used to harm humans sense of well being, is a travesty. They make women kill themselves literally, to look younger. They make men do violent things, to appear macho. We cheer, as ever more means of administering the misery is invented or allowed.

At the VERY LEAST, we should be taught somehow to ignore the frauds imposed upon us almost from birth. Instead, even school has the damned abominations. We even have awards for the most persuasive. Many of the most prestigious positions are these liars.

Worse yet, we give them tax breaks to spew them against us. That is, we pay them to indoctrinate us.

To hell with capitalism, if fraud and manipulation is all it has to offer as funding. If I was an alien, and I had a doomsday weapon, seeing our boobtoob, I would launch.

Then again, I guess human nature is what disgusts me. What sad creatures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. capitalism, in theory, doesn't need 'funding', if it's really capitalism...what we have here
is crony corporatism, which while a morally and ethically corrupt relation to capitalism, is not, in fact, capitalism at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Huh?
How did advertising lead to the Shuttle Disaster?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WingDinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Launch schedules were strict, environmental concerns lead to the elimination of the seating compound
Edited on Sat Jul-09-11 03:09 PM by WingDinger
for commercial purposes, so it was removed from the market. Nasqa doesnt run commercials, so worse compounds were relied upon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. What does that have to do with...
the Shuttle Disaster?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WingDinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Without advertizing, we have not the funding necessary for desired ends.
Edited on Sat Jul-09-11 03:14 PM by WingDinger
We couldnt even put on an olympics without the manipulative intrusions of it.

Our only other alternative is demonized. Taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I have no idea...
WTF you're rambling on about.

Excuse me, this is my stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sylveste Donating Member (126 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. i think someone
is due beer and travel money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WingDinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. In lieu of advertising, that would get my patronage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
"At the beginning of World War II the US had a mere 600 or so first-class fighting aircraft. We rapidly overcame this short supply by turning out more than 90,000 planes a year. The question at the start of World War II was: Do we have enough funds to produce the required implements of war? The answer was no, we did not have enough money, nor did we have enough gold; but we did have more than enough resources.

It was the available resources that enabled the US to achieve the high production and efficiency required to win the war. Unfortunately this is only considered in times of war. In a resource-based economy all of the world's resources are held as the common heritage of all of Earth's people, thus eventually outgrowing the need for the artificial boundaries that separate people. This is the unifying imperative."
~ Jacques Fresco


"The reality is that institutional establishments, institutions of codified thought, and institutions of societal influence and power, meaning philosophies, dogmas on one hand and corporations and governments on the other, each have a high propensity to engage in denial, dishonesty, and corruption to maintain self-preservation and self-perpetuation. The result is a continuous culture lag where social progress by way of incorporating new socially-helpful scientific advancements is constantly inhibited. It is like walking through a brick wall as the established power orthodoxies continue to perpetuate themselves for their own interests and comforts.

The profit mechanism creates established orders which constitute the survival and wealth for a few groups of people. The fact is that no matter how socially beneficial new advents may be, they will be viewed in hostility if they threaten an established financially-driven institution. Meaning social progress can be a threat to the establishment. So to put this into a sentence: Abundance, sustainability and efficiency are the enemies of profit.

Progressive advancement in science and technology which can solve problems of inefficiency and scarcity once and for all, are in effect making the prior establishment's servicing of those issues obsolete. Therefore in a monetary system corporations aren't just in competition with each other, they're in competition with progress itself. That is why social-change is so difficult within a monetary system. In other words, the established monetary system refuses to allow free-flowing change."
~ Peter Joseph

http://www.thevenusproject.com">The Venus Project
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WingDinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. The worst part is, it proves that capitalism is zero sum gain, as they vie for market share.
in extreme contrast to those fundamentalist religious, Libertarians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. deleted
Edited on Sat Jul-09-11 03:16 PM by MilesColtrane
forget it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WingDinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. That is correct, YOU have to pay for advertizing. Not them. YOU
Tax breaks for it are out of your pocket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. Hmm...somewhere, there is a logical step I'm missing in this
Edited on Sat Jul-09-11 03:45 PM by MineralMan
argument. Advertising has always been used to sell products. From the cockles and mussels seller singing in the street to the pharmaceutical companies singing on your TV. It's all the same. You can't buy what you don't know about.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WingDinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I didnt even attempt to claim a workaround. just that it is gross
Edited on Sat Jul-09-11 03:49 PM by WingDinger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
15. I was with you til the last sentence - "human nature"??
Human beings are social animals. Do you really think it is "human nature" to lie and deceive? It is not bad actors, my friend, it is the system that encourages such behavior. Get rid of the system and you'll see the possibility of real change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WingDinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Actually yes, I believe that it is human nature to lie and deceive.
Edited on Sat Jul-09-11 04:20 PM by WingDinger
And it is clear that you agree with me, even this point. The system, or status quo, is a reflection of human nature, or at least capitalizing on vulnerabilities of human nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. No, quite the contrary.
I do believe people will perform the behaviors that are rewarded, particularly if they have no other choice for survival. Capitalism is not the "natural" reflection of how humans behave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WingDinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Capitalism makes greed the highest and most honorable virtue.
Edited on Sat Jul-09-11 06:40 PM by WingDinger
That is based also on flawed man, from biblical fame. Which itself is a reflection on human nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC